Francisco Giner1, Isidro Machado2, Jose Antonio Lopez-Guerrero3, Empar Mayordomo-Aranda1, Antonio Llombart-Bosch1. 1. Department of Pathology, Universitat de València Estudi General (UVEG), València 46010, Spain. 2. Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (FIVO), Valencia 46009, Spain. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (FIVO), Valencia 46009, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract. Spindle cell monophasic synovial sarcoma (SS) can be morphologically similar. Angiogenesis is a major factor for tumour growth and metastasis. Our aim was to compare the angiogenic expression profiles of high-risk GIST and spindle cell monophasic SS by histological, immunohistochemical and molecular characterisation of the neovascularisation established between xenotransplanted tumours and the host during the initial phases of growth in nude mice. METHODS: The angiogenic profile of two xenotransplanted human soft-tissue tumours were evaluated in 15 passages in nude mice using tissue microarrays (TMA). Tumour pieces were also implanted subcutaneously on the backs of 14 athymic Balb-c nude mice. The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 96 h; and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after implantation to perform histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular studies (neovascularisation experiments). RESULTS: Morphological similarities were apparent in the early stages of neoplastic growth of these two soft-tissue tumours throughout the passages in nude mice and in the two neovascularisation experiments. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated overexpression of pro-angiogenic factors between 24 h and 96 h after xenotransplantation in both tumours. Additionally, neoplastic cells coexpressed chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, GRO, and CXCL12) and their receptors in both tumours. Molecular studies showed two expression profiles, revealing an early and a late phase in the angiogenic process. CONCLUSION: This model could provide information on the early stages of the angiogenic process in monophasic spindle cell SS and high-risk GIST and offers an excellent way to study possible tumour response to antiangiogenic drugs.
BACKGROUND:Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract. Spindle cell monophasic synovial sarcoma (SS) can be morphologically similar. Angiogenesis is a major factor for tumour growth and metastasis. Our aim was to compare the angiogenic expression profiles of high-risk GIST and spindle cell monophasic SS by histological, immunohistochemical and molecular characterisation of the neovascularisation established between xenotransplanted tumours and the host during the initial phases of growth in nude mice. METHODS: The angiogenic profile of two xenotransplanted humansoft-tissue tumours were evaluated in 15 passages in nude mice using tissue microarrays (TMA). Tumour pieces were also implanted subcutaneously on the backs of 14 athymic Balb-c nude mice. The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 96 h; and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after implantation to perform histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular studies (neovascularisation experiments). RESULTS: Morphological similarities were apparent in the early stages of neoplastic growth of these two soft-tissue tumours throughout the passages in nude mice and in the two neovascularisation experiments. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated overexpression of pro-angiogenic factors between 24 h and 96 h after xenotransplantation in both tumours. Additionally, neoplastic cells coexpressed chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, GRO, and CXCL12) and their receptors in both tumours. Molecular studies showed two expression profiles, revealing an early and a late phase in the angiogenic process. CONCLUSION: This model could provide information on the early stages of the angiogenic process in monophasic spindle cell SS and high-risk GIST and offers an excellent way to study possible tumour response to antiangiogenic drugs.
High-grade sarcomas can be implanted into immunodeficientmice, where they grow as xenografts supported by the murine stroma blood supply [1]. In general, transplantations of low-grade tumours fail to establish, with successful xenografts deriving mainly from aggressive neoplasms. Although some properties of the original tumours may not be fully represented, xenografts have become very useful models for preclinical experiments in cancer research [2-5].In recent years, much research has focused on the role of angiogenesis in tumour development, growth, invasion, and metastasis [6, 7]. It has become clear that tumour angiogenesis is the result of an imbalance between proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, the threshold of change in favour of proangiogenesis is considered to be the angiogenic switch. Several angiogenic factors and chemokines related with angiogenic mechanisms have been studied in different tumour types [6, 8, 9]. We recently communicated these findings in a nude miceosteosarcoma model [10] as well as in two high-grade chondrosarcomas (in press) [11]. The angiogenic process presents two different phases of tumour growth. An initial induction phase, in which new unstable vessels are built, followed by a remodelling phase, in which blood vessels are stabilised [12]. At this point, hypoxia occurs and the angiogenic process is activated through the well-known hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF) that induce the expression of several tumour-derived cytokines, such as vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) or fibroblast growth factors (FGF) [6] and some chemokines (GRO, CXCL9, and CXCL10) with their respective receptors (CXCR2 and CXCR3) [8, 13, 14]. More recently, the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis was reported to be involved in mediating tumour cell invasion and proliferation and to play an important role in tumour angiogenesis, progression, and metastasis [15, 16]. Moreover, CXCR4 expression has been associated with poor survival in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas [17, 18] and many types of carcinomas [19]. Consequently, considerable interest has been generated in the therapeutic potential of targeting the growth of new vessels (antiangiogenesis) and the capacity to control those that have already been formed (vascular targeting) [13, 20].Soft-tissue sarcomas are an infrequent group of mesenchymal tumours, they may be high grade and display poor survival [21]. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract and spans a clinical spectrum from benign to malignant; most cases contain KIT- or PDGFRA-activating mutations [22]. Mutations in different genes may also be present, [23] although the main prognostic factors are tumour size, mitotic activity, location and capsular invasion [24, 25]. Targeted therapy with imatinib is indicated for high-risk cases and in advanced disease [23].Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a mesenchymal tumour with a variable degree of epithelial differentiation and a specific chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11;q11) that leads to the formation of an SS18–SSX fusion gene. The differential diagnosis with a high-grade GIST may be difficult [26, 27]. Both tumour types cause metastasis and display an aggressive behaviour, suggesting that molecular reorganisations such as of SYT–SSX gene translocation and KIT mutations might be similarly essential for the growth of angiogenic factors. A recent publication described an intra-abdominal monophasic spindle cell SS that mimicked the morphology and immunohistochemistry of a high-risk spindle cell GIST [27].Several animal models have been used in the study of tumour angiogenesis [12, 14, 28]. Studying angiogenesis through a xenograft model in high-grade sarcomas such as high-risk GIST and synovial sarcomas (SS) may provide a better understanding of this process and increase information regarding potential candidates for effective targeted therapy.We developed a xenograft nude mice model to clarify the presence of angiogenic factors within the neoformed peritumoral stroma and in the internal tumour blood supply, during the early stages of tumour growth after the transfer into the subcutaneous tissue of the host. To this end, we used two previously established xenotransplanted tumour cell lines of humansarcomas: a high-risk spindle cell GIST and a monophasic spindle cell SS [22, 29].Our aim was to characterise the markers associated with vasculogenesis using histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular techniques and to search for similarities that may exist between the two tumours.
