Literature DB >> 28387590

Encoding of Predictable and Unpredictable Stimuli by Inferior Temporal Cortical Neurons.

Susheel Kumar1, Peter Kaposvari1,2, Rufin Vogels1.   

Abstract

Animals and humans learn statistical regularities that are embedded in sequences of stimuli. The neural mechanisms of such statistical learning are still poorly understood. Previous work in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex demonstrated suppressed spiking activity to visual images of a sequence in which the stimulus order was defined by transitional probabilities (labeled as "standard" sequence), compared with a sequence in which the stimulus order was random ("random" sequence). Here, we asked whether IT neurons encode the images of the standard sequence more accurately compared with images of the random sequence. Previous human fMRI studies in different sensory modalities also found a suppressed response to expected relative to unexpected stimuli but obtained various results regarding the effect of expectation on encoding, with one study reporting an improved classification accuracy of expected stimuli despite the reduced activation level. We employed a linear classifier to decode image identity from the spiking responses of the recorded IT neurons. We found a greater decoding accuracy for images of the standard compared with the random sequence during the early part of the stimulus presentation, but further analyses suggested that this reflected the sustained, stimulus-selective activity from the previous stimulus of the sequence, which is typical for IT neurons. However, the peak decoding accuracy was lower for the standard compared with the random sequence, in line with the reduced response to the former compared with the latter images. These data suggest that macaque IT neurons represent less accurately predictable compared with unpredictable images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28387590     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Expectation Suppression Dampens Sensory Representations of Predicted Stimuli.

Authors:  Kevin S Walsh; David P McGovern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Hans P Op de Beeck; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Apparent Motion Induces Activity Suppression in Early Visual Cortex and Impairs Visual Detection.

Authors:  Lu Shen; Biao Han; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Prediction error and repetition suppression have distinct effects on neural representations of visual information.

Authors:  Matthew F Tang; Cooper A Smout; Ehsan Arabzadeh; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Suppressed Sensory Response to Predictable Object Stimuli throughout the Ventral Visual Stream.

Authors:  David Richter; Matthias Ekman; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A Gradient of Sharpening Effects by Perceptual Prior across the Human Cortical Hierarchy.

Authors:  Carlos González-García; Biyu J He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Predictability's aftermath: Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects.

Authors:  Joost Rommers; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Population codes of prior knowledge learned through environmental regularities.

Authors:  Silvan C Quax; Sander E Bosch; Marius V Peelen; Marcel A J van Gerven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Neurons in inferior temporal cortex are sensitive to motion trajectory during degraded object recognition.

Authors:  Diana C Burk; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 10.  Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.

Authors:  Kevin S Walsh; David P McGovern; Andy Clark; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 5.691

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.