Literature DB >> 28386685

A machine learning approach to investigate the relationship between shape features and numerically predicted risk of ascending aortic aneurysm.

Liang Liang1, Minliang Liu1, Caitlin Martin1, John A Elefteriades2, Wei Sun3.   

Abstract

Geometric features of the aorta are linked to patient risk of rupture in the clinical decision to electively repair an ascending aortic aneurysm (AsAA). Previous approaches have focused on relationship between intuitive geometric features (e.g., diameter and curvature) and wall stress. This work investigates the feasibility of a machine learning approach to establish the linkages between shape features and FEA-predicted AsAA rupture risk, and it may serve as a faster surrogate for FEA associated with long simulation time and numerical convergence issues. This method consists of four main steps: (1) constructing a statistical shape model (SSM) from clinical 3D CT images of AsAA patients; (2) generating a dataset of representative aneurysm shapes and obtaining FEA-predicted risk scores defined as systolic pressure divided by rupture pressure (rupture is determined by a threshold criterion); (3) establishing relationship between shape features and risk by using classifiers and regressors; and (4) evaluating such relationship in cross-validation. The results show that SSM parameters can be used as strong shape features to make predictions of risk scores consistent with FEA, which lead to an average risk classification accuracy of 95.58% by using support vector machine and an average regression error of 0.0332 by using support vector regression, while intuitive geometric features have relatively weak performance. Compared to FEA, this machine learning approach is magnitudes faster. In our future studies, material properties and inhomogeneous thickness will be incorporated into the models and learning algorithms, which may lead to a practical system for clinical applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ascending aortic aneurysm; Computer-aided diagnosis; Finite element analysis; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28386685      PMCID: PMC5630492          DOI: 10.1007/s10237-017-0903-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  40 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.

Authors:  Judy Shum; Giampaolo Martufi; Elena Di Martino; Christopher B Washington; Joseph Grisafi; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A generalized prestressing algorithm for finite element simulations of preloaded geometries with application to the aorta.

Authors:  Hannah Weisbecker; David M Pierce; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Jonathan P Vande Geest; David H J Wang; Stephen R Wisniewski; Michel S Makaroun; David A Vorp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Machine learning-based 3-D geometry reconstruction and modeling of aortic valve deformation using 3-D computed tomography images.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Fanwei Kong; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham; Qian Wang; James Duncan; Wei Sun
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 5.  A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.

Authors:  E Choke; G Cockerill; W R W Wilson; S Sayed; J Dawson; I Loftus; M M Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 6.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser; Ray W Ogden; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  A review of computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic and colonic imaging.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-09

8.  Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: Implications for rupture risk.

Authors:  Mark F Fillinger; Jessica Racusin; Robert K Baker; Jack L Cronenwett; Arno Teutelink; Marc L Schermerhorn; Robert M Zwolak; Richard J Powell; Daniel B Walsh; Eva M Rzucidlo
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.

Authors:  José F Rodríguez; Cristina Ruiz; Manuel Doblaré; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Biomechanical characterization of ascending aortic aneurysm with concomitant bicuspid aortic valve and bovine aortic arch.

Authors:  T Pham; C Martin; J Elefteriades; W Sun
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  26 in total

1.  A deep learning approach to estimate stress distribution: a fast and accurate surrogate of finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Minliang Liu; Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  On the computation of in vivo transmural mean stress of patient-specific aortic wall.

Authors:  Minliang Liu; Liang Liang; Haofei Liu; Ming Zhang; Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-11-09

3.  Estimation of in vivo constitutive parameters of the aortic wall using a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Minliang Liu; Liang Liang; Wei Sun
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  A deep learning approach to estimate chemically-treated collagenous tissue nonlinear anisotropic stress-strain responses from microscopy images.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Minliang Liu; Wei Sun
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Ex Vivo Mechanical Tests and Multiscale Computational Modeling Highlight the Importance of Intramural Shear Stress in Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Christopher E Korenczuk; Rohit Y Dhume; Kenneth Liao; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Simulating progressive intramural damage leading to aortic dissection using DeepONet: an operator-regression neural network.

Authors:  Minglang Yin; Ehsan Ban; Bruno V Rego; Enrui Zhang; Cristina Cavinato; Jay D Humphrey; George Em Karniadakis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  A machine learning model for non-invasive detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery aneurysm.

Authors:  Ali A Rostam-Alilou; Marziyeh Safari; Hamid R Jarrah; Ali Zolfagharian; Mahdi Bodaghi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.421

8.  Estimation of in vivo mechanical properties of the aortic wall: A multi-resolution direct search approach.

Authors:  Minliang Liu; Liang Liang; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-10-20

9.  Machine learning approaches to surrogate multifidelity Growth and Remodeling models for efficient abdominal aortic aneurysmal applications.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Jiang; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.698

10.  Personalized Pre- and Post-Operative Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Coarctation from 3D Rotational Angiography.

Authors:  Cosmin-Ioan Nita; Andrei Puiu; Daniel Bunescu; Lucian Mihai Itu; Viorel Mihalef; Gouthami Chintalapani; Aimee Armstrong; Jeffrey Zampi; Lee Benson; Puneet Sharma; Saikiran Rapaka
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.495

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.