Materials and methods
Samples
Samples were collected from patients treated at the Hospital Clínic Universitari de Valencia. The GIST came from a 63-year-old male with a gastric mass of approximately 26 × 20 × 35 cm diagnosed as a high-risk spindle cell tumour (Figure 2A). Firstly, the GIST was treated with imatinib (400 mg/day) for six months. The tumour responded partially to targeted therapy and finally resection of the mass was decided upon seven months after diagnosis. No metastasis was seen at the moment of diagnosis, but the patient died of various surgical complications after resection.
Figure 2.
(A) GIST with spindle-cell pattern (H&E, 20X). (B) High-risk GIST with some mitotic figures (H&E, 40X). (C) Intense positivity of DOG-1 in GIST, 40X. (D) Intense positivity of CD34 in GIST, 40X. (E) High proliferative Ki67 index in late passages of GIST, 40X. (F) Monomorphic spindle-cell pattern in SS (H&E, 40X). (G) Mild EMA positivity in SS, 40X. (H) High proliferative Ki67 index in late passages of SS, 40X. (I) Intense VEGF expression in SS 24 h after tumour implantation, 40X.
The SS came from a 32-year-old male who attended our hospital with a relapse in the right thigh and multiple lung metastases after chemo-radiotherapy. The tumour was approximately 10 × 8 × 8 cm and was diagnosed as monophasic spindle-cell SS, the patient died of tumour progression several months after diagnosis.Molecular biology studies revealed genomic alterations in both tumours. The GIST had the KIT gene mutation and the SS had the typical translocation t(X,18)(SYT-SSX).The tumours were collected for histopathological, ultrastructural, and genetic characterisation at our Pathology Department. The original tumours were transferred subcutaneously on the backs of nude mice (Nu407 and Nu335) and maintained for several generations (passages). In both tumours, we divided the passages into three time periods, early passages (from 1st to 5th passage), middle passages (from 6th to 10th passage) and late passages (from 11th to 15th passage). We calculated the average speed of tumour growth in both nude mice passages (Nu335 and Nu407) according to the formula (15 mm/days to next passage), 15 mm being the approximate tumour size when mice were sacrificed.Tumour pieces 3–4 mm in size from the early passages of Nu407 and Nu335 were also xenografted subcutaneously on the backs of two sets of athymic Balb-c nude mice (n = 14 each). The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 96 h; and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after implantation (neovascularisation experiments). Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, and haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed for histological analysis. Moreover non-fixed samples were collected for molecular analysis. Approval for animal experimentation was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Universitat de València Estudi General (UVEG).
Assembly of TMAs
Tissue microarrays were constructed using a Manual Tissue Arrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Praire, WI). Two cores (1 mm thick) of each sample were included, with additional cores in cases with diverse morphologic areas. The TMA contained normal tissue controls, original tumour, and the corresponding xenograft passages. The cores were grouped into early transfers 1–5, middle passages 6–10, and late passages 11–15. After assembly, an initial section from each TMA was stained with haematoxylin–eosin to evaluate the viability of the samples. Several 5-mm sections were also prepared for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Table 1 summarises the antibodies used for the IHC.
Table 1.
Antibodies used in the experiences.
