Literature DB >> 28386296

High-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) and synovial sarcoma display similar angiogenic profiles: a nude mice xenograft study.

Francisco Giner1, Isidro Machado2, Jose Antonio Lopez-Guerrero3, Empar Mayordomo-Aranda1, Antonio Llombart-Bosch1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract. Spindle cell monophasic synovial sarcoma (SS) can be morphologically similar. Angiogenesis is a major factor for tumour growth and metastasis. Our aim was to compare the angiogenic expression profiles of high-risk GIST and spindle cell monophasic SS by histological, immunohistochemical and molecular characterisation of the neovascularisation established between xenotransplanted tumours and the host during the initial phases of growth in nude mice.
METHODS: The angiogenic profile of two xenotransplanted human soft-tissue tumours were evaluated in 15 passages in nude mice using tissue microarrays (TMA). Tumour pieces were also implanted subcutaneously on the backs of 14 athymic Balb-c nude mice. The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 96 h; and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after implantation to perform histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular studies (neovascularisation experiments).
RESULTS: Morphological similarities were apparent in the early stages of neoplastic growth of these two soft-tissue tumours throughout the passages in nude mice and in the two neovascularisation experiments. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated overexpression of pro-angiogenic factors between 24 h and 96 h after xenotransplantation in both tumours. Additionally, neoplastic cells coexpressed chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, GRO, and CXCL12) and their receptors in both tumours. Molecular studies showed two expression profiles, revealing an early and a late phase in the angiogenic process.
CONCLUSION: This model could provide information on the early stages of the angiogenic process in monophasic spindle cell SS and high-risk GIST and offers an excellent way to study possible tumour response to antiangiogenic drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GIST; angiogenesis; chemokines; nude mice xenograft; synovial sarcoma

Year:  2017        PMID: 28386296      PMCID: PMC5365342          DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience        ISSN: 1754-6605


Introduction

High-grade sarcomas can be implanted into immunodeficient mice, where they grow as xenografts supported by the murine stroma blood supply [1]. In general, transplantations of low-grade tumours fail to establish, with successful xenografts deriving mainly from aggressive neoplasms. Although some properties of the original tumours may not be fully represented, xenografts have become very useful models for preclinical experiments in cancer research [2-5]. In recent years, much research has focused on the role of angiogenesis in tumour development, growth, invasion, and metastasis [6, 7]. It has become clear that tumour angiogenesis is the result of an imbalance between proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, the threshold of change in favour of proangiogenesis is considered to be the angiogenic switch. Several angiogenic factors and chemokines related with angiogenic mechanisms have been studied in different tumour types [6, 8, 9]. We recently communicated these findings in a nude mice osteosarcoma model [10] as well as in two high-grade chondrosarcomas (in press) [11]. The angiogenic process presents two different phases of tumour growth. An initial induction phase, in which new unstable vessels are built, followed by a remodelling phase, in which blood vessels are stabilised [12]. At this point, hypoxia occurs and the angiogenic process is activated through the well-known hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF) that induce the expression of several tumour-derived cytokines, such as vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) or fibroblast growth factors (FGF) [6] and some chemokines (GRO, CXCL9, and CXCL10) with their respective receptors (CXCR2 and CXCR3) [8, 13, 14]. More recently, the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis was reported to be involved in mediating tumour cell invasion and proliferation and to play an important role in tumour angiogenesis, progression, and metastasis [15, 16]. Moreover, CXCR4 expression has been associated with poor survival in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas [17, 18] and many types of carcinomas [19]. Consequently, considerable interest has been generated in the therapeutic potential of targeting the growth of new vessels (antiangiogenesis) and the capacity to control those that have already been formed (vascular targeting) [13, 20]. Soft-tissue sarcomas are an infrequent group of mesenchymal tumours, they may be high grade and display poor survival [21]. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract and spans a clinical spectrum from benign to malignant; most cases contain KIT- or PDGFRA-activating mutations [22]. Mutations in different genes may also be present, [23] although the main prognostic factors are tumour size, mitotic activity, location and capsular invasion [24, 25]. Targeted therapy with imatinib is indicated for high-risk cases and in advanced disease [23]. Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a mesenchymal tumour with a variable degree of epithelial differentiation and a specific chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11;q11) that leads to the formation of an SS18–SSX fusion gene. The differential diagnosis with a high-grade GIST may be difficult [26, 27]. Both tumour types cause metastasis and display an aggressive behaviour, suggesting that molecular reorganisations such as of SYTSSX gene translocation and KIT mutations might be similarly essential for the growth of angiogenic factors. A recent publication described an intra-abdominal monophasic spindle cell SS that mimicked the morphology and immunohistochemistry of a high-risk spindle cell GIST [27]. Several animal models have been used in the study of tumour angiogenesis [12, 14, 28]. Studying angiogenesis through a xenograft model in high-grade sarcomas such as high-risk GIST and synovial sarcomas (SS) may provide a better understanding of this process and increase information regarding potential candidates for effective targeted therapy. We developed a xenograft nude mice model to clarify the presence of angiogenic factors within the neoformed peritumoral stroma and in the internal tumour blood supply, during the early stages of tumour growth after the transfer into the subcutaneous tissue of the host. To this end, we used two previously established xenotransplanted tumour cell lines of human sarcomas: a high-risk spindle cell GIST and a monophasic spindle cell SS [22, 29]. Our aim was to characterise the markers associated with vasculogenesis using histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular techniques and to search for similarities that may exist between the two tumours.

Materials and methods

Samples

Samples were collected from patients treated at the Hospital Clínic Universitari de Valencia. The GIST came from a 63-year-old male with a gastric mass of approximately 26 × 20 × 35 cm diagnosed as a high-risk spindle cell tumour (Figure 2A). Firstly, the GIST was treated with imatinib (400 mg/day) for six months. The tumour responded partially to targeted therapy and finally resection of the mass was decided upon seven months after diagnosis. No metastasis was seen at the moment of diagnosis, but the patient died of various surgical complications after resection.
Figure 2.

