| Literature DB >> 28386288 |
Valter R M Lombardi1, Iván Carrera1, Ramón Cacabelos1.
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that a variety of chemopreventive plant components affect tumor initiation, promotion, and progression and the main difference, between botanical medicines and synthetic drugs, resides in the presence of complex metabolite mixtures shown by botanical medicine which in turn exert their action on different levels and via different mechanisms. In the present study, we performed an in vitro screening of ethanol extracts from commercial plants in order to investigate potential antitumor activity against human tumor cell lines. Experimental results obtained through a variety of methods and techniques indicated that extracts of I. verum, G. glabra, R. Frangula, and L. usitatissimum present significant reduction in in vitro tumor cell proliferation, suggesting these extracts as possible chemotherapeutical adjuvants for different cancer treatments.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28386288 PMCID: PMC5366791 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2675631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Effects of Illicium verum and Linum usitatissimum seed extracts, Glycyrrhiza glabra root extracts, and Rhamnus Frangula leave extracts on the growth of different tumor cell lines.
Growth inhibition percentages recorded at screening concentration of 50 μg/mL.
| SW872 | SW982 | HS 39.T | HS 5.T | HL-60 | M14WM | MCF-7 | HT29 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 |
|
| 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
|
| 8 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
|
| 10 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
|
| 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 9 |
|
| 9 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 6 |
|
| 8 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 10 | 8 |
|
| 5 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 5 |
|
| 7 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
|
| 8 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 9 |
|
| 10 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
|
| 11 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
|
| 15 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 5 |
| | 10 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 6 |
|
| 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
|
| 9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 11 | 10 |
|
| 8 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 13 | 11 |
|
| 8 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|
| 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
|
| 7 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 10 |
|
| 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
|
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
|
| 9 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 15 |
|
| 4 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 11 |
|
| 8 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
Values are the mean of at least three independent determinations; coefficient of variation was less than 15%; not significant (below 15% inhibition).
Growth inhibition percentages recorded at screening concentration of 25 μg/mL.
| SW872 | SW982 | HS 39.T | HS 5.T | HL-60 | M14WM | MCF-7 | HT29 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 65 ± 9 | 70 ± 15 | 70 ± 14 | 65 ± 13 | 60 ± 12 | 66 ± 13 | 61 ± 19 | 58 ± 16 |
|
| 70 ± 22 | 75 ± 14 | 70 ± 18 | 68 ± 13 | 65 ± 15 | 65 ± 21 | 55 ± 16 | 58 ± 18 |
|
| 65 ± 13 | 71 ± 23 | 72 ± 12 | 60 ± 16 | 61 ± 15 | 66 ± 16 | 60 ± 17 | 60 ± 18 |
|
| 20 ± 6 | 58 ± 18 | 65 ± 10 | 66 ± 17 | 60 ± 14 | 55 ± 19 | 58 ± 16 | 65 ± 13 |
Values are the mean of at least three independent determinations; coefficient of variation was less than 15%; not significant (below 15% inhibition).
Growth inhibition percentages recorded at screening concentration of 10 μg/mL.
| SW872 | SW982 | HS 39.T | HS 5.T | HL-60 | M14WM | MCF-7 | HT29 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13 ± 8 | 14 ± 3 | 12 ± 4 | 11 ± 4 | 14 ± 9 | 28 ± 11 | 31 ± 11 | 25 ± 8 |
|
| 11 ± 8 | 11 ± 7 | 21 ± 8 | 13 ± 7 | 12 ± 5 | 27 ± 9 | 11 ± 4 | 28 ± 4 |
|
| 11 ± 6 | 14 ± 3 | 26 ± 9 | 11 ± 6 | 32 ± 12 | 25 ± 5 | 12 ± 4 | 12 ± 8 |
|
| 19 ± 6 | 25 ± 11 | 25 ± 6 | 31 ± 7 | 26 ± 7 | 28 ± 8 | 26 ± 4 | 23 ± 7 |
Values are the mean of at least three independent determinations; coefficient of variation was less than 15%; not significant (below 15% inhibition).
Figure 2Phase contrast micrograph fields of untreated and treated cell lines used in the study. Black arrows show clear signs of apoptotic morphology (condensed/fragmented nuclei).
Induction of apoptosis by 10, 25, and 50 μg/mL of Illicium verum, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Rhamnus Frangula, and Linum usitatissimum alcoholic extracts in SW872, SW982, HS 39.T, HS 5.T, HL-60, M14WM, MCF-7, and HT29 cell lines measured by ELISA.
| SW872 | SW982 | HS 39.T | HS 5.T | HL-60 | M14WM | MCF-7 | HT29 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 45 ± 4 | 55 ± 11 | 54 ± 11 | 26 ± 5 | 33 ± 8 | 32 ± 10 | 17 ± 10 | 22 ± 7 |
|
| 66 ± 5 | 57 ± 10 | 45 ± 13 | 33 ± 9 | 36 ± 6 | 34 ± 12 | 26 ± 18 | 28 ± 9 |
|
| 70 ± 5 | 67 ± 12 | 58 ± 14 | 45 ± 9 | 44 ± 8 | 45 ± 16 | 38 ± 13 | 25 ± 10 |
|
| 55 ± 11 | 44 ± 9 | 55 ± 10 | 26 ± 11 | 46 ± 10 | 43 ± 8 | 44 ± 9 | 28 ± 7 |
|
| 67 ± 12 | 45 ± 7 | 58 ± 11 | 32 ± 12 | 47 ± 11 | 44 ± 11 | 57 ± 9 | 28 ± 9 |
|
| 65 ± 11 | 66 ± 11 | 77 ± 12 | 35 ± 11 | 44 ± 9 | 44 ± 15 | 88 ± 23 | 33 ± 9 |
|
| 66 ± 9 | 77 ± 11 | 65 ± 14 | 75 ± 12 | 65 ± 12 | 88 ± 9 | 78 ± 9 | 74 ± 11 |
|
| 70 ± 11 | 74 ± 12 | 64 ± 11 | 78 ± 21 | 68 ± 15 | 62 ± 12 | 68 ± 11 | 75 ± 21 |
|
| 78 ± 9 | 88 ± 11 | 79 ± 13 | 89 ± 22 | 98 ± 17 | 96 ± 10 | 95 ± 12 | 86 ± 24 |
|
| 43 ± 10 | 54 ± 10 | 34 ± 12 | 34 ± 11 | 32 ± 11 | 19 ± 6 | 44 ± 13 | 18 ± 6 |
|
| 56 ± 12 | 77 ± 14 | 44 ± 16 | 45 ± 9 | 46 ± 10 | 25 ± 11 | 58 ± 14 | 34 ± 9 |
|
| 50 ± 14 | 86 ± 18 | 54 ± 18 | 55 ± 9 | 66 ± 13 | 28 ± 11 | 98 ± 28 | 66 ± 16 |
The data represent mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments; coefficient of variation was less than 15%; data are expressed as the mean percentage of apoptotic cells.
Figure 3mRNA expression profile of Bax, p53, Bcl-2, and Bcl-XL in HL-60, MCF-7, and HT29 cell lines. A total of 1 × 106 cells were treated with 10 μg/mL of alcoholic extracts for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated and treated with DNase; 1 μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with a synthesis kit, using oligo-dT and a random hexamer. mRNA levels were compared by RT-qPCR. Results were normalized to the β-globin gene and expressed as the mean ± SD relative to the negative control (C−, untreated cells). As positive control (C+) cells were treated with 7 μM of staurosporine. Experiments were done in triplicate. p < 0.05 versus C−; p < 0.001 versus C−.