Marker
Clonality (Clon)
Location
Dilution
Manufacturer
Ki-67
Monoclonal (MIB-1)
Nuclear
1/50
Dako
HIF1 α
Monoclonal (HI α 67)
Cytoplasm
1/500
Chemicon
VEGF
Monoclonal (VG 1)
Cytoplasm
1/100
Neomarkers
VEGFR1
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/400
Santa Cruz
VEGRF2
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/400
Santa Cruz
VEGFR3
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/400
Santa Cruz
PDGFR α
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Cytoplasm
1/100
Santa Cruz
FGF 2
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Cytoplasm
1/200
Santa Cruz
VE- CAD
Polyclonal (goat)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/50
Santa Cruz
CXCL9
Polyclonal (goat)
Cytoplasm
1/100
R&DSystems
CXCL10
Polyclonal (goat)
Nuclear/cytoplasm
1/100
R&DSystems
GRO
Monoclonal (31716)
Cytoplasm
1/200
R&DSystems
CXCL12
Monoclonal(79018)
Cytoplasm
1/60
R&DSystems
CXCR3
Monoclonal (2Ar1)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/200
Abcam
CXCR2
Polyclonal(mouse)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/20
BioLegend
CXCR4
Monoclonal(44716)
Nuclear
1/150
R&DSystems
Vimentine
Monoclonal (V9)
Cytoplasm
1/300
Novocastra
DOG-1
Monoclonal (BV10)
Cytoplasm
1/50
DBS
CD117
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Membrane/cytoplasm
1/100
Dako
TLE-1
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Nuclear
1/50
Santa Cruz
CD34
Monoclonal (QBEnd10)
Cytoplasm
pre-diluted
Dako
S-100
Polyclonal (rabbit)
Cytoplasm
1/2000
Dako
Desmin
Monoclonal (D33)
Cytoplasm
pre-diluted
Dako
EMA
Monoclonal (E29)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/200
Dako
CK(AE1/AE3)
Monoclonal (AE1/AE3)
Cytoplasm/membrane
1/100
Dako
BCL-2
Monoclonal (3.1)
Nuclear
1/50
Novocastra
Immunohistochemistry
IHC was carried out by an indirect peroxidase method on paraffin sections following the same methodology, as we discussed in our previous papers [10] and [11].
Molecular biology
RNA was extracted from 50 to 200 mg of tumour samples obtained from the NU335 and Nu407 series.The whole methodology and studied genes (Table 1S) are also discussed in our previous papers [10] and [11].
Table 1.
Supplementary. Genes and assays included in the low-density array for the study of the expression of angiogenic factors by quantitative RT-PCR.
S.No
Gene symbol
Assay references(Applied Biosystems)
Amplicon size (pb)
OMIM
1
AMOT (angiomotin)
Hs00611096_m1
65
300410
2
ANG (angiogenina)
Hs00265741_s1
91
105850
3
ANGPT1 (angiopoietin-1)
Hs00181613_m1
87
601667
4
ANGPT2 (angiopoietin-2)
Hs00169867_m1
73
601922
5
CHGA (Vasostatin/Chromogranin-A)
Hs00154441_m1
115
118910
Growth factors and receptors
6
Ephrin 2A (EFNA2)
Hs00154858_m1
89
602756
7
Ephrin-A5 (EFNA5)
Hs00157342_m1
98
601535
8
Ephrin-B2 (EFNB2)
Hs00187950_m1
63
600527
9
EPHB4 (Ephrin B4)
Hs00174752_m1
82
600011
10
FGF1 (aFGF)
Hs00265254_m1
65
131220
11
FGF2 (bFGF)
Hs00266645_m1
82
134920
12
FGF4
Hs00173564_m1
53
164980
13
FGF6
Hs00173934_m1
64
134921
14
FGF7
Hs00384281_m1
85
148180
15
FGFR1
Hs00241111_m1
81
136350
16
FGFR2 (KGFR)
Hs00240792_m1
77
176943
17
FGFR3
Hs00179829_m1
104
134934
18
FGFR4
Hs00242558_m1
74
134935
19
PDGFA
Hs00234994_m1
93
173430
20
PDGFB
Hs00234042_m1
80
190040
21
PDGFRA
Hs00183486_m1
92
173490
22
PDGFRB
Hs00182163_m1
86
173410
23
PF4 (Platelet factor 4)
Hs00236998_m1
86
173460
24
TGFA
Hs00177401_m1
95
190170
25
TGFB1
Hs00171257_m1
63
190180
26
TGFB2
Hs00234244_m1
92
190220
27
TGFB3
Hs00234245_m1
75
190230
28
TGFBR1
Hs00610319_m1
126
190181
29
TGFBR2
Hs00234253_m1
70
190182
30
TGFBR3
Hs00234257_m1
60
600742
31
FIGF (VEGFD)
Hs00189521_m1
130
300091
32
FLK1 (KDR)
Hs00176676_m1
84
191306
33
FLT1 (VEGFR2)
Hs00176573_m1
55
165070
34
PGF
Hs00182176_m1
56
601121
35
VEGF
Hs00173626_m1
77
192240
36
VEGFB
Hs00173634_m1
69
601398
37
VEGFC
Hs00153458_m1
126
601528
38
FLT4 (VEGFR3)
Hs01047679_m1
89
136352
39
CD36
Hs00169627_m1
77
173510
40
EDG1
Hs00173499_m1
102
601974
41
EGF
Hs00153181_m1
95
131530
42
EGFR
Hs00193306_m1
69
131550
43
GRO1 (CXCL1)
Hs00236937_m1
70
155730
44
HGF (Scatter factor)
Hs00300159_m1
92
142409
45
IGF1