(A) GIST with spindle-cell pattern (H&E, 20X). (B) High-risk GIST with some mitotic figures (H&E, 40X). (C) Intense positivity of DOG-1 in GIST, 40X. (D) Intense positivity of CD34 in GIST, 40X. (E) High proliferative Ki67 index in late passages of GIST, 40X. (F) Monomorphic spindle-cell pattern in SS (H&E, 40X). (G) Mild EMA positivity in SS, 40X. (H) High proliferative Ki67 index in late passages of SS, 40X. (I) Intense VEGF expression in SS 24 h after tumour implantation, 40X.

The SS came from a 32-year-old male who attended our hospital with a relapse in the right thigh and multiple lung metastases after chemo-radiotherapy. The tumour was approximately 10 × 8 × 8 cm and was diagnosed as monophasic spindle-cell SS, the patient died of tumour progression several months after diagnosis. Molecular biology studies revealed genomic alterations in both tumours. The GIST had the KIT gene mutation and the SS had the typical translocation t(X,18)(SYT-SSX). The tumours were collected for histopathological, ultrastructural, and genetic characterisation at our Pathology Department. The original tumours were transferred subcutaneously on the backs of nude mice (Nu407 and Nu335) and maintained for several generations (passages). In both tumours, we divided the passages into three time periods, early passages (from 1st to 5th passage), middle passages (from 6th to 10th passage) and late passages (from 11th to 15th passage). We calculated the average speed of tumour growth in both nude mice passages (Nu335 and Nu407) according to the formula (15 mm/days to next passage), 15 mm being the approximate tumour size when mice were sacrificed. Tumour pieces 3–4 mm in size from the early passages of Nu407 and Nu335 were also xenografted subcutaneously on the backs of two sets of athymic Balb-c nude mice (n = 14 each). The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48, and 96 h; and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after implantation (neovascularisation experiments). Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, and haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed for histological analysis. Moreover non-fixed samples were collected for molecular analysis. Approval for animal experimentation was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Universitat de València Estudi General (UVEG).

Assembly of TMAs

Tissue microarrays were constructed using a Manual Tissue Arrayer (Beecher Instruments, Sun Praire, WI). Two cores (1 mm thick) of each sample were included, with additional cores in cases with diverse morphologic areas. The TMA contained normal tissue controls, original tumour, and the corresponding xenograft passages. The cores were grouped into early transfers 1–5, middle passages 6–10, and late passages 11–15. After assembly, an initial section from each TMA was stained with haematoxylineosin to evaluate the viability of the samples. Several 5-mm sections were also prepared for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Table 1 summarises the antibodies used for the IHC.
Table 1.

Antibodies used in the experiences.

MarkerClonality (Clon)LocationDilutionManufacturer
Ki-67Monoclonal (MIB-1)Nuclear1/50Dako
HIF1 αMonoclonal (HI α 67)Cytoplasm1/500Chemicon
VEGFMonoclonal (VG 1)Cytoplasm1/100Neomarkers
VEGFR1Polyclonal (rabbit)Cytoplasm/membrane1/400Santa Cruz
VEGRF2Polyclonal (rabbit)Cytoplasm/membrane1/400Santa Cruz
VEGFR3Polyclonal (rabbit)Cytoplasm/membrane1/400Santa Cruz
PDGFR αPolyclonal (rabbit)Cytoplasm1/100Santa Cruz
FGF 2Polyclonal (rabbit)Cytoplasm1/200Santa Cruz
VE- CADPolyclonal (goat)Cytoplasm/membrane1/50Santa Cruz
CXCL9Polyclonal (goat)Cytoplasm1/100R&DSystems
CXCL10Polyclonal (goat)Nuclear/cytoplasm1/100R&DSystems
GROMonoclonal (31716)Cytoplasm1/200R&DSystems
CXCL12Monoclonal(79018)Cytoplasm1/60R&DSystems
CXCR3Monoclonal (2Ar1)Cytoplasm/membrane1/200Abcam
CXCR2Polyclonal(mouse)Cytoplasm/membrane1/20BioLegend
CXCR4Monoclonal(44716)Nuclear1/150R&DSystems
VimentineMonoclonal (V9)Cytoplasm1/300Novocastra
DOG-1Monoclonal (BV10)Cytoplasm1/50DBS
CD117Polyclonal (rabbit)Membrane/cytoplasm1/100Dako
TLE-1Polyclonal (rabbit)Nuclear1/50Santa Cruz
CD34Monoclonal (QBEnd10)Cytoplasmpre-dilutedDako
S-100Polyclonal (rabbit)Cytoplasm1/2000Dako
DesminMonoclonal (D33)Cytoplasmpre-dilutedDako
EMAMonoclonal (E29)Cytoplasm/membrane1/200Dako
CK(AE1/AE3)Monoclonal (AE1/AE3)Cytoplasm/membrane1/100Dako
BCL-2Monoclonal (3.1)Nuclear1/50Novocastra

Immunohistochemistry

IHC was carried out by an indirect peroxidase method on paraffin sections following the same methodology, as we discussed in our previous papers [10] and [11].

Molecular biology

RNA was extracted from 50 to 200 mg of tumour samples obtained from the NU335 and Nu407 series. The whole methodology and studied genes (Table 1S) are also discussed in our previous papers [10] and [11].
Table 1.

Supplementary. Genes and assays included in the low-density array for the study of the expression of angiogenic factors by quantitative RT-PCR.

