Literature DB >> 28388408

Aneuploidy Causes Non-genetic Individuality.

Rebecca R Beach1, Chiara Ricci-Tam2, Christopher M Brennan1, Christine A Moomau1, Pei-Hsin Hsu1, Bo Hua2, Rebecca E Silberman1, Michael Springer2, Angelika Amon3.   

Abstract

Phenotypic variability is a hallmark of diseases involving chromosome gains and losses, such as Down syndrome and cancer. Allelic variances have been thought to be the sole cause of this heterogeneity. Here, we systematically examine the consequences of gaining and losing single or multiple chromosomes to show that the aneuploid state causes non-genetic phenotypic variability. Yeast cell populations harboring the same defined aneuploidy exhibit heterogeneity in cell-cycle progression and response to environmental perturbations. Variability increases with degree of aneuploidy and is partly due to gene copy number imbalances, suggesting that subtle changes in gene expression impact the robustness of biological networks and cause alternate behaviors when they occur across many genes. As inbred trisomic mice also exhibit variable phenotypes, we further propose that non-genetic individuality is a universal characteristic of the aneuploid state that may contribute to variability in presentation and treatment responses of diseases caused by aneuploidy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; aneuploidy; biological noise; cancer; cell-to-cell variability; gene dosage effects; non-genetic heterogeneity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28388408      PMCID: PMC5441241          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  57 in total

1.  Mechanisms of haploinsufficiency revealed by genome-wide profiling in yeast.

Authors:  Adam M Deutschbauer; Daniel F Jaramillo; Michael Proctor; Jochen Kumm; Maureen E Hillenmeyer; Ronald W Davis; Corey Nislow; Guri Giaever
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Jake J Siegel; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 13.827

3.  Targeting the adaptability of heterogeneous aneuploids.

Authors:  Guangbo Chen; Wahid A Mulla; Andrei Kucharavy; Hung-Ji Tsai; Boris Rubinstein; Juliana Conkright; Scott McCroskey; William D Bradford; Lauren Weems; Jeff S Haug; Chris W Seidel; Judith Berman; Rong Li
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  A System to Study Aneuploidy In Vivo.

Authors:  Sarah J Pfau; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2016-03-02

6.  Karyotypic determinants of chromosome instability in aneuploid budding yeast.

Authors:  Jin Zhu; Norman Pavelka; William D Bradford; Giulia Rancati; Rong Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Aneuploid proliferation defects in yeast are not driven by copy number changes of a few dosage-sensitive genes.

Authors:  Megan E Bonney; Hisao Moriya; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site.

Authors:  H B Kim; B K Haarer; J R Pringle
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Phenotypic states become increasingly sensitive to perturbations near a bifurcation in a synthetic gene network.

Authors:  Kevin Axelrod; Alvaro Sanchez; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast.

Authors:  Noah Dephoure; Sunyoung Hwang; Ciara O'Sullivan; Stacie E Dodgson; Steven P Gygi; Angelika Amon; Eduardo M Torres
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  39 in total

1.  Chromosome Mis-segregation Generates Cell-Cycle-Arrested Cells with Complex Karyotypes that Are Eliminated by the Immune System.

Authors:  Stefano Santaguida; Amelia Richardson; Divya Ramalingam Iyer; Ons M'Saad; Lauren Zasadil; Kristin A Knouse; Yao Liang Wong; Nicholas Rhind; Arshad Desai; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Serine-Dependent Sphingolipid Synthesis Is a Metabolic Liability of Aneuploid Cells.

Authors:  Sunyoung Hwang; H Tobias Gustafsson; Ciara O'Sullivan; Gianna Bisceglia; Xinhe Huang; Christian Klose; Andrej Schevchenko; Robert C Dickson; Paola Cavaliere; Noah Dephoure; Eduardo M Torres
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Polo-like kinase 4 inhibition produces polyploidy and apoptotic death of lung cancers.

Authors:  Masanori Kawakami; Lisa Maria Mustachio; Lin Zheng; Yulong Chen; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Barbara Mino; Jonathan M Kurie; Jason Roszik; Pamela Andrea Villalobos; Kelsie L Thu; Jennifer Silvester; David W Cescon; Ignacio I Wistuba; Tak W Mak; Xi Liu; Ethan Dmitrovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Engaging Anaphase Catastrophe Mechanisms to Eradicate Aneuploid Cancers.

Authors:  Masanori Kawakami; Lisa Maria Mustachio; Xi Liu; Ethan Dmitrovsky
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  Aneuploidy increases resistance to chemotherapeutics by antagonizing cell division.

Authors:  John Michael Replogle; Wen Zhou; Adrianna E Amaro; James M McFarland; Mariana Villalobos-Ortiz; Jeremy Ryan; Anthony Letai; Omer Yilmaz; Jason Sheltzer; Stephen J Lippard; Uri Ben-David; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Aneuploidy and gene expression: is there dosage compensation?

Authors:  Shihoko Kojima; Daniela Cimini
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.778

7.  Intrinsic and chemically-induced daughter number variations in cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Iram Shazia Tyagi; Si Chen; Muhammad Ajmal Khan; Jia Xie; Ping Yin Li; Xi Long; Hong Xue
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Genetic variation in aneuploidy prevalence and tolerance across Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineages.

Authors:  Eduardo F C Scopel; James Hose; Douda Bensasson; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The diverse consequences of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Narendra Kumar Chunduri; Zuzana Storchová
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Trisomy 21-associated increases in chromosomal instability are unmasked by comparing isogenic trisomic/disomic leukocytes from people with mosaic Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kelly Rafferty; Kellie J Archer; Kristi Turner; Ruth Brown; Colleen Jackson-Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.