Hs00153126_m1
70
147440
46
IGF1R
Hs00181385_m1
77
147370
47
TEK (Tie-2)
Hs00176096_m1
82
600221
48
TIE1
Hs00178500_m1
74
600222
Cytokines and chemokines
49
CSF3
Hs00236884_m1
78
138970
50
IFNA1
Hs00256882_s1
115
147660
51
IFNB1
Hs00277188_s1
134
147640
52
IFNG
Hs00174143_m1
79
147570
53
IL10
Hs00174086_m1
119
124092
54
IL12A
Hs00168405_m1
67
161560
55
IL8
Hs00174103_m1
101
146930
56
MDK
Hs00171064_m1
102
162096
57
NRP1 (neuropilin-1)
Hs00826129_m1
97
602069
58
PRL (prolactin)
Hs00168730_m1
76
176760
59
PTN (pleiotrophin)
Hs00383235_m1
76
162095
60
SCYA2
Hs00234140_m1
101
158105
61
SPARC
Hs00277762_m1
122
182120
62
TNFA
Hs00174128_m1
80
191160
63
TNFSF15 (VEGI)
Hs00353710_s1
97
604052
Adhesion molecules
64
CDH5 (VE-Cadherin)
Hs00174344_m1
66
601120
65
ITGA5 (integrin a5)
Hs00233743_m1
86
135620
66
ITGAV (integrin aV)
Hs00233808_m1
64
193210
67
ITGB3
Hs00173978_m1
89
173470
68
PECAM1 (CD31)
Hs00169777_m1
65
173445
Matrix Proteins, Proteases and Inhibitors
69
ADAMTS1 (METH1)
Hs00199608_m1
68
605174
70
ADAMTS8 (METH2)
Hs00199836_m1
59
605175
71
COL18A1 (LOC51695/endostatin)
Hs00181017_m1
72
120328
72
FN1 (fibronectin)
Hs00415006_m1
86
135600
73
HPSE (heparanase)
Hs00180737_m1
59
604724
74
MMP2
Hs00234422_m1
83
120360
75
MMP9
Hs00234579_m1
54
120361
76
MSR1
Hs00234012_m1
80
153622
77
PLAU (uPA)
Hs00170182_m1
104
191840
78
SERPINB5 (maspin)
Hs00184728_m1
104
154790
79
SERPINF1 (PEDF)
Hs00171467_m1
88
172860
80
THBS1
Hs00170236_m1
109
188060
81
THBS2
Hs00170248_m1
87
188061
82
THBS3
Hs00200157_m1
85
188062
83
THBS4
Hs00170261_m1
98
600715
83
TIMP1
Hs00171558_m1
104
305370
85
TIMP2
Hs00234278_m1
73
188825
Transcription factors
86
ERBB2
Hs00397754_m1
58
164870
87
ETS1
Hs00428287_m1
92
164720
88
HIF1A
Hs00153153_m1
76
603348
89
ID1
Hs00357821_g1
62
600349
90
ID3
Hs00171409_m1
129
600277
91
MADH1 (SMAD1)
Hs00195432_m1
67
601595
Other related genes
92
ENG (endoglin)
Hs00164438_m1
81
131195
93
PTGS1 (cox-1)
Hs00168776_m1
109
176805
94
PTGS2 (cox-2)
Hs00153133_m1
75
600262
95
B2M (Housekeeping)
Hs99999907_m1
75
109700
96
18S (Housekeeping)
Hs99999901_s1
187
180473
Results
Histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterisation
Comparing speed of growth in murine passages, we observed a similar average growth speed in SS (0.142 mm/day) and in GIST (0.103 mm/day)(Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Graphics of speed of growth in both tumours throughout the passages in nude mice.
TMAs
No morphological changes were observed between passages in GIST; however, a high number of mitoses were clearly observed in the passages in both tumours (Figures 2B and 2F). The IHC study of GIST showed intense expression of vimentin, CD117, DOG1, desmin, and CD34 (Figures 2C and 2D) and was negative for PDGFRα and S-100. Ki67 was expressed in 15% of tumour cells in all cores (Figure 2E).The IHC study of SS showed positivity for EMA (Figure 2G), cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and bcl-2. Intense positivity was also revealed for vimentin and weak expression for TLE1 in all passages. Ki67 increased slightly over the passages, being positive in 20% of tumour cells in the last passages (Figure 2H), whereas with GIST it was more constant.Double-immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that chemokine ligand expression in general was slightly higher in the xenograft passages than in the original tumour (Figure 3). There were very few differences between the two sarcomas with regard to chemokine expression profile. CXCL10 was constantly high in both tumours and GRO was mildly expressed in all passages (Figures 4A, 4D, and 4E). CXCL9 increased in both tumours over the passages (Figure 4B). Their receptors CXCR2 and CXCR3 were constantly expressed in all passages, with CXCR2 presenting a higher expression in SS. Finally, the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis was constantly overexpressed in all passages in both tumours (Figures 4C and 4F).
Figure 3.
Graphics of chemokine ligand and receptor expression in both tumours throughout the passages in nude mice.
Figure 4.