S.NoGene symbolAssay references(Applied Biosystems)Amplicon size (pb)OMIM
1AMOT (angiomotin)Hs00611096_m165300410
2ANG (angiogenina)Hs00265741_s191105850
3ANGPT1 (angiopoietin-1)Hs00181613_m187601667
4ANGPT2 (angiopoietin-2)Hs00169867_m173601922
5CHGA (Vasostatin/Chromogranin-A)Hs00154441_m1115118910
Growth factors and receptors
6Ephrin 2A (EFNA2)Hs00154858_m189602756
7Ephrin-A5 (EFNA5)Hs00157342_m198601535
8Ephrin-B2 (EFNB2)Hs00187950_m163600527
9EPHB4 (Ephrin B4)Hs00174752_m182600011
10FGF1 (aFGF)Hs00265254_m165131220
11FGF2 (bFGF)Hs00266645_m182134920
12FGF4Hs00173564_m153164980
13FGF6Hs00173934_m164134921
14FGF7Hs00384281_m185148180
15FGFR1Hs00241111_m181136350
16FGFR2 (KGFR)Hs00240792_m177176943
17FGFR3Hs00179829_m1104134934
18FGFR4Hs00242558_m174134935
19PDGFAHs00234994_m193173430
20PDGFBHs00234042_m180190040
21PDGFRAHs00183486_m192173490
22PDGFRBHs00182163_m186173410
23PF4 (Platelet factor 4)Hs00236998_m186173460
24TGFAHs00177401_m195190170
25TGFB1Hs00171257_m163190180
26TGFB2Hs00234244_m192190220
27TGFB3Hs00234245_m175190230
28TGFBR1Hs00610319_m1126190181
29TGFBR2Hs00234253_m170190182
30TGFBR3Hs00234257_m160600742
31FIGF (VEGFD)Hs00189521_m1130300091
32FLK1 (KDR)Hs00176676_m184191306
33FLT1 (VEGFR2)Hs00176573_m155165070
34PGFHs00182176_m156601121
35VEGFHs00173626_m177192240
36VEGFBHs00173634_m169601398
37VEGFCHs00153458_m1126601528
38FLT4 (VEGFR3)Hs01047679_m189136352
39CD36Hs00169627_m177173510
40EDG1Hs00173499_m1102601974
41EGFHs00153181_m195131530
42EGFRHs00193306_m169131550
43GRO1 (CXCL1)Hs00236937_m170155730
44HGF (Scatter factor)Hs00300159_m192142409
45IGF1Hs00153126_m170147440
46IGF1RHs00181385_m177147370
47TEK (Tie-2)Hs00176096_m182600221
48TIE1Hs00178500_m174600222
Cytokines and chemokines
49CSF3Hs00236884_m178138970
50IFNA1Hs00256882_s1115147660
51IFNB1Hs00277188_s1134147640
52IFNGHs00174143_m179147570
53IL10Hs00174086_m1119124092
54IL12AHs00168405_m167161560
55IL8Hs00174103_m1101146930
56MDKHs00171064_m1102162096
57NRP1 (neuropilin-1)Hs00826129_m197602069
58PRL (prolactin)Hs00168730_m176176760
59PTN (pleiotrophin)Hs00383235_m176162095
60SCYA2Hs00234140_m1101158105
61SPARCHs00277762_m1122182120
62TNFAHs00174128_m180191160
63TNFSF15 (VEGI)Hs00353710_s197604052
Adhesion molecules
64CDH5 (VE-Cadherin)Hs00174344_m166601120
65ITGA5 (integrin a5)Hs00233743_m186135620
66ITGAV (integrin aV)Hs00233808_m164193210
67ITGB3Hs00173978_m189173470
68PECAM1 (CD31)Hs00169777_m165173445
Matrix Proteins, Proteases and Inhibitors
69ADAMTS1 (METH1)Hs00199608_m168605174
70ADAMTS8 (METH2)Hs00199836_m159605175
71COL18A1 (LOC51695/endostatin)Hs00181017_m172120328
72FN1 (fibronectin)Hs00415006_m186135600
73HPSE (heparanase)Hs00180737_m159604724
74MMP2Hs00234422_m183120360
75MMP9Hs00234579_m154120361
76MSR1Hs00234012_m180153622
77PLAU (uPA)Hs00170182_m1104191840
78SERPINB5 (maspin)Hs00184728_m1104154790
79SERPINF1 (PEDF)Hs00171467_m188172860
80THBS1Hs00170236_m1109188060
81THBS2Hs00170248_m187188061
82THBS3Hs00200157_m185188062
83THBS4Hs00170261_m198600715
83TIMP1Hs00171558_m1104305370
85TIMP2Hs00234278_m173188825
Transcription factors
86ERBB2Hs00397754_m158164870
87ETS1Hs00428287_m192164720
88HIF1AHs00153153_m176603348
89ID1Hs00357821_g162600349
90ID3Hs00171409_m1129600277
91MADH1 (SMAD1)Hs00195432_m167601595
Other related genes
92ENG (endoglin)Hs00164438_m181131195
93PTGS1 (cox-1)Hs00168776_m1109176805
94PTGS2 (cox-2)Hs00153133_m175600262
95B2M (Housekeeping)Hs99999907_m175109700
9618S (Housekeeping)Hs99999901_s1187180473

Results

Histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterisation

Comparing speed of growth in murine passages, we observed a similar average growth speed in SS (0.142 mm/day) and in GIST (0.103 mm/day)(Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Graphics of speed of growth in both tumours throughout the passages in nude mice.

TMAs

No morphological changes were observed between passages in GIST; however, a high number of mitoses were clearly observed in the passages in both tumours (Figures 2B and 2F). The IHC study of GIST showed intense expression of vimentin, CD117, DOG1, desmin, and CD34 (Figures 2C and 2D) and was negative for PDGFRα and S-100. Ki67 was expressed in 15% of tumour cells in all cores (Figure 2E). The IHC study of SS showed positivity for EMA (Figure 2G), cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and bcl-2. Intense positivity was also revealed for vimentin and weak expression for TLE1 in all passages. Ki67 increased slightly over the passages, being positive in 20% of tumour cells in the last passages (Figure 2H), whereas with GIST it was more constant. Double-immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that chemokine ligand expression in general was slightly higher in the xenograft passages than in the original tumour (Figure 3). There were very few differences between the two sarcomas with regard to chemokine expression profile. CXCL10 was constantly high in both tumours and GRO was mildly expressed in all passages (Figures 4A, 4D, and 4E). CXCL9 increased in both tumours over the passages (Figure 4B). Their receptors CXCR2 and CXCR3 were constantly expressed in all passages, with CXCR2 presenting a higher expression in SS. Finally, the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis was constantly overexpressed in all passages in both tumours (Figures 4C and 4F).
Figure 3.

