Literature DB >> 28382778

2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Minimal, Moderate, and Major Clinical Response in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Collaborative Initiative.

Lisa G Rider1, Rohit Aggarwal2, Angela Pistorio3, Nastaran Bayat1, Brian Erman4, Brian M Feldman5, Adam M Huber6, Rolando Cimaz7, Rubén J Cuttica8, Sheila Knupp de Oliveira9, Carol B Lindsley10, Clarissa A Pilkington11, Marilynn Punaro12, Angelo Ravelli13, Ann M Reed14, Kelly Rouster-Stevens15, Annet van Royen-Kerkhof16, Frank Dressler17, Claudia Saad Magalhaes18, Tamás Constantin19, Joyce E Davidson20, Bo Magnusson21, Ricardo Russo22, Luca Villa23, Mariangela Rinaldi23, Howard Rockette2, Peter A Lachenbruch1, Frederick W Miller1, Jiri Vencovsky24, Nicolino Ruperto23.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop response criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (DM).
METHODS: We analyzed the performance of 312 definitions that used core set measures from either the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) or the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and were derived from natural history data and a conjoint analysis survey. They were further validated using data from the PRINTO trial of prednisone alone compared to prednisone with methotrexate or cyclosporine and the Rituximab in Myositis (RIM) trial. At a consensus conference, experts considered 14 top candidate criteria based on their performance characteristics and clinical face validity, using nominal group technique.
RESULTS: Consensus was reached for a conjoint analysis-based continuous model with a total improvement score of 0-100, using absolute percent change in core set measures of minimal (≥30), moderate (≥45), and major (≥70) improvement. The same criteria were chosen for adult DM/polymyositis, with differing thresholds for improvement. The sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 91-98% for minimal improvement, 92-94% and 94-99% for moderate improvement, and 91-98% and 85-86% for major improvement, respectively, in juvenile DM patient cohorts using the IMACS and PRINTO core set measures. These criteria were validated in the PRINTO trial for differentiating between treatment arms for minimal and moderate improvement (P = 0.009-0.057) and in the RIM trial for significantly differentiating the physician's rating for improvement (P < 0.006).
CONCLUSION: The response criteria for juvenile DM consisted of a conjoint analysis-based model using a continuous improvement score based on absolute percent change in core set measures, with thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement.
© 2017, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28382778      PMCID: PMC5577002          DOI: 10.1002/art.40060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  29 in total

1.  Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 3.  Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology.

Authors:  Nicolino Ruperto; Silvia Meiorin; Silvia Mirela Iusan; Angelo Ravelli; Angela Pistorio; Alberto Martini
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  A proposed revision to the ACR20: the hybrid measure of American College of Rheumatology response.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-03-15

Review 5.  Proposed preliminary core set measures for disease outcome assessment in adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  F W Miller; L G Rider; Y L Chung; R Cooper; K Danko; V Farewell; I Lundberg; C Morrison; L Oakley; I Oakley; C Pilkington; J Vencovsky; K Vincent; D L Scott; D A Isenberg
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 6.  Defining Clinical Improvement in Adult and Juvenile Myositis.

Authors:  Lisa G Rider; Edward H Giannini; Michael Harris-Love; Galen Joe; David Isenberg; Clarissa Pilkington; Peter A Lachenbruch; Frederick W Miller
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Rationale and strategies for reevaluating the ACR20.

Authors:  David T Felson; Daniel E Furst; Maarten Boers
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 8.  Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Nicolino Ruperto; Angelo Ravelli; Kevin J Murray; Daniel J Lovell; Boel Andersson-Gare; Brian M Feldman; Stella Garay; Wietse Kuis; Claudia Machado; Lauren Pachman; Anne-Marie Prieur; Lisa G Rider; Earl Silverman; Elena Tsitsami; Pat Woo; Edward H Giannini; Alberto Martini
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 9.  International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis.

Authors:  Lisa G Rider; Edward H Giannini; Hermine I Brunner; Nicola Ruperto; Laura James-Newton; Ann M Reed; Peter A Lachenbruch; Frederick W Miller
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-07

10.  The provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Disease activity core set for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  Nicolino Ruperto; Angelo Ravelli; Angela Pistorio; Virginia Ferriani; Immaculada Calvo; Gerd Ganser; Jurgen Brunner; Guenther Dannecker; Clovis Arthur Silva; Valda Stanevicha; Rebecca Ten Cate; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Olga Voygioyka; Michel Fischbach; Ivan Foeldvari; Odete Hilario; Consuelo Modesto; Rotraud K Saurenmann; Marie-Josephe Sauvain; Iloite Scheibel; Danièle Sommelet; Lana Tambic-Bukovac; Roberto Barcellona; Riva Brik; Stephan Ehl; Mirjana Jovanovic; Jozef Rovensky; Francesca Bagnasco; Daniel J Lovell; Alberto Martini
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-01-15
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Update on outcome assessment in myositis.

Authors:  Lisa G Rider; Rohit Aggarwal; Pedro M Machado; Jean-Yves Hogrel; Ann M Reed; Lisa Christopher-Stine; Nicolino Ruperto
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Inflammatory myopathies: Adult and paediatric experts unite for new response criteria.

Authors:  Joanna Collison
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Advances in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Myositis Specific Antibodies Aid in Understanding Disease Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Lauren M Pachman; Amer M Khojah
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Treatment of anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive juvenile dermatomyositis using tofacitinib.

Authors:  Sara Sabbagh; Adriana Almeida de Jesus; SuJin Hwang; Hye Sun Kuehn; Hanna Kim; Lawrence Jung; Ruy Carrasco; Sergio Rosenzweig; Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky; Lisa G Rider
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  [Juvenile dermatomyositis-what's new?]

Authors:  C Hinze
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Advances Toward Precision Medicine in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Jessica Neely; Susan Kim
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Collaborative Initiative.

Authors:  Rohit Aggarwal; Lisa G Rider; Nicolino Ruperto; Nastaran Bayat; Brian Erman; Brian M Feldman; Chester V Oddis; Anthony A Amato; Hector Chinoy; Robert G Cooper; Maryam Dastmalchi; David Fiorentino; David Isenberg; James D Katz; Andrew Mammen; Marianne de Visser; Steven R Ytterberg; Ingrid E Lundberg; Lorinda Chung; Katalin Danko; Ignacio García-De la Torre; Yeong Wook Song; Luca Villa; Mariangela Rinaldi; Howard Rockette; Peter A Lachenbruch; Frederick W Miller; Jiri Vencovsky
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Testing Versus Fixed Short Forms in Juvenile Myositis.

Authors:  Ruchi N Patel; Valeria G Esparza; Jin-Shei Lai; Elizabeth L Gray; Bryce B Reeve; Rowland W Chang; David Cella; Kaveh Ardalan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.178

Review 9.  New Myositis Classification Criteria-What We Have Learned Since Bohan and Peter.

Authors:  Valérie Leclair; Ingrid E Lundberg
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 10.  Current Classification and Management of Inflammatory Myopathies.

Authors:  Jens Schmidt
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.