Immunofluorescent expression of chemokines and their receptors in GIST and SS throughout the early, middle, and late passages and in the neovascularisation experiment. (A) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL10 (red) and its receptor CXCR3 (green) in GIST tumour cells in early passages (40X). (B) Immunofluorescence staining shows expression of chemokine ligand CXCL9 (red) in GIST tumour cells in later passages (40X). (C) double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL12 (green) and its receptor CXCR4 (red) in GIST tumour cells in middle passages (40X). (D) Immunofluorescence staining shows expression of chemokine ligand GRO (red) in SS tumour cells in middle passages (40X). (E) double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL10 (red) and its receptor CXCR3 (green) in SS tumour cells in late passages (40X). (F) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows high coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL12 (green) and its receptor CXCR4 (red) in SS tumour cells in late passages (40X). (G) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand GRO (red) and its receptor CXCR2 (green) in SS tumour cells 24 h after xenografting (40X). (H) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand GRO (red) and its receptor CXCR2 (green) in GIST tumour cells in the control tumour (40X). (I) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL12 (green) and its receptor CXCR4 (red) in GIST tumour cells two weeks after xenotransplantation (40X), observe the different expression between murine stroma (arrow) and tumour cells (asterisk).
Neovascularisation experiments
In our neovascularisation experiments, during the first hours after xenografting, peritumoral haemorrhagic areas with inflammatory infiltration compounded by lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, karyorrhectic, and apoptotic figures were observed in SS and GIST. Small capillaries surrounded the xenograft associated with mesenchymal angioblastic and non-angioblastic cells included in a loose matrix.Patchy hypoxic necrosis in SS appeared within the first 96 h after implantation, reaching a peak extension in the third week. The SS presented characteristic adipose tissue infiltrate and peritumoral skeletal muscle mouse fibres, but without the pseudocapsule observed in GIST. In GIST, the massive necrosis appeared during the first week, earlier than in the SS. After the fourth week, the histological picture of the GIST was re-established, with features similar to those of the human control, re-establishing also the amount of mitoses and the remission of necrosis, which became patchy and scant. During the third week after xenografting, the inflammatory component decreased. At this time, newly formed capillary vessels were remodelled and penetrated or sprouted into the tumour.Areas of massive necrosis were associated with a lower proliferative index in both tumours. Ki67 was lower in the early stages after tumour xenografting in both tumours. In the last weeks, the increase in Ki67 expression was also inversely correlated with HIF1α in both neoplasms.Angiogenic factors represented by the VEGF family and their receptors presented a different expression profile in the two tumours. In SS, maximum VEGF positivity presented 24 h after implantation and was also expressed in the extracellular matrix, while VEGF positivity was lower in GIST and appeared 96 h after xenografting (Figure 2I). VEGFR2 presented a similar expression profile to its ligand, and VEGFR3 was the most positive receptor in both tumours. HIF1α expression was slightly higher and more constitutively expressed in SS than GISTDouble-immunofluorescence staining showed chemokine expression (CXCL9, CXCL10 and GRO) in the tumour cell cytoplasm/nucleus and deposited in the extracellular matrix. This was also the case for their receptors (CXCR3 and CXCR2) (Figures 4G and 4H). Chemokine ligand expression was higher during the first 48 h in GIST; however, it appeared later in SS where peak expression occurred during the first week. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis showed an intense coexpression in both sarcomas at all times throughout the experience. Interestingly, we observed that murine peritumoral stroma expressed CXCR4 but not CXCL12 in the two tumour xenografts (Figure 4I). It is worth mentioning that the chemokine receptors were expressed more constantly at all times in comparison with their ligands.
qRT-PCR low-density arrays of angiogenesis-related genes
Gene expression profiles (Figure 5) in GIST were similar at 24 h and 7 days but differed from those observed at 48 h, 14 and 21 days. However, SS expression profiles were similar at 24 h and 28 days, differing from those at 48 h and 14 days. In GIST, the early phase appeared 96 h after xenografting and was characterised by the overexpression of genes clearly involved in angiogenesis induction, including VEGF, PDGFA, PDGFB, VEGFC, and their receptors. In contrast, the earlier phase in SS occurred during the first week after xenografting. Finally, in GIST, the late phase of the angiogenic process (remodelling phase) appeared during the first week after xenografting, while in SS, this phase appeared later in the fourth week.
Figure 5.
Cluster tree of genes related to angiogenesis by qRT-PCR obtained from the Nu335 (SS) (A) and Nu407 (GIST) (B) series using distance correlation and applying a linear correlation coefficient at different times. Overexpressed genes are shown in dark red, underexpressed genes in dark blue and no change in white. Samples from third week in SS, and fourth week in GIST were not available for analysis (Table 2S and 3S).
RNA samples corresponding to the third week of SS and to the fourth week of GIST were not viable for analysis.