Graphics of chemokine ligand and receptor expression in both tumours throughout the passages in nude mice.

Figure 4.

Immunofluorescent expression of chemokines and their receptors in GIST and SS throughout the early, middle, and late passages and in the neovascularisation experiment. (A) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL10 (red) and its receptor CXCR3 (green) in GIST tumour cells in early passages (40X). (B) Immunofluorescence staining shows expression of chemokine ligand CXCL9 (red) in GIST tumour cells in later passages (40X). (C) double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL12 (green) and its receptor CXCR4 (red) in GIST tumour cells in middle passages (40X). (D) Immunofluorescence staining shows expression of chemokine ligand GRO (red) in SS tumour cells in middle passages (40X). (E) double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL10 (red) and its receptor CXCR3 (green) in SS tumour cells in late passages (40X). (F) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows high coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL12 (green) and its receptor CXCR4 (red) in SS tumour cells in late passages (40X). (G) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand GRO (red) and its receptor CXCR2 (green) in SS tumour cells 24 h after xenografting (40X). (H) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand GRO (red) and its receptor CXCR2 (green) in GIST tumour cells in the control tumour (40X). (I) Double-immunofluorescence staining shows coexpression of chemokine ligand CXCL12 (green) and its receptor CXCR4 (red) in GIST tumour cells two weeks after xenotransplantation (40X), observe the different expression between murine stroma (arrow) and tumour cells (asterisk).

Neovascularisation experiments

In our neovascularisation experiments, during the first hours after xenografting, peritumoral haemorrhagic areas with inflammatory infiltration compounded by lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, karyorrhectic, and apoptotic figures were observed in SS and GIST. Small capillaries surrounded the xenograft associated with mesenchymal angioblastic and non-angioblastic cells included in a loose matrix. Patchy hypoxic necrosis in SS appeared within the first 96 h after implantation, reaching a peak extension in the third week. The SS presented characteristic adipose tissue infiltrate and peritumoral skeletal muscle mouse fibres, but without the pseudocapsule observed in GIST. In GIST, the massive necrosis appeared during the first week, earlier than in the SS. After the fourth week, the histological picture of the GIST was re-established, with features similar to those of the human control, re-establishing also the amount of mitoses and the remission of necrosis, which became patchy and scant. During the third week after xenografting, the inflammatory component decreased. At this time, newly formed capillary vessels were remodelled and penetrated or sprouted into the tumour. Areas of massive necrosis were associated with a lower proliferative index in both tumours. Ki67 was lower in the early stages after tumour xenografting in both tumours. In the last weeks, the increase in Ki67 expression was also inversely correlated with HIF1α in both neoplasms. Angiogenic factors represented by the VEGF family and their receptors presented a different expression profile in the two tumours. In SS, maximum VEGF positivity presented 24 h after implantation and was also expressed in the extracellular matrix, while VEGF positivity was lower in GIST and appeared 96 h after xenografting (Figure 2I). VEGFR2 presented a similar expression profile to its ligand, and VEGFR3 was the most positive receptor in both tumours. HIF1α expression was slightly higher and more constitutively expressed in SS than GIST Double-immunofluorescence staining showed chemokine expression (CXCL9, CXCL10 and GRO) in the tumour cell cytoplasm/nucleus and deposited in the extracellular matrix. This was also the case for their receptors (CXCR3 and CXCR2) (Figures 4G and 4H). Chemokine ligand expression was higher during the first 48 h in GIST; however, it appeared later in SS where peak expression occurred during the first week. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis showed an intense coexpression in both sarcomas at all times throughout the experience. Interestingly, we observed that murine peritumoral stroma expressed CXCR4 but not CXCL12 in the two tumour xenografts (Figure 4I). It is worth mentioning that the chemokine receptors were expressed more constantly at all times in comparison with their ligands.

qRT-PCR low-density arrays of angiogenesis-related genes

Gene expression profiles (Figure 5) in GIST were similar at 24 h and 7 days but differed from those observed at 48 h, 14 and 21 days. However, SS expression profiles were similar at 24 h and 28 days, differing from those at 48 h and 14 days. In GIST, the early phase appeared 96 h after xenografting and was characterised by the overexpression of genes clearly involved in angiogenesis induction, including VEGF, PDGFA, PDGFB, VEGFC, and their receptors. In contrast, the earlier phase in SS occurred during the first week after xenografting. Finally, in GIST, the late phase of the angiogenic process (remodelling phase) appeared during the first week after xenografting, while in SS, this phase appeared later in the fourth week.
Figure 5.

Cluster tree of genes related to angiogenesis by qRT-PCR obtained from the Nu335 (SS) (A) and Nu407 (GIST) (B) series using distance correlation and applying a linear correlation coefficient at different times. Overexpressed genes are shown in dark red, underexpressed genes in dark blue and no change in white. Samples from third week in SS, and fourth week in GIST were not available for analysis (Table 2S and 3S).

RNA samples corresponding to the third week of SS and to the fourth week of GIST were not viable for analysis.

