PURPOSE: To establish a panel of human breast cancer (HBC) xenografts in immunodeficient mice suitable for pharmacologic preclinical assays. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 200 samples of HBCs were grafted into Swiss nude mice. Twenty-five transplantable xenografts were established (12.5%). Their characterization included histology, p53 status, genetic analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization, gene expression by Western blotting, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Biological profiles of nine xenografts were compared with those of the corresponding patient's tumor. Chemosensitivities of 17 xenografts to a combination of Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel, trastuzumab, and Degarelix were evaluated. RESULTS: Almost all patient tumors established as xenografts displayed an aggressive phenotype, i.e., high-grade, triple-negative status. The histology of the xenografts recapitulated the features of the original tumors. Mutation of p53 and inactivation of Rb and PTEN proteins were found in 83%, 30%, and 42% of HBC xenografts, respectively. Two HBCx had an ERBB2 (HER2) amplification. Large variations were observed in the expression of HER family receptors and in genomic profiles. Genomic alterations were close to those of original samples in paired tumors. Three xenografts formed lung metastases. A total of 15 of the 17 HBCx (88%) responded to AC, and 8 (47%) responded to docetaxel. One ERBB2-amplified xenograft responded to trastuzumab, whereas the other did not. The drug response of HBC xenografts was concordant with that of the patient's tumor in five of seven analyzable cases. CONCLUSIONS: This panel of breast cancer xenografts includes 15 triple-negative, one ER positive and 2 ERBB2 positive. This panel represents a useful preclinical tool for testing new agents and protocols and for further exploration of the biological basis of drug responses.
PURPOSE: To establish a panel of humanbreast cancer (HBC) xenografts in immunodeficientmice suitable for pharmacologic preclinical assays. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 200 samples of HBCs were grafted into Swiss nude mice. Twenty-five transplantable xenografts were established (12.5%). Their characterization included histology, p53 status, genetic analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization, gene expression by Western blotting, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Biological profiles of nine xenografts were compared with those of the corresponding patient's tumor. Chemosensitivities of 17 xenografts to a combination of Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel, trastuzumab, and Degarelix were evaluated. RESULTS: Almost all patienttumors established as xenografts displayed an aggressive phenotype, i.e., high-grade, triple-negative status. The histology of the xenografts recapitulated the features of the original tumors. Mutation of p53 and inactivation of Rb and PTEN proteins were found in 83%, 30%, and 42% of HBC xenografts, respectively. Two HBCx had an ERBB2 (HER2) amplification. Large variations were observed in the expression of HER family receptors and in genomic profiles. Genomic alterations were close to those of original samples in paired tumors. Three xenografts formed lung metastases. A total of 15 of the 17 HBCx (88%) responded to AC, and 8 (47%) responded to docetaxel. One ERBB2-amplified xenograft responded to trastuzumab, whereas the other did not. The drug response of HBC xenografts was concordant with that of the patient's tumor in five of seven analyzable cases. CONCLUSIONS: This panel of breast cancer xenografts includes 15 triple-negative, one ER positive and 2 ERBB2 positive. This panel represents a useful preclinical tool for testing new agents and protocols and for further exploration of the biological basis of drug responses.
Authors: Didier Meseure; Sophie Vacher; Kinan Drak Alsibai; Martine Trassard; André Nicolas; Renaud Leclere; Florence Lerebours; Jean Marc Guinebretiere; Elisabetta Marangoni; Rosette Lidereau; Ivan Bieche Journal: Cancer Microenviron Date: 2016-07-09
Authors: Danny R Welch; Carlton R Cooper; Douglas R Hurst; Conor C Lynch; Michelle D Martin; Kedar S Vaidya; Michael N VanSaun; Andrea M Mastro Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Heather A Huet; Joseph D Growney; Jennifer A Johnson; Jing Li; Sanela Bilic; Lance Ostrom; Mohammad Zafari; Colleen Kowal; Guizhi Yang; Axelle Royo; Michael Jensen; Bruno Dombrecht; Kris R A Meerschaert; Joost A Kolkman; Karen D Cromie; Rebecca Mosher; Hui Gao; Alwin Schuller; Randi Isaacs; William R Sellers; Seth A Ettenberg Journal: MAbs Date: 2014 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Zachary A Gurard-Levin; Laurence O W Wilson; Vera Pancaldi; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Fabricio G Sousa; Cecile Reyes; Elisabetta Marangoni; David Gentien; Alfonso Valencia; Yves Pommier; Paul Cottu; Geneviève Almouzni Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Beatriz M Carreno; Joel R Garbow; Grant R Kolar; Erin N Jackson; John A Engelbach; Michelle Becker-Hapak; Leonidas N Carayannopoulos; David Piwnica-Worms; Gerald P Linette Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531