Discussion
Angiogenesis is critical for the growth and metastasis of tumours. Early in tumorigenesis, an angiogenic switch is activated by hypoxia, promoting the expression of pro-angiogenic growth factors, such as the VEGF family, its receptors, and HIF1α among others [7]. Recent publications have highlighted the difficulties in differentiating between GIST and monophasic intra-abdominal SS, where molecular mutations are sometimes the only distinguishing feature [27]. It has been suggested that it would be particularly informative to explore possible relationships between the presence of vasculogenic structures and the response to antiangiogenesis therapy [30, 31]. Furthermore, it is interesting to speculate that antiangiogenic therapy may result in a selective growth advantage for cells exhibiting vasculogenic mimicry and vascular co-option, promoting drug-induced resistance [30, 31].HIF1α is a principal regulator of cellular and systemic homeostatic response to hypoxia as it activates many genes, including those involved in angiogenesis [6]. In our model, HIF1α was overexpressed in the early stages, indicating that the angiogenic process is constitutively active in the xenotransplanted tumour. HIF1α plays an important role in angiogenic induction and remodelling phases and in an increased VEGF expression [32]. Some recent studies of GIST and chondrosarcoma have shown a correlation between the expression of angiogenic markers, such as VEGF and microvessel density, and a worse prognosis [33, 34], suggesting that the development of antiangiogenic chemotherapy might be useful. However, in other tumours, such as osteosarcoma, microvessel density seems to be associated with a longer overall and relapse-free survival [34, 35]. Imatinib continues to be used as a first-line medical treatment for advanced GIST, although resistance and non-response sometimes appear. Sunitinib and regorafenib, antiangiogenic drugs, are used as second- and third-line therapies, respectively, and are given in imatinib-resistant GIST cases [23]. Volumetric growth and the development of metastases in cases of GIST appear to be related to the development of a new vascular network [36]. The importance of vascularisation in the context of GIST is the action mechanism of the second-generation drug sunitinib, which is based on the blockade of VEGF activity along with tyrosine kinase receptor blockade that has been used with success in some GIST patients [37, 38].Anthracyclines and ifosfamide, either alone or in combination, are the gold standard treatments for advanced SS [39]. However, after failure of conventional first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy, available treatment options are severely limited because of a high risk-to-benefit ratio in terms of patient tolerability and survival. Recently, it has been demonstrated that pazopanib is a feasible option for patients who have been heavily pre-treated for metastatic SS [40].Cluster analysis performed on our qRT-PCR expression studies revealed two additional groups of genes clearly separated into two stages, corresponding to early angiogenic induction where VEGF and PDGF family genes among others play an important role, and the later remodelling phases where other angiogenic genes are overexpressed. Apparently the high-risk GIST behaved biologically as high-grade sarcoma in the passages and neovascularisation experiments similar to our previous molecular results [10]. However, induction and remodelling phases of SS appeared later than GIST and other high-grade bone tumours [10]. This difference may be related to a different sensibility and response to antiangiogenic drugs, with GIST being more sensitive. Nevertheless, we cannot be sure that this difference will have any biological translation.In addition to angiogenic factors, chemokines also play an important role during angiogenic induction. The coexpression of ligands and chemokine receptors in neoplastic cells and extracellular matrix suggests that autocrine and paracrine stimulation by the tumour cells results in production of angiogenic factors in response to hypoxia during the first stages of tumour growth, as reported in other neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions [8, 12, 30, 41]. Moreover, we found a correlation between high chemokine ligand expression and hypoxic necrosis in both tumours. Few studies of chemokines in SS and GIST have been made [42, 43]. CXCR4 expression has been related with poor prognosis in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas in a meta-analysis [17]. High expression of CXCL12/CXCR4 was observed in all passages of both tumours and in the neovascularisation experiment, this could be related with their aggressive clinical behaviour. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is related to mediating tumour cell invasion and proliferation and plays an important role in tumour angiogenesis, progression and metastasis [44]. CXCL12/CXCR4 is overexpressed by tumour cells, but not by murine stromal peritumoral cells which only produce CXCR4. Perhaps CXCL12 induces murine stromal cells to generate new vessels in a paracrine effect and may be a good objective for targeted therapy to reduce tumour growth.
Conclusions
This model provides information on the early stages of the angiogenic process in monophasic spindle-cell SS and high-risk GIST. We suggest that different angiogenic molecular profiles could predict different biological and clinical behaviour and determine the response to antiangiogenic treatment. We also demonstrate the importance of chemokine expression as a therapeutic target of tumour growth.The fact that angiogenesis is a dynamic, changing and multistep process over time should be taken into consideration when developing future therapeutic strategies in soft-tissue tumours.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Table 2.
Supplementary. 2-DDCt values corresponding to the Nu335 series.
