| Literature DB >> 24600546 |
Vinod Kumar Nathan1, Mary Esther Rani1, Gunaseeli Rathinasamy1, Kannan Narayanan Dhiraviam1, Sridhar Jayavel1.
Abstract
Microbial cellulases are the enzymes widely studied due to their enormous applications in biochemical industry. Among 12 fungal isolates isolated from mangrove plant debris and soil sample collected from Valanthakad Mangroves, Kerala, India, 3 of them were found to exhibit cellulolytic activity. Among them, the most potent isolate which exhibited maximum cellulolytic activity was identified as Trichoderma viride VKF3 [Gene bank accession number- JX683684.1] based on colony morphology, microscopic observation and molecular centeracterization using D1/D2 region amplification. The isolate T. viride VKF3 was found to be non-phytopathogenic against the selected plants. Neighbour joining tree depicted its least divergence rate from the root taxon HM466686.1. T. viride VKF3 was grown under dynamic carbon, nitrogen sources, pH and temperature of the medium to draw out the optimum conditions for cellulase production. Protein stability kinetics and biomass production was also studied upto 11(th) day of incubation. It was evident from the study, that dextrose and beef extract could be used as major carbon and nitrogen sources in submerged fermentation at pH 9.0 and incubation temperature of 25°C to get maximum CMCase yield. Optimum enzyme recovery period was identified between 5(th) to 9(th) days of incubation beyond which the enzyme activity was reduced. By comparing two fermentation methods, submerged fermentation was found to be the best for maximum enzyme production. But utilization of substrates like sugarcane bagasse and cassava starch waste in the SSF offers a better scope in biodegradation of solid waste contributing to solid waste management.Entities:
Keywords: Biomass production; Cellulase; Protein production kinetics; Solid state fermentation; Trichoderma viride
Year: 2014 PMID: 24600546 PMCID: PMC3940716 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-92
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Phylogenetic relation among and other fungal sequences obtained after BLASTN.
Phyto pathogenecity test for fungal isolates
| Isolates | Shoot length (cm) | Root length (cm) | Fresh weight (g) | Dry weight (g) | Necrosis at infection site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 12.30 ± 0.264 | 5.23 ± 0.152 | 2.43 ± 0.096 | 0.63 ± 0.328 | No |
| VKF3 | 11.56 ± 0.709 | 3.83 ± 0.351 | 1.54 ± 0.280 | 0.40 ± 0.041 | No |
Figure 2Zymogram validating cellulolytic activity on 1% CMC supplemented gel stained with 0.1% (w/v) congo red after destaining with IM NaCl.
Figure 3CMCase and FPase production optimization using various carbon sources a) Dextrose b) Sucrose c) Xylose and d) CMC.
Figure 4CMCase and FPase production optimization using various nitrogen sources a) Peptone b) Beef extract c) Sodium nitrate and d) Ammonium nitrate.
Figure 5CMCase and FPase production optimization at different incubation temperature a) 25°C b) 35°C c) 45°C and d) 55°C.
Figure 6CMCase and FPase production optimization at different medium pH a) pH 3 b) pH 5 c) pH 7 and d) pH 9.
Figure 7Protein stability kinetics for various enzyme production parameters a) Carbon sources b) Nitrogen sources c) Temperature and d) pH.
Figure 8Biomass production under various optimized conditions a) Carbon sources b) nitrogen sources c) pH and d) temperature.
CMCase and FPase activity of enzymes produced from Solid State fermentation
| Substrates | Moisture % | CMCase activity | FPase activity | Protein concentration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (U/ml) | (U/ml) | (μg/ml) | ||
| Coconut Oil Cake (COC) | 20 | 2.841 | 0.410 | 204.6 ± 0.321 |
| 30 | 2.883 | 0.218 | 197.3 ± 0.115 | |
| 50 | 3.514 | 0.659 | 284.8 ± 0.175 | |
| Groundnut Oil Cake (GOC) | 20 | 0.294 | 0.110 | 105.4 ± 0.121 |
| 30 | 0.783 | 0.237 | 213.8 ± 0.203 | |
| 50 | 1.009 | 0.455 | 193.7 ± 0.321 | |
| Neem Oil Cake (NOC) | 20 | 0.625 | 0.101 | 109.3 ± 0.112 |
| 30 | 1.228 | 0.723 | 189.0 ± 0.321 | |
| 50 | 1.289 | 0.812 | 197.0 ± 0.127 | |
| Rice Bran (RB) | 20 | 1.136 | 0.562 | 111.2 ± 0.184 |
| 30 | 1.328 | 0.880 | 171.4 ± 0.061 | |
| 50 | 2.872 | 0.982 | 198.7 ± 0.117 | |
| Cassava Starch (CSW) | 20 | 1.329 | 0.231 | 233.1 ± 0.199 |
| 30 | 1.340 | 0.881 | 309.2 ± 0.098 | |
| 50 | 1.344 | 0.892 | 314.8 ± 0.067 | |
| Sugarcane Bagasse (SB) | 20 | 0.922 | 0.344 | 122.3 ±0.078 |
| 30 | 1.382 | 0.873 | 249.0 ±0.129 | |
| 50 | 3.229 | 1.009 | 272.6 ±0.011 |
Figure 9Enzyme yield (%) of substrates used in SSF for cellulase production using VKF3.
Figure 10Mass loss (%) of various substrates used in SSF for cellulase production using VKF3.