Literature DB >> 15001895

Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure.

Patrick M McCarthy1, Sunil K Bhudia, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, Katherine J Hoercher, Bruce W Lytle, Delos M Cosgrove, Eugene H Blackstone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare durability of tricuspid valve annuloplasty techniques, identify risk factors for repair failure, and characterize survival, reoperation, and functional class of surviving patients.
METHODS: From 1990 to 1999, 790 patients (mean age 65 +/- 12 years, 51% New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, and mean right ventricular systolic pressure 56 +/- 18 mm Hg) underwent tricuspid valve annuloplasty for functional regurgitation using 4 techniques: Carpentier-Edwards semi-rigid ring, Cosgrove-Edwards flexible band, De Vega procedure, and customized semicircular Peri-Guard annuloplasty. Of these patients, 89% had concomitant mitral valve surgery. A total of 2245 follow-up transthoracic echocardiograms were retrieved. Tricuspid regurgitation was analyzed, and risk factors for worsening regurgitation were identified, by multivariable ordinal longitudinal methods.
RESULTS: Tricuspid regurgitation 1 week after annuloplasty was 3+ or 4+ in 14% of patients. Regurgitation severity was stable across time with the Carpentier-Edwards ring (P =.7), increased slowly with the Cosgrove-Edwards band (P =.05), and rose more rapidly with the De Vega (P =.002) and Peri-Guard (P =.0009) procedures. Risk factors for worsening regurgitation included higher preoperative regurgitation grade, poor left ventricular function, permanent pacemaker, and repair type other than ring annuloplasty. Right ventricular systolic pressure, ring size, preoperative New York Heart Association functional class, and concomitant surgery were not risk factors. Tricuspid reoperation was rare (3% at 8 years), and hospital mortality after reoperation was 37%.
CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid valve annuloplasty did not consistently eliminate functional regurgitation, and across time regurgitation increased importantly after Peri-Guard and De Vega annuloplasties. Therefore, these repair techniques should be abandoned, and transtricuspid pacing leads should be replaced with epicardial leads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001895     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  103 in total

Review 1.  Tricuspid regurgitation: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Rashmi Thapa; Buddhadeb Dawn; Jayant Nath
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Management of tricuspid valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Manuel J Antunes; John B Barlow
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  When is your surgeon good enough? When do you need a "referent surgeon"?

Authors:  Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Adjustable tricuspid annuloplasty.

Authors:  Hiroshi Iida; Toru Sunazawa; Syunichi Kondo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-02

5.  eComment. Beyond the tricuspid annuloplasty techniques.

Authors:  Ovidio A Garcia-Villarreal; Graciela A Cepeda-Ayala
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10

6.  Transcatheter pledget-assisted suture tricuspid annuloplasty (PASTA) to create a double-orifice valve.

Authors:  Jaffar M Khan; Toby Rogers; William H Schenke; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Gaetano Paone; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Marcus Y Chen; Daniel A Herzka; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  New ring annuloplasty for extremely dilated tricuspid valve annulus: plication to physiologic septal segment size and over-reduction of posterior segment.

Authors:  Haruhiko Kondoh; Shinichi Hatsuoka; Hideo Shintani
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

Review 8.  Tricuspid valve repair for treatment and prevention of secondary tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Ani C Anyanwu; Joanna Chikwe; David H Adams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Reoperations after tricuspid valve repair: re-repair versus replacement.

Authors:  Ho Young Hwang; Kyung-Hwan Kim; Ki-Bong Kim; Hyuk Ahn
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Echocardiographic assessment and clinical management of tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Nicole M Bhave; R Parker Ward
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.