| Literature DB >> 28382978 |
Zhangyu Guo1, Yanxing Chen1, Yan-Fang Mao1, Tingting Zheng1, Yasi Jiang1, Yaping Yan1, Xinzhen Yin1, Baorong Zhang1.
Abstract
Recent evidence reveals that aberrant brain insulin signaling plays an important role in the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Intranasal insulin administration has been reported to improve memory and attention in healthy participants and in AD patients. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we treated intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-injected (ICV-STZ) rats, a commonly used animal model of sporadic AD, with daily intranasal delivery of insulin (2 U/day) for 6 consecutive weeks and then studied their cognitive function with the Morris water maze test and biochemical changes via Western blotting. We observed cognitive deficits, tau hyperphosphorylation, and neuroinflammation in the brains of ICV-STZ rats. Intranasal insulin treatment for 6 weeks significantly improved cognitive function, attenuated the level of tau hyperphosphorylation, ameliorated microglial activation, and enhanced neurogenesis in ICV-STZ rats. Additionally, our results indicate that intranasal delivery of insulin probably attenuates tau hyperphosphorylation through the down-regulation of ERK1/2 and CaMKII in the brains of ICV-STZ rats. Our findings demonstrate a beneficial effect of intranasal insulin and provide the mechanistic basis for treating AD patients with intranasal insulin.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28382978 PMCID: PMC5382700 DOI: 10.1038/srep45971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effect of intranasal insulin on open field and Morris water maze performance.
(a) Experiment schedule. (b) The level of blood glucose of the three groups during the treatment. (c) Spontaneous locomotor and exploratory activity was tested in an open field arena and the total distance travelled in the open field was recorded. (d–g) Spatial learning and memory were assessed with the Morris water maze. In 3-day acquisition trials, the rats’ escape latencies (d) and the average swim speed (g) were measured. In the probe trial, the time in the target quadrant in 60 s (e) and the number of platform site crossings (f) were recorded. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 13–15 per group). *P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the STZ/Sal group.
Figure 2Effect of intranasal insulin on the phosphorylation of tau.
(a) Hippocampal extracts were measured via Western blots. (b) Densitometric quantification of the blots after normalization to the total tau (Tau-5) level. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 9–11 per group). *P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the STZ/Sal group.
Figure 3Effect of intranasal insulin on tau kinases and phosphatases.
Hippocampal homogenates were detected via Western blots (a,c) and quantitative analysis was normalized to the GAPDH level (b,e) and the corresponding total protein kinase level (c,f). Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 9–11 per group). *P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the STZ/Sal group.
Figure 4Effect of intranasal insulin on neuroinflammation markers.
(a) The GFAP and Iba1 levels in whole hippocampus extracts were measured via Western blots. (b) Densitometric quantification of the blots after normalization to the GAPDH level. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 9–11 per group). *P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the STZ/Sal group. (c) Representative immunohistochemical staining of brain sections with an antibody against Iba1, n = 4 per group. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5Effect of intranasal insulin on the levels of doublecortin and synaptic proteins.
Hippocampus extracts were measured via Western blots (a,c) and quantitative analysis was normalized to the GAPDH level (b,d). Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 9–11 per group). *P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the STZ/Sal group.
Figure 6Effect of intranasal insulin on the brain insulin signaling pathway.
(a) Hippocampal homogenates were detected via Western blots. (b) Quantitative analysis was normalized to the GAPDH level. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 9–11 per group). *P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the STZ/Sal group.
Primary antibodies used in this study.
| Antibody | Phosphorylation sites | Source |
|---|---|---|
| pS199/202 | Ser199/202 | Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY |
| pT205 | Thr205 | Invitrogen |
| pS262 | Ser262 | Invitrogen |
| pS396 | Ser396 | Invitrogen |
| Tau-5 | Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA | |
| GSK-3α/β | Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA | |
| GSK-3α/β pS21/9 | Ser21/9 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| CDK5 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA | |
| P35 | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| ERK1/2 | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| ERK1/2(pT202/pY204) | Thr202/Tyr204 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| JNK | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| JNK(pT183/pY185) | Thr183/Tyr185 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| CaMKII | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | |
| CaMKII (pT286) | Thr286 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology |
| Methyl-PP2A-C | Millipore | |
| PP2A(pY307) | Tyr307 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology |
| PP2A-C | Millipore | |
| GFAP | Millipore | |
| Iba1 | Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA | |
| Doublecortin | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | |
| Synapsin 1 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | |
| Synaptophysin | Millipore | |
| PSD95 | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| IRβ | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| p-IRβ/IGF-1Rβ | Tyr1150/1151(IRβ), Tyr1135/1136 (IGF-1Rβ) | Cell Signaling Technology |
| IRS1 | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| IRS1 pS636 | Ser636 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA |
| PI3K p85 | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| p-PI3K p85 | Tyr458 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| PDK1 | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| PDK1 pS241 | Ser241 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| AKT | Cell Signaling Technology | |
| AKT pT308 | Thr308 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| AKT pS473 | Ser473 | Cell Signaling Technology |
| GAPDH | Santa Cruz Biotechnology |