Literature DB >> 17606733

A new model of patient tumor-derived breast cancer xenografts for preclinical assays.

Elisabetta Marangoni1, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Nathalie Auger, Armelle Degeorges, Franck Assayag, Patricia de Cremoux, Ludmilla de Plater, Charlotte Guyader, Gonzague De Pinieux, Jean-Gabriel Judde, Magali Rebucci, Carine Tran-Perennou, Xavier Sastre-Garau, Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani, Olivier Delattre, Véronique Diéras, Marie-France Poupon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish a panel of human breast cancer (HBC) xenografts in immunodeficient mice suitable for pharmacologic preclinical assays. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: 200 samples of HBCs were grafted into Swiss nude mice. Twenty-five transplantable xenografts were established (12.5%). Their characterization included histology, p53 status, genetic analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization, gene expression by Western blotting, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Biological profiles of nine xenografts were compared with those of the corresponding patient's tumor. Chemosensitivities of 17 xenografts to a combination of Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel, trastuzumab, and Degarelix were evaluated.
RESULTS: Almost all patient tumors established as xenografts displayed an aggressive phenotype, i.e., high-grade, triple-negative status. The histology of the xenografts recapitulated the features of the original tumors. Mutation of p53 and inactivation of Rb and PTEN proteins were found in 83%, 30%, and 42% of HBC xenografts, respectively. Two HBCx had an ERBB2 (HER2) amplification. Large variations were observed in the expression of HER family receptors and in genomic profiles. Genomic alterations were close to those of original samples in paired tumors. Three xenografts formed lung metastases. A total of 15 of the 17 HBCx (88%) responded to AC, and 8 (47%) responded to docetaxel. One ERBB2-amplified xenograft responded to trastuzumab, whereas the other did not. The drug response of HBC xenografts was concordant with that of the patient's tumor in five of seven analyzable cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This panel of breast cancer xenografts includes 15 triple-negative, one ER positive and 2 ERBB2 positive. This panel represents a useful preclinical tool for testing new agents and protocols and for further exploration of the biological basis of drug responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606733     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  187 in total

1.  Biopathological Significance of TLR9 Expression in Cancer Cells and Tumor Microenvironment Across Invasive Breast Carcinomas Subtypes.

Authors:  Didier Meseure; Sophie Vacher; Kinan Drak Alsibai; Martine Trassard; André Nicolas; Renaud Leclere; Florence Lerebours; Jean Marc Guinebretiere; Elisabetta Marangoni; Rosette Lidereau; Ivan Bieche
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2016-07-09

2.  Generation of a Liver Orthotopic Human Uveal Melanoma Xenograft Platform in Immunodeficient Mice.

Authors:  Ken Kageyama; Shinji Ozaki; Takami Sato
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Image-guided photo-therapeutic nanoporphyrin synergized HSP90 inhibitor in patient-derived xenograft bladder cancer model.

Authors:  Qilai Long; Tzu-Yin Lin; Yee Huang; Xiaocen Li; Ai-Hong Ma; Hongyong Zhang; Randy Carney; Susan Airhart; Kit S Lam; Ralph W deVere White; Chong-Xian Pan; Yuanpei Li
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Metastasis Research Society-American Association For Cancer Research Joint Conference on Metastasis.

Authors:  Danny R Welch; Carlton R Cooper; Douglas R Hurst; Conor C Lynch; Michelle D Martin; Kedar S Vaidya; Michael N VanSaun; Andrea M Mastro
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Mi Young Kim
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Breast Cancer Research.

Authors:  Deukchae Na; Hyeong-Gon Moon
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  Examining the utility of patient-derived xenograft mouse models.

Authors:  Samuel Aparicio; Manuel Hidalgo; Andrew L Kung
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Multivalent nanobodies targeting death receptor 5 elicit superior tumor cell killing through efficient caspase induction.

Authors:  Heather A Huet; Joseph D Growney; Jennifer A Johnson; Jing Li; Sanela Bilic; Lance Ostrom; Mohammad Zafari; Colleen Kowal; Guizhi Yang; Axelle Royo; Michael Jensen; Bruno Dombrecht; Kris R A Meerschaert; Joost A Kolkman; Karen D Cromie; Rebecca Mosher; Hui Gao; Alwin Schuller; Randi Isaacs; William R Sellers; Seth A Ettenberg
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  Chromatin Regulators as a Guide for Cancer Treatment Choice.

Authors:  Zachary A Gurard-Levin; Laurence O W Wilson; Vera Pancaldi; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Fabricio G Sousa; Cecile Reyes; Elisabetta Marangoni; David Gentien; Alfonso Valencia; Yves Pommier; Paul Cottu; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 6.261

10.  Immunodeficient mouse strains display marked variability in growth of human melanoma lung metastases.

Authors:  Beatriz M Carreno; Joel R Garbow; Grant R Kolar; Erin N Jackson; John A Engelbach; Michelle Becker-Hapak; Leonidas N Carayannopoulos; David Piwnica-Worms; Gerald P Linette
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.