Gene_Symbol
24 h
48 h
96 h
1 week
2 week
3 week
4 week
ADAMTS1-Hs00199608_m1
0.7959605
0.03487536
2.2625384
1.1141776
0.010976258
1.7567259
AMOT-Hs00611096_m1
0.26376235
0.05707947
0.37297338
0.5533971
5.48E-04
0.6260453
ANG;RNASE4-Hs00265741_s1
8.801705
0.049484883
23.473007
7.5595713
0.015574286
2.9783483
ANGPT1-Hs00181613_m1
0.009880596
0.05084049
1.1490225
1.854033
0.016000934
1.1941226
ANGPT2-Hs00169867_m1
3.6326275
0.03473391
16.737255
10.326439
0.01093174
10.955148
CCL2-Hs00234140_m1
2.683348
0.16359264
13.288964
2.8040843
0.05148721
1.0333282
CD36-Hs00169627_m1
0.053531617
0.2754463
1.3808194
1.1198069
0.0866907
1.021473
CDH5-Hs00174344_m1
0.31543005
0.1952118
1.5071367
3.5636954
0.06143865
0.7977747
CHGA-Hs00154441_m1
NV
NV
NV
32.096264
NV
4.5581665
COL18A1-Hs00181017_m1
0.23082852
5.42E-04
0.277198
0.50039613
1.71E-04
1.3184813
CXCL1-Hs00236937_m1
27.300922
NV
89.66844
32.197247
NV
NV
EDG1-Hs00173499_m1
0.059957597
0.006040307
1.2171141
0.56891876
0.001901055
0.5275882
EFNA2-Hs00154858_m1
1.2024206
0.030415064
2.0298295
2.827156
0.009572477
5.3208594
EFNA5-Hs00157342_m1
0.24109949
2.847728
0.9345426
1.2443724
0.58063984
2.1034224
EFNB2-Hs00187950_m1
0.23342909
0.001960718
0.57025087
0.5076365
6.17E-04
0.87659615
EGF-Hs00153181_m1
0.038981758
0.20058018
1.7117009
0.016707698
0.063128226
0.013953778
EGFR-Hs00193306_m1
1.1801668
0.008366582
5.0673194
3.822592
0.002633199
5.079238
ENG-Hs00164438_m1
0.20527008
0.016204517
0.41111425
0.6621962
0.005100017
0.94549626
EPHB4-Hs00174752_m1
0.21828675
0.004649402
0.34418315
0.44173142
0.004203849
0.56949294
ERBB2;LEMD2-Hs00397754_m1
0.46552873
0.00398609
0.5910703
0.673706
0.001254535
0.79151744
ETS1-Hs00428287_m1
0.49607438
0.15065551
4.2109904
1.3082498
0.08166007
1.3172712
FGF1-Hs00265254_m1
NV
41.08322
72.76203
120.863304
11.979111
26.906906
FGF2-Hs00266645_m1
0.17037809
0.04496078
0.62800163
0.09589044
0.014150422
0.33385146
FGF7-Hs00384281_m1
42.009033
89.45992
52.361824
112.07813
0.17391264
214.21053
FGFR1-Hs00241111_m1
0.68052554
5.25E-04
2.3998103
1.0269998
1.65E-04
1.056858
FGFR2-Hs00240792_m1
6.43E-04
0.003308094
5.33E-04
2.76E-04
0.019054554
2.30E-04
FGFR3-Hs00179829_m1
0.47414583
0.010906449
0.5086395
0.9106528
0.003432566
0.87494045
FGFR4-Hs00242558_m1
0.003453373
0.017769288
0.002865036
0.01827872
0.005592495
0.043755062
FIGF-Hs00189521_m1
1.0680918
0.28433153
0.96531004
1.8435278
0.08948714
0.71032244
FLT1-Hs00176573_m1
14.741555
0.31529078
18.3541
25.0587
0.099230886
66.39617
FLT4-Hs01047679_m1
1.6021613
0.22230674
1.8908751
1.8908751
0.06996619
0.638229
FN1-Hs00415006_m1
0.009271171
0.001936899
0.31474605
0.31758147
3.59E-05
0.38421825
HGF-Hs00300159_m1
0.74494153
0.28053638
2.331105
2.4146729
0.088292696
6.643718
HIF1A-Hs00153153_m1
5.79E-04
2.21E-04
0.002376824
1.50E-04
6.96E-05
1.54E-05
HPSE-Hs00180737_m1
0.49950182
2.8662815
1.926133
2.6158357
2.3470185
3.2462463
ID1-Hs00357821_g1
0.73769003
9.48E-04
2.9761086
2.6793191
2.98E-04
0.79354596
ID3-Hs00171409_m1
0.31624177
0.004542778
3.55751
4.1943107
0.00142974
0.5460467
IFNA1-Hs00256882_s1
17.625673
0.022310615
33.60883
2.8208911
0.0561009
0.001552084
IFNB1-Hs00277188_s1
270.98575
10.319205
2313.754
2928.3418
0.08540048
1875.1154
IGF1-Hs00153126_m1
0.8666961
0.050800312
2.1075785
0.8580654
0.015988288
0.26206714
IGF1R-Hs00181385_m1
0.38215917
0.010849698
0.93247163
0.640436
0.003414705
0.7276512
IL10-Hs00174086_m1
458.27228
NV
3026.768
2293.5767
NV
2484.658
IL12A-Hs00168405_m1
0.567523
0.22941716
0.98875076
0.84497744
0.07220404
1.0499607
IL8-Hs00174103_m1
16.041344
0.13745503
85.10393
68.07324
0.043260965
86.558304
ITGA5-Hs00233743_m1
0.04292659
0.004046804
0.22571458
0.5543176
0.001273643
0.6485964
ITGAV-Hs00233808_m1
3.62E-04
0.001865129
0.005105441
0.001578465
5.87E-04
1.30E-04
ITGB3-Hs00173978_m1
0.63354474
0.15661171
5.783896
0.8021871
0.049290113
0.25538987
KDR-Hs00176676_m1
0.049058992
0.25243247
0.04070101
1.8342797
0.079447605
1.1495711
MDK-Hs00171064_m1
5.30E-05
2.73E-04
4.40E-05
2.27E-05
8.59E-05
1.90E-05
MMP2-Hs00234422_m1
0.19907643
1.38E-04
0.87531877
1.2991811
4.35E-05
1.2406509
MMP9-Hs00234579_m1
2.7669928
0.17505844
7.6940885
5.5476108
