Literature DB >> 28388997

Barriers to Health Care Providers' Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception to Adolescent and Nulliparous Young Women.

Brooke Hopkins.   

Abstract

Despite recommendations for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) as a first-line contraceptive method for adolescents and young women, its use in the United States remains low. This integrative review highlights previously unidentified barriers to health care providers' provision of LARC to adolescent and nulliparous young women. Four themes emerged: Appropriateness of Candidates and Contraceptive Safety, Provider Training and Work Setting, Appropriate Resources, and Opportunity. Raising awareness of barriers to LARC use may galvanize providers to find solutions. Nurses and other clinicians can remain aware of new contraceptive options and guidelines to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy among adolescents.
© 2017 AWHONN, the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LARC; adolescent health; adolescent pregnancy; long-acting reversible contraception

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28388997     DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2017.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Womens Health        ISSN: 1751-4851


  8 in total

1.  Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  C Emily Hendrick; Joshua N Cone; Jessica Cirullo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Adolesc Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 2.  Reforming Women's Health Care: A Call to Action for Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners to Save Lives of Mothers and Infants.

Authors:  Janani Krishnaswami; Maria Del C Colon-Gonzalez
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-04-08

3.  Clinician and Staff Perceptions of Barriers to Providing Contraception in Primary Care.

Authors:  Lauren Cowen; Scott G Hartman; Elizabeth Loomis; Sukanya Srinivasan; Christina Gasbarro; Jocelyn Young
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2019-02-08

4.  Health workers' values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review.

Authors:  Komal S Soin; Ping Teresa Yeh; Mary E Gaffield; Christina Ge; Caitlin E Kennedy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Ten Years of Experience in Contraception Options for Teenagers in a Family Planning Center in Thrace and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsikouras; Dorelia Deuteraiou; Anastasia Bothou; Xanthi Anthoulaki; Anna Chalkidou; Eleftherios Chatzimichael; Fotini Gaitatzi; Bachar Manav; Zacharoula Koukoul; Stefanos Zervoudis; Grigorios Trypsianis; George Galazios
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Contraceptive uptake in post abortion care-Secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial, Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  Marlene Makenzius; Elisabeth Faxelid; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Theresa M A Odero; Marie Klingberg-Allvin; Monica Oguttu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Contraceptive Access at Federally Qualified Health Centers During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative: A Qualitative Analysis of Staff Perceptions and Experiences.

Authors:  Liane M Ventura; Kate E Beatty; Amal J Khoury; Michael G Smith; Oluwatosin Ariyo; Deborah L Slawson; Amy J Weber
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-12-15

8.  Hands-on Training in a Digital World: Novel Simulation-Based Virtual Training for Subdermal Contraceptive Implant Placement and Removal.

Authors:  Amanda Black; Denise Black; Rupinder Toor; Richard Gersh; Parambir Bhangu; Dustin Costescu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2022-09-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.