Literature DB >> 15192565

Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: Implications for rupture risk.

Mark F Fillinger1, Jessica Racusin, Robert K Baker, Jack L Cronenwett, Arno Teutelink, Marc L Schermerhorn, Robert M Zwolak, Richard J Powell, Daniel B Walsh, Eva M Rzucidlo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze anatomic characteristics of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with conventional two-dimensional computed tomography (CT), including comparison with control subjects matched for age, gender, and size.
METHODS: Records were reviewed to identify all CT scans obtained at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center or referring hospitals before emergency AAA repair performed because of rupture or acute severe pain (RUP group). CT scans obtained before elective AAA repair (ELEC group) were reviewed for age and gender match with patients in the RUP group. More than 40 variables were measured on each CT scan. Aneurysm diameter matching was achieved by consecutively deleting the largest RUP scan and the smallest ELEC scan to prevent bias.
RESULTS: CT scans were analyzed for 259 patients with AAAs: 122 RUP and 137 ELEC. Patients were well matched for age, gender, and other demographic variables or risk factors. Maximum AAA diameter was significantly different in comparisons of all patients (RUP, 6.5 +/- 2 cm vs ELEC, 5.6 +/- 1 cm; P <.0001), and mean diameter of ruptured AAAs was 5 mm smaller in female patients (6.1 +/- 2 cm vs 6.6 +/- 2 cm; P =.007). Two hundred patients were matched for diameter, gender, and age (100 from each group; maximum AAA diameter, 6.0 +/- 1 cm vs 6.0 +/- 1 cm). Analysis of diameter-matched AAAs indicated that most variables were statistically similar in the two groups, including infrarenal neck length (17 +/- 1 mm vs 19 +/- 1 mm; P =.3), maximum thrombus thickness (25 +/- 1 mm vs 23 +/- 1 mm, P =.4), and indices of body habitus, such as [(maximum AAA diameter)/(normal suprarenal aorta diameter)] or [(maximum AAA diameter)/(L3 transverse diameter)]. Multivariate analysis controlling for gender indicated that the most significant variables for rupture were aortic tortuosity (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, indicating greater risk with no or mild tortuosity), diameter asymmetry (OR, 3.2 for a 1-cm difference in major-minor axis), and current smoking (OR, 2.7, with the greater risk in current smokers).
CONCLUSIONS: When matched for age, gender, and diameter, ruptured AAAs tend to be less tortuous, yet have greater cross-sectional diameter asymmetry. On conventional two-dimensional CT axial sections, it appears that when diameter asymmetry is associated with low aortic tortuosity, the larger diameter on axial sections more accurately reflects rupture risk, and when diameter asymmetry is associated with moderate or severe aortic tortuosity, the smaller diameter on axial sections more accurately reflects rupture risk. Current smoking is significantly associated with rupture, even when controlling for gender and AAA anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15192565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  42 in total

1.  Biomechanical and microstructural properties of common carotid arteries from fibulin-5 null mice.

Authors:  William Wan; Hiromi Yanagisawa; Rudolph L Gleason
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.

Authors:  Judy Shum; Giampaolo Martufi; Elena Di Martino; Christopher B Washington; Joseph Grisafi; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Biomarkers of AAA progression. Part 1: extracellular matrix degeneration.

Authors:  Femke A M V I Hellenthal; Willem A Buurman; Will K W H Wodzig; Geert Willem H Schurink
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  A Tender Pulsatile Epigastric Mass is NOT Always an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Osama Moussa; Ahmad Al Samaraee; Rupsha Ray; Colin Nice; Vish Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2010-10-01

Review 5.  Mechanics, mechanobiology, and modeling of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms.

Authors:  J D Humphrey; G A Holzapfel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Relative importance of aneurysm diameter and body size for predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in men and women.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Bing Lu; Margriet T M Fokkema; Mark Conrad; Virendra I Patel; Mark Fillinger; Robina Matyal; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Mechanical instability of normal and aneurysmal arteries.

Authors:  Avione Y Lee; Arnav Sanyal; Yangming Xiao; Ramsey Shadfan; Hai-Chao Han
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Can local secretion of prostaglandin E2, thromboxane B2, and interleukin-6 play a role in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm?

Authors:  Bernice L Y Cheuk; Stephen W K Cheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Evolving anisotropy and degree of elastolytic insult in abdominal aortic aneurysms: potential clinical relevance?

Authors:  John S Wilson; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Robust infrarenal aortic aneurysm lumen centerline detection for rupture status classification.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Vitaly O Kheyfets; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.