Discussion

Angiogenesis is critical for the growth and metastasis of tumours. Early in tumorigenesis, an angiogenic switch is activated by hypoxia, promoting the expression of pro-angiogenic growth factors, such as the VEGF family, its receptors, and HIF1α among others [7]. Recent publications have highlighted the difficulties in differentiating between GIST and monophasic intra-abdominal SS, where molecular mutations are sometimes the only distinguishing feature [27]. It has been suggested that it would be particularly informative to explore possible relationships between the presence of vasculogenic structures and the response to antiangiogenesis therapy [30, 31]. Furthermore, it is interesting to speculate that antiangiogenic therapy may result in a selective growth advantage for cells exhibiting vasculogenic mimicry and vascular co-option, promoting drug-induced resistance [30, 31]. HIF1α is a principal regulator of cellular and systemic homeostatic response to hypoxia as it activates many genes, including those involved in angiogenesis [6]. In our model, HIF1α was overexpressed in the early stages, indicating that the angiogenic process is constitutively active in the xenotransplanted tumour. HIF1α plays an important role in angiogenic induction and remodelling phases and in an increased VEGF expression [32]. Some recent studies of GIST and chondrosarcoma have shown a correlation between the expression of angiogenic markers, such as VEGF and microvessel density, and a worse prognosis [33, 34], suggesting that the development of antiangiogenic chemotherapy might be useful. However, in other tumours, such as osteosarcoma, microvessel density seems to be associated with a longer overall and relapse-free survival [34, 35]. Imatinib continues to be used as a first-line medical treatment for advanced GIST, although resistance and non-response sometimes appear. Sunitinib and regorafenib, antiangiogenic drugs, are used as second- and third-line therapies, respectively, and are given in imatinib-resistant GIST cases [23]. Volumetric growth and the development of metastases in cases of GIST appear to be related to the development of a new vascular network [36]. The importance of vascularisation in the context of GIST is the action mechanism of the second-generation drug sunitinib, which is based on the blockade of VEGF activity along with tyrosine kinase receptor blockade that has been used with success in some GIST patients [37, 38]. Anthracyclines and ifosfamide, either alone or in combination, are the gold standard treatments for advanced SS [39]. However, after failure of conventional first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy, available treatment options are severely limited because of a high risk-to-benefit ratio in terms of patient tolerability and survival. Recently, it has been demonstrated that pazopanib is a feasible option for patients who have been heavily pre-treated for metastatic SS [40]. Cluster analysis performed on our qRT-PCR expression studies revealed two additional groups of genes clearly separated into two stages, corresponding to early angiogenic induction where VEGF and PDGF family genes among others play an important role, and the later remodelling phases where other angiogenic genes are overexpressed. Apparently the high-risk GIST behaved biologically as high-grade sarcoma in the passages and neovascularisation experiments similar to our previous molecular results [10]. However, induction and remodelling phases of SS appeared later than GIST and other high-grade bone tumours [10]. This difference may be related to a different sensibility and response to antiangiogenic drugs, with GIST being more sensitive. Nevertheless, we cannot be sure that this difference will have any biological translation. In addition to angiogenic factors, chemokines also play an important role during angiogenic induction. The coexpression of ligands and chemokine receptors in neoplastic cells and extracellular matrix suggests that autocrine and paracrine stimulation by the tumour cells results in production of angiogenic factors in response to hypoxia during the first stages of tumour growth, as reported in other neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions [8, 12, 30, 41]. Moreover, we found a correlation between high chemokine ligand expression and hypoxic necrosis in both tumours. Few studies of chemokines in SS and GIST have been made [42, 43]. CXCR4 expression has been related with poor prognosis in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas in a meta-analysis [17]. High expression of CXCL12/CXCR4 was observed in all passages of both tumours and in the neovascularisation experiment, this could be related with their aggressive clinical behaviour. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is related to mediating tumour cell invasion and proliferation and plays an important role in tumour angiogenesis, progression and metastasis [44]. CXCL12/CXCR4 is overexpressed by tumour cells, but not by murine stromal peritumoral cells which only produce CXCR4. Perhaps CXCL12 induces murine stromal cells to generate new vessels in a paracrine effect and may be a good objective for targeted therapy to reduce tumour growth.

Conclusions

This model provides information on the early stages of the angiogenic process in monophasic spindle-cell SS and high-risk GIST. We suggest that different angiogenic molecular profiles could predict different biological and clinical behaviour and determine the response to antiangiogenic treatment. We also demonstrate the importance of chemokine expression as a therapeutic target of tumour growth. The fact that angiogenesis is a dynamic, changing and multistep process over time should be taken into consideration when developing future therapeutic strategies in soft-tissue tumours.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Table 2.

Supplementary. 2-DDCt values corresponding to the Nu335 series.

