| Literature DB >> 28385108 |
Hanene Zemmouri1,2, Omar Sekiou1, Sonda Ammar3, Abdelfattah El Feki4, Mohamed Bouaziz3, Mahfoud Messarah1, Amel Boumendjel1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: To find bioactive medicinal herbs exerting anti-asthmatic activity, we investigated the effect of an aqueous extract of Urtica dioica L. (Urticaceae) leaves (UD), the closest extract to the Algerian traditional use.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-asthmatic; airway inflammation; nettle; oxidative stress; polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28385108 PMCID: PMC6130499 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1310905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Polyphenols, flavonoids, flavanols, tannins and anthocyanins content and scavenging capacity of U. dioica extract.
| Total antioxidant activity | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples | DPPH IC50 (μg/mL) | NBT IC50 (μg/mL) | BHT (mg BHT/mg extract) | Vit C (mg vit C/mg extract) | Total polyphenols (mg GA/g DE) | Flavonoids (mg Q/g DE) | Flavanols (mg R/g DE) | Tannins (mg C/g DE) | Anthocyanins (mgC-3G/gDE) |
| UD extract | 152.34 ± 0.37 | 353.15 ± 0.70 | 0.876 ± 0.03 | 0.582 ± 0.04 | 30.79 ± 0.96 | 22.58 ± 1.02 | 6.30 ± 1.59 | 1.05 ± 0.34 | 0.17 ± 0.03 |
| BHT | 22.5 ± 0.62 | 189.27 ± 6.23 | __ | __ | __ | __ | __ | __ | __ |
| Vit C | 3.14 ± 0.36 | 167.47 ± 1.40 | __ | __ | __ | __ | __ | __ | __ |
Values are mean ± SE of three replicates for each estimation.
Body weights of rats and relative weights of lungs and liver.
| CTL | OVA | UD | O/UD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW of rats | 164.17 ± 2.77 | 165.57 ± 2.62 | 164.29 ± 1.86 | 164.71 ± 3.62 |
| Final BW of rats | 281.66 ± 4.41 | 284.28 ± 4.12 | 287 ± 4.69 | 285 ± 6.24 |
| Weight gain | +117.49 | +108.71 | +122.71 | +120.29 |
| BW of rats compared to T (%) | – | −2.82 | 2.04 | 1.27 |
| BW of rats compared to OVA (%) | – | – | – | 4.21 |
| RW of lungs (g) | 0.74 ± 0.13 | 0.91 ± 0.13 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.78 ± 0.04 |
| RW of lungs compared to T (%) | – | 22.97 | 2.70 | 5.40 |
| RW of lungs compared to OVA (%) | – | – | – | −14.28 |
| RW of liver (g) | 3.38 ± 0.13 | 3.91 ± 0.17 | 3.44 ± 0.24 | 3.83 ± 0.27 |
| RW of liver compared to T (%) | – | 15.68 | 1.77 | 13.01 |
| RW of liver compared to OVA (%) | – | – | – | −2.30 |
BW: body weights; RW: relative weight.
Figure 1.Effect of UD extract on inflammatory cells in serum and BALF. **: p values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant compared to control rats; #: p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant compared to OA sensitized rats; ##: p values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant compared to OA sensitized rats.
Figure 2.Effect of UD extract on the recruitment of leucocytes in lung tissue. Histological examination of lung tissue was performed 48 h after the final OVA challenge. (Magnification 10× et 100×).
Figure 3.Effect of UD extract on Il-4 concentration in serum and BALF.
Figure 4.Effect of UD extract on markers of oxidative stress in liver, lungs and erythrocyte. *: p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant compared to control rats ; #: p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant compared to OA sensitized rats.
Correlations between markers of airway inflammation and markers of oxidative stress.
| Markers of oxidative stress | Correlation coefficient Pearson ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markers of airway inflammation | MDA | GSH | GPx | SOD | CAT |
| Blood | |||||
| Leucocytes | 0.77 | −0.94* | −0.82 | −0.95* | −0.68 |
| Lymphocytes | 0.83 | −0.91 | −0.88 | −0.97** | −0.76 |
| IL-4 | 0.86 | −0.86 | −0.92 | −0.96* | −0.77 |
| BALF | |||||
| Eosinophils | 0.61 | −0.93 | −0.70 | −0.86 | −0.50 |
| Lymphocytes | 0.77 | −0.97* | −0.79 | −0.97* | −0.71 |
| IL-4 | 0.47 | −0.95* | −0.56 | −0.80 | −0.38 |
*p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant compared to control rats.
**p values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant compared to control rats.