0.055095818
4.2932944
NRP1-Hs00826129_m1
0.12803793
7.99E-04
0.4838971
0.84648466
0.003289067
0.93841285
PDGFA-Hs00234994_m1
0.4389812
0.002506821
0.8385384
0.43000203
7.89E-04
1.611485
PDGFB-Hs00234042_m1
1.2534354
0.016952496
2.7536328
1.3462225
0.005335427
0.8673197
PDGFRA-Hs00183486_m1
0.019641923
2.46E-04
0.037229206
0.003201435
7.74E-05
5.76E-04
PDGFRB-Hs00182163_m1
0.26188913
0.035274055
1.1167214
2.384623
0.011101739
1.1476152
PGF-Hs00182176_m1
2.9858983
0.024673844
7.7015076
5.086536
0.007765553
6.028427
PLAU-Hs00170182_m1
1.1980854
0.27836916
1.982732
1.4934684
0.08761061
0.44911763
PRL-Hs00168730_m1
0.106087364
0.54587126
2.3486202
0.04546936
0.17180106
0.4713016
PTGS1-Hs00168776_m1
0.053466685
0.2751122
0.04435778
0.4627111
0.08658555
0.39559445
PTGS2-Hs00153133_m1
345.7538
0.5678802
1413.4844
1064.7853
0.1787279
1878.3756
PTN-Hs00383235_m1
0.18134442
0.007857767
0.64166147
1.232515
0.002473061
4.575156
SERPINF1-Hs00171467_m1
0.073242776
2.50E-04
0.38210613
0.7587081
7.86E-05
2.3391302
SMAD1-Hs00195432_m1
1.1732796
0.002044792
3.2746916
8.598647
6.44E-04
18.83404
SPARC-Hs00277762_m1
0.1108581
0.001018303
0.63713557
0.6971213
2.43E-04
0.76808304
TEK-Hs00176096_m1
0.68615204
0.10372496
0.37136102
0.4196441
0.032645162
0.68975556
TGFA-Hs00177401_m1
0.007058851
4.596679
0.19149838
0.26590338
0.105379626
1.2052153
TGFB1-Hs00171257_m1
0.10877489
0.004435655
1.9193434
1.6530409
0.001396026
1.7242657
TGFB2-Hs00234244_m1
0.13737491
0.001103383
3.099895
3.3531804
3.47E-04
1.0426474
TGFB3-Hs00234245_m1
0.15789403
0.00436108
1.0450748
1.0556368
0.001372555
0.9004825
TGFBR1-Hs00610319_m1
0.09502458
0.004009001
2.2182114
1.4024074
0.001261745
1.632517
TGFBR2-Hs00234253_m1
31.741417
14.806774
75.4627
98.78798
0.070976205
58.946075
TGFBR3-Hs00234257_m1
0.0168747
0.002223517
0.10899068
0.1265091
7.00E-04
0.093545
THBS1-Hs00170236_m1
0.02627843
0.013971536
0.05666908
0.07892739
0.004397236
0.080069
THBS2-Hs00170248_m1
0.24877942
0.00247538
0.5332035
0.46211198
7.79E-04
0.99361634
THBS3-Hs00200157_m1
0.057871778
0.010964321
0.81936586
1.063532
0.00345078
1.3852974
THBS4-Hs00170261_m1
0.25605658
0.041287363
1.055909
2.2569547
0.012994295
1.6387945
TIE1-Hs00178500_m1
14.531259
NV
NV
8.991988
NV
5.8403964
TIMP1-Hs00171558_m1
0.09594396
0.001097487
1.7285247
2.1242523
3.45E-04
2.5862403
TIMP2-Hs00234278_m1
0.23860645
0.001554409
0.8069738
0.8414052
4.48E-05
0.7541748
TNFSF15-Hs00353710_s1
8.819573
0.09758525
13.036365
1.5936899
0.030712826
0.28507906
VEGF-Hs00173626_m1
10.268918
0.004262844
12.111028
4.5594625
0.001341637
0.90244776
VEGFB-Hs00173634_m1
0.04733373
0.001347965
0.0785328
0.041420598
1.1771686
0.013903745
VEGFC-Hs00153458_m1
85.88848
NV
130.90923
236.45436
NV
379.6854
Table 3.
Supplementary. 2-DDCt values corresponding to the Nu407 series.
Authors: Daisy W J van der Schaft; Femke Hillen; Patrick Pauwels; Dawn A Kirschmann; Karolien Castermans; Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink; Maxine G B Tran; Rafael Sciot; Esther Hauben; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Olivier Delattre; Patrick H Maxwell; Mary J C Hendrix; Arjan W Griffioen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M P Link; A M Goorin; A W Miser; A A Green; C B Pratt; J B Belasco; J Pritchard; J S Malpas; A R Baker; J A Kirkpatrick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Aki Vehtari; Jaakko Riihimäki; Toshirou Nishida; Sonja E Steigen; Peter Brabec; Lukas Plank; Bengt Nilsson; Claudia Cirilli; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Bordoni; Magnus K Magnusson; Zdenek Linke; Jozef Sufliarsky; Massimo Federico; Jon G Jonasson; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piotr Rutkowski Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Michael Kreuter; Ralf Bieker; Stefan S Bielack; Tanja Auras; Horst Buerger; Georg Gosheger; Heribert Jurgens; Wolfgang E Berdel; Rolf M Mesters Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stavros P Papadakos; Christos Tsagkaris; Marios Papadakis; Andreas S Papazoglou; Dimitrios V Moysidis; Constantinos G Zografos; Stamatios Theocharis Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2022-08-15