Literature DB >> 28384890

Effectiveness of Video Demonstration over Conventional Methods in Teaching Osteology in Anatomy.

Angela A Viswasom1, Abraham Jobby2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Technology and its applications are the most happening things in the world. So, is it in the field of medical education. This study was an evaluation of whether the conventional methods can compete with the test of technology. AIM: A comparative study of traditional method of teaching osteology in human anatomy with an innovative visual aided method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 94 students admitted to MBBS 2014 to 2015 batch of Travancore Medical College. The students were divided into two academically validated groups. They were taught using conventional and video demonstrational techniques in a systematic manner. Post evaluation tests were conducted.
RESULTS: Analysis of the mark pattern revealed that the group taught using traditional method scored better when compared to the visual aided method. Feedback analysis showed that, the students were able to identify bony features better with clear visualisation and three dimensional view when taught using the video demonstration method. The students identified visual aided method as the more interesting one for learning which helped them in applying the knowledge gained. In most of the questions asked, the two methods of teaching were found to be comparable on the same scale.
CONCLUSION: As the study ends, we discover that, no new technique can be substituted for time tested techniques of teaching and learning. The ideal method would be incorporating newer multimedia techniques into traditional classes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning objectives; Multimedia tools; Video assisted learning

Year:  2017        PMID: 28384890      PMCID: PMC5376855          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24029.9429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  4 in total

1.  Video vs. CD-ROM for teaching pelvic anatomy to third-year medical students. A comparison.

Authors:  C J Sultana; J Levy; R Rogers
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 2.  Anatomical informatics: Millennial perspectives on a newer frontier.

Authors:  Robert B Trelease
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2002-10-15

3.  Assessment outcomes: computerized instruction in a human gross anatomy course.

Authors:  Elaine L Bukowski
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2002

4.  Traditional teaching supported by computer-assisted learning for macroscopic anatomy.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña; Jesús Alberto Morales-Gómez; Santos López Guzmán; Iván León Hernández; Ricardo Patiño Ibarra; Félix Cavazos Vilchez
Journal:  Anat Rec B New Anat       Date:  2004-05
  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  A survey study on distance anatomy education: challenges unique to anatomy.

Authors:  Abdullah Ortadeveci; Merve Nur Ermez; Semih Oz; Hilmi Ozden
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?

Authors:  Charlotte P R Triepels; Carlijn F A Smeets; Kim J B Notten; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Jurgen J Futterer; Tineke F M Vergeldt; Sander M J Van Kuijk
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Practice and exploration of the "student-centered" multielement fusion teaching mode in human anatomy.

Authors:  Xiumei Fu; Xueyan Wu; Donghui Liu; Chengyun Zhang; Honglin Xie; Ying Wang; Lijun Xiao
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  "Dissection Educational Videos" (DEVs) and their contribution in anatomy education: a students' perspective.

Authors:  Konstantinos Natsis; Nikolaos Lazaridis; Michael Kostares; Nikolaos Anastasopoulos; Dimitrios Chytas; Trifon Totlis; Maria Piagkou
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation.

Authors:  Joe Iwanaga; Marios Loukas; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.409

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.