Gene_Symbol24 h48 h96 h1 week2 week3 week4 week
ADAMTS1-Hs00199608_m10.79596050.034875362.26253841.11417760.0109762581.7567259
AMOT-Hs00611096_m10.263762350.057079470.372973380.55339715.48E-040.6260453
ANG;RNASE4-Hs00265741_s18.8017050.04948488323.4730077.55957130.0155742862.9783483
ANGPT1-Hs00181613_m10.0098805960.050840491.14902251.8540330.0160009341.1941226
ANGPT2-Hs00169867_m13.63262750.0347339116.73725510.3264390.0109317410.955148
CCL2-Hs00234140_m12.6833480.1635926413.2889642.80408430.051487211.0333282
CD36-Hs00169627_m10.0535316170.27544631.38081941.11980690.08669071.021473
CDH5-Hs00174344_m10.315430050.19521181.50713673.56369540.061438650.7977747
CHGA-Hs00154441_m1NVNVNV32.096264NV4.5581665
COL18A1-Hs00181017_m10.230828525.42E-040.2771980.500396131.71E-041.3184813
CXCL1-Hs00236937_m127.300922NV89.6684432.197247NVNV
EDG1-Hs00173499_m10.0599575970.0060403071.21711410.568918760.0019010550.5275882
EFNA2-Hs00154858_m11.20242060.0304150642.02982952.8271560.0095724775.3208594
EFNA5-Hs00157342_m10.241099492.8477280.93454261.24437240.580639842.1034224
EFNB2-Hs00187950_m10.233429090.0019607180.570250870.50763656.17E-040.87659615
EGF-Hs00153181_m10.0389817580.200580181.71170090.0167076980.0631282260.013953778
EGFR-Hs00193306_m11.18016680.0083665825.06731943.8225920.0026331995.079238
ENG-Hs00164438_m10.205270080.0162045170.411114250.66219620.0051000170.94549626
EPHB4-Hs00174752_m10.218286750.0046494020.344183150.441731420.0042038490.56949294
ERBB2;LEMD2-Hs00397754_m10.465528730.003986090.59107030.6737060.0012545350.79151744
ETS1-Hs00428287_m10.496074380.150655514.21099041.30824980.081660071.3172712
FGF1-Hs00265254_m1NV41.0832272.76203120.86330411.97911126.906906
FGF2-Hs00266645_m10.170378090.044960780.628001630.095890440.0141504220.33385146
FGF7-Hs00384281_m142.00903389.4599252.361824112.078130.17391264214.21053
FGFR1-Hs00241111_m10.680525545.25E-042.39981031.02699981.65E-041.056858
FGFR2-Hs00240792_m16.43E-040.0033080945.33E-042.76E-040.0190545542.30E-04
FGFR3-Hs00179829_m10.474145830.0109064490.50863950.91065280.0034325660.87494045
FGFR4-Hs00242558_m10.0034533730.0177692880.0028650360.018278720.0055924950.043755062
FIGF-Hs00189521_m11.06809180.284331530.965310041.84352780.089487140.71032244
FLT1-Hs00176573_m114.7415550.3152907818.354125.05870.09923088666.39617
FLT4-Hs01047679_m11.60216130.222306741.89087511.89087510.069966190.638229
FN1-Hs00415006_m10.0092711710.0019368990.314746050.317581473.59E-050.38421825
HGF-Hs00300159_m10.744941530.280536382.3311052.41467290.0882926966.643718
HIF1A-Hs00153153_m15.79E-042.21E-040.0023768241.50E-046.96E-051.54E-05
HPSE-Hs00180737_m10.499501822.86628151.9261332.61583572.34701853.2462463
ID1-Hs00357821_g10.737690039.48E-042.97610862.67931912.98E-040.79354596
ID3-Hs00171409_m10.316241770.0045427783.557514.19431070.001429740.5460467
IFNA1-Hs00256882_s117.6256730.02231061533.608832.82089110.05610090.001552084
IFNB1-Hs00277188_s1270.9857510.3192052313.7542928.34180.085400481875.1154
IGF1-Hs00153126_m10.86669610.0508003122.10757850.85806540.0159882880.26206714
IGF1R-Hs00181385_m10.382159170.0108496980.932471630.6404360.0034147050.7276512
IL10-Hs00174086_m1458.27228NV3026.7682293.5767NV2484.658
IL12A-Hs00168405_m10.5675230.229417160.988750760.844977440.072204041.0499607
IL8-Hs00174103_m116.0413440.1374550385.1039368.073240.04326096586.558304
ITGA5-Hs00233743_m10.042926590.0040468040.225714580.55431760.0012736430.6485964
ITGAV-Hs00233808_m13.62E-040.0018651290.0051054410.0015784655.87E-041.30E-04
ITGB3-Hs00173978_m10.633544740.156611715.7838960.80218710.0492901130.25538987
KDR-Hs00176676_m10.0490589920.252432470.040701011.83427970.0794476051.1495711
MDK-Hs00171064_m15.30E-052.73E-044.40E-052.27E-058.59E-051.90E-05
MMP2-Hs00234422_m10.199076431.38E-040.875318771.29918114.35E-051.2406509
MMP9-Hs00234579_m12.76699280.175058447.69408855.54761080.0550958184.2932944
NRP1-Hs00826129_m10.128037937.99E-040.48389710.846484660.0032890670.93841285
PDGFA-Hs00234994_m10.43898120.0025068210.83853840.430002037.89E-041.611485
PDGFB-Hs00234042_m11.25343540.0169524962.75363281.34622250.0053354270.8673197
PDGFRA-Hs00183486_m10.0196419232.46E-040.0372292060.0032014357.74E-055.76E-04
PDGFRB-Hs00182163_m10.261889130.0352740551.11672142.3846230.0111017391.1476152
PGF-Hs00182176_m12.98589830.0246738447.70150765.0865360.0077655536.028427
PLAU-Hs00170182_m11.19808540.278369161.9827321.49346840.087610610.44911763
PRL-Hs00168730_m10.1060873640.545871262.34862020.045469360.171801060.4713016
PTGS1-Hs00168776_m10.0534666850.27511220.044357780.46271110.086585550.39559445
PTGS2-Hs00153133_m1345.75380.56788021413.48441064.78530.17872791878.3756
PTN-Hs00383235_m10.181344420.0078577670.641661471.2325150.0024730614.575156
SERPINF1-Hs00171467_m10.0732427762.50E-040.382106130.75870817.86E-052.3391302
SMAD1-Hs00195432_m11.17327960.0020447923.27469168.5986476.44E-0418.83404
SPARC-Hs00277762_m10.11085810.0010183030.637135570.69712132.43E-040.76808304
TEK-Hs00176096_m10.686152040.103724960.371361020.41964410.0326451620.68975556
TGFA-Hs00177401_m10.0070588514.5966790.191498380.265903380.1053796261.2052153
TGFB1-Hs00171257_m10.108774890.0044356551.91934341.65304090.0013960261.7242657
TGFB2-Hs00234244_m10.137374910.0011033833.0998953.35318043.47E-041.0426474
TGFB3-Hs00234245_m10.157894030.004361081.04507481.05563680.0013725550.9004825
TGFBR1-Hs00610319_m10.095024580.0040090012.21821141.40240740.0012617451.632517
TGFBR2-Hs00234253_m131.74141714.80677475.462798.787980.07097620558.946075
TGFBR3-Hs00234257_m10.01687470.0022235170.108990680.12650917.00E-040.093545
THBS1-Hs00170236_m10.026278430.0139715360.056669080.078927390.0043972360.080069
THBS2-Hs00170248_m10.248779420.002475380.53320350.462111987.79E-040.99361634
THBS3-Hs00200157_m10.0578717780.0109643210.819365861.0635320.003450781.3852974
THBS4-Hs00170261_m10.256056580.0412873631.0559092.25695470.0129942951.6387945
TIE1-Hs00178500_m114.531259NVNV8.991988NV5.8403964
TIMP1-Hs00171558_m10.095943960.0010974871.72852472.12425233.45E-042.5862403
TIMP2-Hs00234278_m10.238606450.0015544090.80697380.84140524.48E-050.7541748
TNFSF15-Hs00353710_s18.8195730.0975852513.0363651.59368990.0307128260.28507906
VEGF-Hs00173626_m110.2689180.00426284412.1110284.55946250.0013416370.90244776
VEGFB-Hs00173634_m10.047333730.0013479650.07853280.0414205981.17716860.013903745
VEGFC-Hs00153458_m185.88848NV130.90923236.45436NV379.6854
Table 3.

