| Literature DB >> 28382158 |
Ronghui Wang1, Yang Zhou1, Ping Zhang1, Yu Chen2, Wei Gao1, Jinshun Xu1, Hangrong Chen2, Xiaojun Cai2, Kun Zhang2, Pan Li1, Zhigang Wang1, Bing Hu3, Tao Ying3, Yuanyi Zheng4.
Abstract
Activating droplets vaporization has become an attractive strategy for ultrasound imaging and physical therapy due to the significant increase in ultrasound backscatter signals and its ability to physically damage the tumor cells. However, the current two types of transitional droplets named after their activation methods have their respective limitations. To circumvent the limitations of these activation methods, here we report the concept of magnetic droplet vaporization (MDV) for stimuli-responsive cancer theranostics by a magnetic-responsive phase-transitional agent. This magnetic-sensitive phase-transitional agent-perfluorohexane (PFH)-loaded porous magnetic microspheres (PFH-PMMs), with high magnetic-thermal energy-transfer capability, could quickly respond to external alternating current (AC) magnetic fields to produce thermal energy and trigger the vaporization of the liquid PFH. We systematically demonstrated MDV both in vitro and in vivo. This novel trigger method with deep penetration can penetrate the air-filled viscera and trigger the vaporization of the phase-transitional agent without the need of pre-focusing lesion. This unique MDV strategy is expected to substantially broaden the biomedical applications of nanotechnology and promote the clinical treatment of tumors that are not responsive to chemical therapies.Entities:
Keywords: Magnetic droplet vaporization; Phase transition; Ultrasound imaging.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28382158 PMCID: PMC5381248 DOI: 10.7150/thno.17251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Schematics of tailored PFH encapsulation of PMMs for the novel MDV Stratery: a. Procedure for PFH-PMMs synthesis and the release of PFH-bubbles under an alternating current magnetic field (ACMF); b. PFH-PMMs in vivo subjected to heat treatment in nude mice.
Figure 2Characterization of PMMs by various imaging techniques: a-b. SEM images, c. STEM images, d. TEM images, e. element mapping f. element mapping corresponding line scans of PMMs corresponding line scans of PMMs.
Figure 3PFH-PMMs heating effect and MDV validation using optical microscopy: a. In vitro Infrared thermal images of heating in vitro; b. corresponding temperature-time curves; c-d. optical microscopy images of 40 mg mL-1 PFH-PMMs pre- (c) and post- (d) AC magnetic field exposure for 3 min.
Figure 4Evaluation of imaging performance: a. Ultrasound images of saline, 10 mg mL-1 PMMs and different concentrations of PFH-PMMs in vitro; b-c. corresponding quantification of gray scale images in B-Mode and CEUS. * indicates significant differences (P≤0.05) based on gray scale values pre- and post-AC magnetic field irradiation (1'-5' separately represent saline, 10mg /mL PMMs, 10 mg/mL PFH-PMMs, 20 mg/mL PFH-PMMs, 40 mg/mL PFH-PMMs).
Figure 5Infrared and ultrasound images in nude mice following various treatments: a. Infrared thermal images of thermotherapy temperatures in nude mice after intratumoral administration of saline, PFH, 40 mg mL-1 PMMs or 40 mg mL-1 PFH-PMMs; b. ultrasound images of tumors injected with saline, 40 mg mL-1 PMMs or 40 mg mL-1 PFH-PMMs pre- and post-magnetic heating treatment.
Figure 6In vivo effects of PMMs and PFH-PMMS: a. Tumor (MDA-MB-231)-bearing nude mice treated with saline, PMMs and PFH-PMMs shown before and 14 days after a second magnetic heating treatment; b. Tumor growth curve of saline, PMMs and PFH-PMMs group after the exposure to the A.C. magnetic field. c. histopathological sections of tumor tissues from nude mice from the saline, PMMs and PFH-PMMs group.