| Literature DB >> 28381315 |
Elena Biasibetti1, Alberto Valazza1, Maria T Capucchio2, Laura Annovazzi3, Luigi Battaglia4, Daniela Chirio4, Marina Gallarate4, Marta Mellai3, Elisabetta Muntoni4, Elena Peira4, Chiara Riganti5, Davide Schiffer3, Pierpaolo Panciani6, Michele Lanotte6.
Abstract
Research in neurooncology traditionally requires appropriate in vivo animal models, on which therapeutic strategies are tested before human trials are designed and proceed. Several reproducible animal experimental models, in which human physiologic conditions can be mimicked, are available for studying glioblastoma multiforme. In an ideal rat model, the tumor is of glial origin, grows in predictable and reproducible patterns, closely resembles human gliomas histopathologically, and is weakly or nonimmunogenic. In the current study, we used MRI and histopathologic evaluation to compare the most widely used allogeneic rat glioma model, C6-Wistar, with the F98-Fischer syngeneic rat glioma model in terms of percentage tumor growth or regression and growth rate. In vivo MRI demonstrated considerable variation in tumor volume and frequency between the 2 rat models despite the same stereotactic implantation technique. Faster and more reproducible glioma growth occurred in the immunoresponsive environment of the F98-Fischer model, because the immune response is minimized toward syngeneic cells. The marked inability of the C6-Wistar allogeneic system to generate a reproducible model and the episodes of spontaneous tumor regression with this system may have been due to the increased humoral and cellular immune responses after tumor implantation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28381315 PMCID: PMC5402734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comp Med ISSN: 1532-0820 Impact factor: 0.982