Supplementary. 2-DDCt values corresponding to the Nu407 series.

Gene_Symbol24 h48 h96 h1 week2 week3 week4 week
ADAMTS1-Hs00199608_m10.969533260.431410222.23401280.78768110.408830761.062367
ADAMTS8-Hs00199836_m10.0322049150.20060140.985377430.0103867950.69833110.012592207
AMOT-Hs00611096_m10.210267190.310078861.2626630.335436220.65047360.77168876
ANG;RNASE4-Hs00265741_s12.25076871.731106618.2383564.73301551.1588611.4419116
ANGPT1-Hs00181613_m10.163607570.158799230.433149870.40384821.07883920.241588
ANGPT2-Hs00169867_m1609.73270.127521164.6148005571.93984.092888540.53394
CCL2-Hs00234140_m10.87835020.77053682.76770262.36335951.14061180.93977857
CD36-Hs00169627_m10.262235940.1040323150.39044940.110944160.323808940.2182351
CDH5-Hs00174344_m10.0108937090.176422280.642538370.344520960.264032750.24607353
CHGA-Hs00154441_m1647.80444502.62183500.9494
COL18A1-Hs00181017_m10.939238250.90460152.52156951.11231421.00480011.3427103
CXCL1-Hs00236937_m1112.53738416.713638234.58054139.9429
EDG1-Hs00173499_m170.7205811.46608113.262654
EFNA2-Hs00154858_m116.56256518.947788
EFNA5-Hs00157342_m10.159075770.37885611.28444330.68107550.791652440.9987567
EFNB2-Hs00187950_m10.165249260.110532040.95727040.22825360.581831630.4981927
EGF-Hs00153181_m10.333419650.34792692.30043720.677721560.816177550.26688036
EGFR-Hs00193306_m13.65815110.791796862.72387346.14758540.589375446.7861004
ENG-Hs00164438_m10.134703620.275176230.85376880.50372091.08657170.72379035
EPHB4-Hs00174752_m10.361238360.469234972.61419680.66787071.01674930.82676744
ERBB2;LEMD2-Hs00397754_m10.455294520.430834531.30080440.71285120.680198130.7796248
ETS1-Hs00428287_m10.210700470.217895781.07904890.39436940.75802880.54431254
FGF1-Hs00265254_m13.44990872.831884412.7118184.678271.94977861.498922
FGF2-Hs00266645_m10.30936680.29145671.31039980.424552020.55305410.4609033
FGF7-Hs00384281_m148.6596619.15482538.67718518.28958.4551935979.51294
FGFR1-Hs00241111_m10.33951280.39695451.28060270.483436670.60418560.6130072
FGFR2-Hs00240792_m10.0105844450.098996470.891784130.0045723030.55686050.006664489
FGFR3-Hs00179829_m10.53573390.480008428.0655241.10465120.705784260.27442563
FGFR4-Hs00242558_m10.0091978460.457458763.6043450.092071290.520556450.058838986
FIGF-Hs00189521_m10.60240931.01614191.99587940.402068850.25038040.003528847
FLT1-Hs00176573_m14.5513441.604565110.26030153.1156042.582572265.7581
FLT4-Hs01047679_m135.1039217.77765
FN1-Hs00415006_m10.89667031.01817644.50802333.2121141.11040132.1068652
HGF-Hs00300159_m10.0149228820.553476872.72606020.0196461.16446970.05273539
HIF1A-Hs00153153_m10.126331250.21514661.18211090.11776590.77904580.045135695
HPSE-Hs00180737_m12.02301125.38973332.50396593.51690481.55382733.7573454
ID1-Hs00357821_g11.04722691.82232216.75481652.9729513.81887942.4504051
ID3-Hs00171409_m10.321244980.83180753.881771.95060612.40869142.0135813
IFNA1-Hs00256882_s110.107772.718865213.4053745.9952280.0235570740.1658005
IFNB1-Hs00277188_s1368.304570.72946312.819832416.320680.28179726453.32138
IGF1-Hs00153126_m10.214845880.34623283.40007780.290043680.42579260.52136433
IGF1R-Hs00181385_m12.15154271.03858470.765152451.41027580.694862840.96284115
IL10-Hs00174086_m1227.60149462.6578557.3716
IL12A-Hs00168405_m12.62834640.93487131.92040931.86953750.652696130.5120319
IL8-Hs00174103_m18230.462192.26549423.454388035.38138.5803028473.69
ITGA5-Hs00233743_m10.0070168790.751746362.41653780.005294070.983162640.003165355
ITGAV-Hs00233808_m10.134614780.53502251.49626890.230205281.06022868.66E-05
ITGB3-Hs00173978_m13.2677460.65393825.9470811.56903910.983940240.5260183
MDK-Hs00171064_m13.53E-050.090038610.491262971.14E-050.41430621.38E-05
MMP2-Hs00234422_m10.065016840.062702940.53940680.14536910.365956870.38970318
MMP9-Hs00234579_m1114.9286717.523115
NRP1-Hs00826129_m10.192532850.403648561.46427270.424217080.849690260.59561455
PDGFA-Hs00234994_m10.072741940.174182551.09101530.25978420.559654060.61415255
PDGFB-Hs00234042_m15.4496270.106441396.068553413.4683670.100989155.118809
PDGFRA-Hs00183486_m10.0027687940.140885960.70294780.0025476840.36767122.49E-05
PDGFRB-Hs00182163_m11.87740151.48052684.79436972.27102851.35727751.9019116
PECAM1-Hs00169777_m11.1568940.0529951750.10409891.21255280.434347240.5361058
PGF-Hs00182176_m14.74569132.10582113.5484473.1555350.56604532.1796145
PLAU-Hs00170182_m139.470421.22923116.00181833.1874661.44482164.6638436
PRL-Hs00168730_m10.0402013060.51736131.67396240.152367530.75886210.2555378
PTGS1-Hs00168776_m10.175356090.61623631.93747010.6156020.86356680.5756517
PTGS2-Hs00153133_m124.2011222.817231210.06340832.129763.391162264.61255
PTN-Hs00383235_m10.0570413020.0435892980.0856228550.87624390.0413565230.0223033
SERPINF1-Hs00171467_m10.121819920.086974490.92997860.259720650.332736640.3643281
SMAD1-Hs00195432_m10.239783470.136957630.845509353.36242530.291122056.453879
SPARC-Hs00277762_m10.254837070.553434432.2530730.640479151.20523131.3904755
TGFA-Hs00177401_m140.0049724.5328667.740398410.875058
TGFB1-Hs00171257_m10.65033940.444528852.20727351.04949860.93885090.7896068
TGFB2-Hs00234244_m12.2184520.69280266.9180032.70127321.27034351.6092899
TGFB3-Hs00234245_m10.753935040.290446222.54255530.68220290.431573360.5866003
TGFBR1-Hs00610319_m10.469078660.23057081.39679710.523851630.72932410.43068817
TGFBR2-Hs00234253_m10.64046810.487147632.92099361.11046430.8994452.5526967
TGFBR3-Hs00234257_m10.104522690.370170352.32823750.0812673940.650850360.08022497
THBS1-Hs00170236_m11.55E-040.2592020.85467684.84E-040.305952586.04E-05
THBS2-Hs00170248_m10.83029570.429411771.92311780.63172231.5044751.0725803
THBS3-Hs00200157_m10.12702210.0027834892.0112560.903258261.13493650.8794436
THBS4-Hs00170261_m10.787526970.753117141.3918180.925210540.325371832.5175822
TIE1-Hs00178500_m117.3735917.33117316.97498712.861118
TIMP1-Hs00171558_m11.21044341.03808375.2697964.4453820.986511470.6582526
TIMP2-Hs00234278_m10.299489680.394678682.0310990.61668050.74040240.8702866
TNF-Hs00174128_m10.86174540.91614132.30815080.61620130.373988570.3287523
TNFSF15-Hs00353710_s120.485583.607906618.9422289.1347320.491273370.74366426
VEGF-Hs00173626_m11.568841.76006655.64703561.43512210.105708790.50813204
VEGFB-Hs00173634_m10.263537170.597868561.68404890.310636880.81220450.28514466
VEGFC-Hs00153458_m17599.653317.8203378554.0236385.3613
  43 in total

