| Literature DB >> 28382265 |
Hong Rae Kim1, Sung-Ho Jung1, Jung Jun Park1, Tae Jin Yun1, Suk Jung Choo1, Cheol Hyun Chung1, Jae Won Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Closure of a secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is possible through surgical intervention or device placement. During surgical intervention, concomitant pathologies are corrected. The present study was conducted to investigate the outcomes of surgical ASD closure, to determine the risk factors of mortality, and establish the effects of concomitant disease correction.Entities:
Keywords: Heart septal defects, atrial; Survival; Tricuspid valve insufficiency
Year: 2017 PMID: 28382265 PMCID: PMC5380199 DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.2.78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 2233-601X
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| No. of patients | 693 |
| Age (yr) | 40.9±13.1 |
| Male gender | 199 (28.7) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 21 (3.0) |
| Hypertension | 73 (10.5) |
| History of cerebrovascular accident | 1 (0.1) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 39 (5.6) |
| Chronic renal failure | 2 (0.3) |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1 (0.1) |
| Echocardiographic data | |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 62.9±6.40 |
| Size of atrial septal defect (mm) | 24.3±7.80 |
| Peak TR pressure gradient (mm Hg) | 38.8±16.2 |
| TR | |
| None-to-trace | 26 (3.8) |
| Grade I | 366 (52.8) |
| Grade II | 164 (23.7) |
| Grade III | 85 (12.3) |
| Grade IV | 52 (7.5) |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 162 (23.4) |
| Approach | |
| Sternotomy | 439 (63.3) |
| Thoracotomy | 254 (36.7) |
| AESOP | 50 (7.2) |
| Da Vinci | 23 (3.3) |
| Tricuspid annuloplasty technique | 159 (22.9) |
| Ring annuloplasty | 27 |
| Carpentier-Edwards | 13 |
| Duran | 14 |
| De Vega | 108 |
| Kay | 24 |
| Maze procedure | 35 (5.1) |
| Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min) | 71.0±28.2 |
| Aortic cross clamp time (min) | 33.0±17.0 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). The following instrument was used: AESOP (Automated Endoscope System for Optimal Positioning Computer Motion Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA), Da Vinci (Da Vinci Surgical System Intuitive Inc., Sunnydale, CA, USA).
TR, tricuspid regurgitation.
Baseline characteristics of patients with significant TR
| Characteristic | TR grade ≤2 | TR grade >2 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 556 | 137 | |
| Age (yr) | 39.5±12.6 | 46.4±13.5 | <0.001 |
| Male gender | 169 (30.4) | 30 (21.9) | 0.05 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 13 (2.3) | 8 (5.8) | 0.03 |
| Hypertension | 56 (10.1) | 17 (12.4) | 0.42 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 15 (2.7) | 24 (17.5) | <0.001 |
| Chronic renal failure | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.7) | 0.28 |
| Echocardiographic data | |||
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 63.2±6.02 | 62.0±7.57 | 0.11 |
| Size of atrial septal defect (mm) | 23.7±7.28 | 26.9±9.08 | <0.001 |
| Peak TR pressure gradient (mm Hg) | 35.8±12.9 | 49.7±21.2 | <0.001 |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 93 (18.0) | 69 (51.1) | <0.001 |
| Maze procedure | 15 (2.7) | 20 (14.6) | <0.001 |
| Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min) | 68.1±26.6 | 82.9±31.2 | <0.001 |
| Aortic cross-clamp time (min) | 30.4±15.0 | 42.5±20.4 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
TR, tricuspid regurgitation.
Baseline characteristics compared between the TAP and non-TAP groups with significant TR
| Characteristic | TAP | Non-TAP | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 107 | 30 | |
| Age (yr) | 47.7±13.4 | 42.0±13.2 | 0.04 |
| Male gender | 25 (23.4) | 5 (16.7) | 0.43 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 7 (6.5) | 1 (3.3) | 0.50 |
| Hypertension | 15 (14.0) | 2 (10.0) | 0.28 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 22 (20.6) | 2 (6.7) | 0.07 |
| Chronic renal failure | 1 (0.9) | 0 | 0.59 |
| Echocardiographic data | |||
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 61.8±7.70 | 63.0±7.05 | 0.49 |
| Size of atrial septal defect (mm) | 26.4±9.27 | 29.2±8.04 | 0.15 |
| Peak TR pressure gradient (mm Hg) | 48.9±21.3 | 53.2±21.2 | 0.38 |
| TR | |||
| Grade III | 58 (54.2) | 27 (90.0) | <0.001 |
| Grade IV | 49 (45.8) | 3 (10.0) | <0.001 |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 52 (48.6) | 17 (56.7) | 0.49 |
| Approach | |||
| Sternotomy | 89 (83.1) | 24 (80.0) | |
| Thoracotomy | 18 (16.9) | 6 (20.0) | |
| AESOP | 7 (6.5) | 0 | |
| Da Vinci | 1 (0.9) | 0 | |
| Maze procedure | 18 (16.8) | 2 (6.7) | 0.16 |
| Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min) | 87.4±31.7 | 66.9±23.9 | 0.001 |
| Aortic cross-clamp time (min) | 45.8±20.8 | 29.0±11.9 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). The following instrument was used: AESOP (Automated Endoscope System for Optimal PositioningComputer Motion Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA), Da Vinci (Da Vinci Surgical System Intuitive Inc., Sunnydale, CA, USA).
TAP, tricuspid annuloplasty; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival, showing a 1-year survival rate of 99.4%, a 5-year survival rate of 96.8%, a 10-year survival rate of 94.5%, and a 20-year survival rate of 81.6%.
Postoperative complications
| Variable | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Cerebrovascular accident | 4 (0.57) |
| Postoperative bleeding | 9 (1.29) |
| Pericardial effusion | 5 (0.72) |
| Wound dehiscence | 6 (0.86) |
| Others | 8 (1.15) |
| Total | 32 (4.61) |
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival in patients with (A) AF, (B) pulmonary HTN, and (C) significant TR, showing that decreased survival was associated with pulmonary HTN and significant TR. AF, atrial fibrillation; HTN, hypertension; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.
Cox-regression analysis for preoperative characteristics predictive of mortality
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Age | 1.04 (1.02–1.06) | 0.001 | 1.03 (1.01–1.06) | 0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Sex | 1.04 (0.41–2.63) | 0.930 | - | |
|
| ||||
| Atrial fibrillation | 2.59 (1.10–6.07) | 0.028 | 1.08 (0.43–2.70) | 0.878 |
|
| ||||
| Significant tricuspid regurgitation | 2.80 (1.12–7.00) | 0.027 | 1.95 (1.09–3.16) | 0.023 |
|
| ||||
| Pulmonary hypertension | 2.26 (1.34–3.70) | 0.002 | 1.66 (0.94–2.94) | 0.080 |
|
| ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.92 (0.21–3.97) | 0.912 | - | |
|
| ||||
| Size of atrial septal defect | 1.02 (0.98–1.05) | 0.310 | - | |
|
| ||||
| Preoperative left ventricle ejection fraction | 0.98 (0.94–1.03) | 0.476 | - | |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3The tricuspid regurgitation grade decreased in both TAP and non-TAP groups after surgery. (A) Preoperative TAP group; (B) Postoperative TAP group; (C) Preoperative non-TAP group; (D) Postoperative non-TAP group. TR, tricuspid regurgitation; TAP, tricuspid annuloplasty.
Fig. 4Kaplan-Meier plots showed no significant difference in (A) overall survival, but a statistically significant difference in (B) freedom from TR between the TAP and non-TAP groups. TAP, tricuspid annuloplasty; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.