Rachel Schwallier1,2, Barbara Gravendeel1,3,4, Hugo de Boer1,5,6, Stephan Nylinder7, Bertie Joan van Heuven1, Anton Sieder8, Sukaibin Sumail9, Rogier van Vugt10, Frederic Lens1. 1. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Grand Valley State University, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI 49401, USA. 3. Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Zernikedreef 11, 2300 AJ Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden. 6. The Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, 0318 Oslo, Norway. 7. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativägen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden. 8. University of Vienna, Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien, Austria. 9. Sabah Park Herbarium, PO Box 6, Kinabalu Park, Kundasang, Ranau, Sabah, Malaysia. 10. Hortus Botanicus of Leiden University, Rapenburg 73, 2311 GJ Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Nepenthes attracts wide attention with its spectacularly shaped carnivorous pitchers, cultural value and horticultural curiosity. Despite the plant's iconic fascination, surprisingly little anatomical detail is known about the genus beyond its modified leaf tip traps. Here, the wood anatomical diversity of Nepenthes is explored. This diversity is further assessed with a phylogenetic framework to investigate whether the wood characters within the genus are relevant from an evolutionary or ecological perspective, or rather depend on differences in developmental stages, growth habits, substrates or precipitation. Methods: Observations were performed using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Ancestral states of selected wood and pith characters were reconstructed using an existing molecular phylogeny for Nepenthes and a broader Caryophyllales framework. Pairwise comparisons were assessed for possible relationships between wood anatomy and developmental stages, growth habits, substrates and ecology. Key Results: Wood anatomy of Nepenthes is diffuse porous, with mainly solitary vessels showing simple, bordered perforation plates and alternate intervessel pits, fibres with distinctly bordered pits (occasionally septate), apotracheal axial parenchyma and co-occurring uni- and multiseriate rays often including silica bodies. Precipitation and growth habit (stem length) are linked with vessel density and multiseriate ray height, while soil type correlates with vessel diameter, vessel element length and maximum ray width. For Caryophyllales as a whole, silica grains, successive cambia and bordered perforation plates are the result of convergent evolution. Peculiar helical sculpturing patterns within various cell types occur uniquely within the insectivorous clade of non-core Caryophyllales. Conclusions: The wood anatomical variation in Nepenthes displays variation for some characters dependent on soil type, precipitation and stem length, but is largely conservative. The helical-banded fibre-sclereids that mainly occur idioblastically in pith and cortex are synapomorphic for Nepenthes , while other typical Nepenthes characters evolved convergently in different Caryophyllales lineages.
Background and Aims: Nepenthes attracts wide attention with its spectacularly shaped carnivorous pitchers, cultural value and horticultural curiosity. Despite the plant's iconic fascination, surprisingly little anatomical detail is known about the genus beyond its modified leaf tip traps. Here, the wood anatomical diversity of Nepenthes is explored. This diversity is further assessed with a phylogenetic framework to investigate whether the wood characters within the genus are relevant from an evolutionary or ecological perspective, or rather depend on differences in developmental stages, growth habits, substrates or precipitation. Methods: Observations were performed using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Ancestral states of selected wood and pith characters were reconstructed using an existing molecular phylogeny for Nepenthes and a broader Caryophyllales framework. Pairwise comparisons were assessed for possible relationships between wood anatomy and developmental stages, growth habits, substrates and ecology. Key Results: Wood anatomy of Nepenthes is diffuse porous, with mainly solitary vessels showing simple, bordered perforation plates and alternate intervessel pits, fibres with distinctly bordered pits (occasionally septate), apotracheal axial parenchyma and co-occurring uni- and multiseriate rays often including silica bodies. Precipitation and growth habit (stem length) are linked with vessel density and multiseriate ray height, while soil type correlates with vessel diameter, vessel element length and maximum ray width. For Caryophyllales as a whole, silica grains, successive cambia and bordered perforation plates are the result of convergent evolution. Peculiar helical sculpturing patterns within various cell types occur uniquely within the insectivorous clade of non-core Caryophyllales. Conclusions: The wood anatomical variation in Nepenthes displays variation for some characters dependent on soil type, precipitation and stem length, but is largely conservative. The helical-banded fibre-sclereids that mainly occur idioblastically in pith and cortex are synapomorphic for Nepenthes , while other typical Nepenthes characters evolved convergently in different Caryophyllales lineages.
Authors: Philippe Cuénoud; Vincent Savolainen; Lars W Chatrou; Martyn Powell; Renée J Grayer; Mark W Chase Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Brendan Choat; Steven Jansen; Tim J Brodribb; Hervé Cochard; Sylvain Delzon; Radika Bhaskar; Sandra J Bucci; Taylor S Feild; Sean M Gleason; Uwe G Hacke; Anna L Jacobsen; Frederic Lens; Hafiz Maherali; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Stefan Mayr; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick J Mitchell; Andrea Nardini; Jarmila Pittermann; R Brandon Pratt; John S Sperry; Mark Westoby; Ian J Wright; Amy E Zanne Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mark E Olson; Tommaso Anfodillo; Julieta A Rosell; Giai Petit; Alan Crivellaro; Sandrine Isnard; Calixto León-Gómez; Leonardo O Alvarado-Cárdenas; Matiss Castorena Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Charles M Clarke; Ulrike Bauer; Ch'ien C Lee; Andrew A Tuen; Katja Rembold; Jonathan A Moran Journal: Biol Lett Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 3.703
Authors: Julia S Joswig; Christian Wirth; Meredith C Schuman; Jens Kattge; Björn Reu; Ian J Wright; Sebastian D Sippel; Nadja Rüger; Ronny Richter; Michael E Schaepman; Peter M van Bodegom; J H C Cornelissen; Sandra Díaz; Wesley N Hattingh; Koen Kramer; Frederic Lens; Ülo Niinemets; Peter B Reich; Markus Reichstein; Christine Römermann; Franziska Schrodt; Madhur Anand; Michael Bahn; Chaeho Byun; Giandiego Campetella; Bruno E L Cerabolini; Joseph M Craine; Andres Gonzalez-Melo; Alvaro G Gutiérrez; Tianhua He; Pedro Higuchi; Hervé Jactel; Nathan J B Kraft; Vanessa Minden; Vladimir Onipchenko; Josep Peñuelas; Valério D Pillar; Ênio Sosinski; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Evan Weiher; Miguel D Mahecha Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 15.460