Rebecca Ford1, Tania King2, Naomi Priest3, Anne Kavanagh2. 1. 1 Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. 2. 2 Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. 3. 3 ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide the first Australian population-based estimates of the association between bullying and adverse mental health outcomes and suicidality among Australian adolescents. METHOD: Analysis of data from 3537 adolescents, aged 14-15 years from Wave 6 of the K-cohort of Longitudinal Study of Australian Children was conducted. We used Poisson and linear regression to estimate associations between bullying type (none, relational-verbal, physical, both types) and role (no role, victim, bully, victim and bully), and mental health (measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, symptoms of anxiety and depression) and suicidality. RESULTS: Adolescents involved in bullying had significantly increased Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, depression and anxiety scores in all bullying roles and types. In terms of self-harm and suicidality, bully-victims had the highest risk of self-harm (prevalence rate ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval [3.26, 6.83]), suicidal ideation (prevalence rate ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval [2.83, 6.49]), suicidal plan (prevalence rate ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval [2.54, 6.58]) and attempts (prevalence rate ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval [1.39, 5.13]), followed by victims then bullies. The experience of both relational-verbal and physical bullying was associated with the highest risk of self-harm (prevalence rate ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval [3.15, 6.60]), suicidal ideation or plans (prevalence rate ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval [3.05, 6.95]; and 4.8, 95% confidence interval [3.01, 7.64], respectively) or suicide attempts (prevalence rate ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval [1.90, 6.30]). CONCLUSION: This study presents the first national, population-based estimates of the associations between bullying by peers and mental health outcomes in Australian adolescents. The markedly increased risk of poor mental health outcomes, self-harm and suicidal ideation and behaviours among adolescents who experienced bullying highlights the importance of addressing bullying in school settings.
OBJECTIVE: To provide the first Australian population-based estimates of the association between bullying and adverse mental health outcomes and suicidality among Australian adolescents. METHOD: Analysis of data from 3537 adolescents, aged 14-15 years from Wave 6 of the K-cohort of Longitudinal Study of Australian Children was conducted. We used Poisson and linear regression to estimate associations between bullying type (none, relational-verbal, physical, both types) and role (no role, victim, bully, victim and bully), and mental health (measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, symptoms of anxiety and depression) and suicidality. RESULTS: Adolescents involved in bullying had significantly increased Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, depression and anxiety scores in all bullying roles and types. In terms of self-harm and suicidality, bully-victims had the highest risk of self-harm (prevalence rate ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval [3.26, 6.83]), suicidal ideation (prevalence rate ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval [2.83, 6.49]), suicidal plan (prevalence rate ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval [2.54, 6.58]) and attempts (prevalence rate ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval [1.39, 5.13]), followed by victims then bullies. The experience of both relational-verbal and physical bullying was associated with the highest risk of self-harm (prevalence rate ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval [3.15, 6.60]), suicidal ideation or plans (prevalence rate ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval [3.05, 6.95]; and 4.8, 95% confidence interval [3.01, 7.64], respectively) or suicide attempts (prevalence rate ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval [1.90, 6.30]). CONCLUSION: This study presents the first national, population-based estimates of the associations between bullying by peers and mental health outcomes in Australian adolescents. The markedly increased risk of poor mental health outcomes, self-harm and suicidal ideation and behaviours among adolescents who experienced bullying highlights the importance of addressing bullying in school settings.
Authors: Shay Arnon; Anat Brunstein Klomek; Elina Visoki; Tyler M Moore; Stirling T Argabright; Grace E DiDomenico; Tami D Benton; Ran Barzilay Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Sheng Zhang; Meiqian Gong; Wenyan Li; Wanxin Wang; Ruipeng Wu; Lan Guo; Ciyong Lu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Luyao Xiao; Sheng Zhang; Wenyan Li; Ruipeng Wu; Wanxin Wang; Tian Wang; Lan Guo; Ciyong Lu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jérémie Richard; Loredana Marchica; William Ivoska; Jeffrey Derevensky Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Francesco Donato; Maria Triassi; Ilaria Loperto; Alessia Maccaro; Sara Mentasti; Federica Crivillaro; Antonella Elvetico; Elia Croce; Elena Raffetti Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Natalia Albaladejo-Blázquez; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales; Nicolás Ruiz-Robledillo; Miriam Sánchez-Sansegundo; Violeta Clement-Carbonell; Ana Zaragoza-Martí Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yi-Lung Chen; Hsing-Ying Ho; Ray C Hsiao; Wei-Hsin Lu; Cheng-Fang Yen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Songli Mei; Yueyang Hu; Mengzi Sun; Junsong Fei; Chuanen Li; Leilei Liang; Yuanchao Hu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 3.390