1.  Tumor cell plasticity in Ewing sarcoma, an alternative circulatory system stimulated by hypoxia.

Authors:  Daisy W J van der Schaft; Femke Hillen; Patrick Pauwels; Dawn A Kirschmann; Karolien Castermans; Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink; Maxine G B Tran; Rafael Sciot; Esther Hauben; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Olivier Delattre; Patrick H Maxwell; Mary J C Hendrix; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Abdominal monophasic synovial sarcoma is a morphological and immunohistochemical mimic of gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

Authors:  Newton A C S Wong; Fiona Campbell; Neil A Shepherd
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity.

Authors:  M P Link; A M Goorin; A W Miser; A A Green; C B Pratt; J B Belasco; J Pritchard; J S Malpas; A R Baker; J A Kirkpatrick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Pro-inflammatory chemokine-chemokine receptor interactions within the Ewing sarcoma microenvironment determine CD8(+) T-lymphocyte infiltration and affect tumour progression.

Authors:  Dagmar Berghuis; Susy J Santos; Hans J Baelde; Antonie Hm Taminiau; R Maarten Egeler; Marco W Schilham; Pancras Cw Hogendoorn; Arjan C Lankester
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Prognostic angiogenic markers (endoglin, VEGF, CD31) and tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Rodrigo Panno Basilio-de-Oliveira; Vera Lucia Nunes Pannain
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Aki Vehtari; Jaakko Riihimäki; Toshirou Nishida; Sonja E Steigen; Peter Brabec; Lukas Plank; Bengt Nilsson; Claudia Cirilli; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Bordoni; Magnus K Magnusson; Zdenek Linke; Jozef Sufliarsky; Massimo Federico; Jon G Jonasson; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Prognostic relevance of increased angiogenesis in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Michael Kreuter; Ralf Bieker; Stefan S Bielack; Tanja Auras; Horst Buerger; Georg Gosheger; Heribert Jurgens; Wolfgang E Berdel; Rolf M Mesters
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Hypoxia induces HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression in chondrosarcoma cells and chondrocytes.

Authors:  Chuzhao Lin; Richard McGough; Bassam Aswad; Joel A Block; Richard Terek
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Jiang Li; Yi-Ling Dai; Wen-Biao Zhang; Shuang-Jiang Li; Chong-Qi Tu
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  A new model of patient tumor-derived breast cancer xenografts for preclinical assays.

Authors:  Elisabetta Marangoni; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Nathalie Auger; Armelle Degeorges; Franck Assayag; Patricia de Cremoux; Ludmilla de Plater; Charlotte Guyader; Gonzague De Pinieux; Jean-Gabriel Judde; Magali Rebucci; Carine Tran-Perennou; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Olivier Delattre; Véronique Diéras; Marie-France Poupon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Angiogenesis in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: From bench to bedside.

Authors:  Stavros P Papadakos; Christos Tsagkaris; Marios Papadakis; Andreas S Papazoglou; Dimitrios V Moysidis; Constantinos G Zografos; Stamatios Theocharis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.