Literature DB >> 28379524

Evaluation of USDA approved antimicrobials on the reduction of Salmonella and Campylobacter in ground chicken frames and their effect on meat quality.

A Moore1, R Nannapaneni2, A Kiess1, C S Sharma1.   

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of USDA approved antimicrobials in reducing Salmonella Heidelberg (S. H.) and Campylobacter jejuni (C. j.) in ground chicken frames and to determine the treatment effects on total aerobic counts and meat color. Six antimicrobials (0.1% peracetic acid [PAA], 0.6% cetylpyridinium chloride [CPC], 0.005% sodium hypochlorite, 1.5% acidified lactic acid [ALA], 0.3% propionic acid, and 0.1% lauric arginate [LAE]) applied as dip treatments were evaluated in their efficacy in reducing S. Heidelberg and C. jejuni. Fresh chicken frames were spot inoculated with nalidixic acid resistant S. H. and C. j. (ATCC 33291) to achieve a recovery level of ca. 3 log CFU/g in the ground product. Frames were dipped for 10 s in each antimicrobial solution and each treatment was replicated on 3 frames. Three separate replications were conducted for this experiment. Frames were blended, and ground samples similar to mechanically separated chicken (MSC) were obtained and stored at 4°C for 24 hours. Samples were analyzed after grinding on d zero (2 h) and d one (24 h) to determine reduction in S. H. and C. j. counts in MSC. PAA and LAE treatments had the highest reductions on Salmonella counts (P ≤ 0.05), both treatments resulting in 0.9 log CFU/g reduction as compared to control on d zero. PAA and CPC reduced Salmonella counts by 1.4 and 0.9 log CFU/g, respectively, on d one; PAA, propionic acid, ALA, and LAE resulted in one log CFU/g reductions of C. j. as compared to control on d one. There was no significant difference among the treatments in their ability to reduce C. j. on d one. The treatments had no effect on total aerobic counts. The findings from the study indicate that PAA, CPC, and LAE can reduce S. H. in ground chicken frames, whereas all the antimicrobials tested in the study, except chlorine, have the ability to reduce C. j. in ground chicken frames, a product similar to commercial MSC.
© 2017 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; Salmonella; comminuted poultry; food safety; mechanically separated chicken

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28379524     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

1.  Effects of lactic, malic and fumaric acids on Salmonella spp. counts and on chicken meat quality and sensory characteristics.

Authors:  Marina Mozgovoj; Mariana Cap; Mariano Fernández; Anabel Rodríguez; Micaela Fulco; Trinidad Soteras
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Inactivation methods for human coronavirus 229E on various food-contact surfaces and foods.

Authors:  Eun Seo Choi; Sangha Han; Jeong Won Son; Gyeong Bae Song; Sang-Do Ha
Journal:  Food Control       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.652

3.  Modeling the Reduction and Cross-Contamination of Salmonella in Poultry Chilling Process in China.

Authors:  Xingning Xiao; Wen Wang; Jianmin Zhang; Ming Liao; Hua Yang; Weihuan Fang; Yanbin Li
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-10-13

4.  Characterization of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Stages of the Processing Lines at Four Broiler Processing Plants in Trinidad and Tobago.

Authors:  Anisa Sarah Khan; Karla Georges; Saed Rahaman; Woubit Abebe; Abiodun Adewale Adesiyun
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 5.  A Review of Salmonella and Campylobacter in Broiler Meat: Emerging Challenges and Food Safety Measures.

Authors:  Hudson T Thames; Anuraj T Sukumaran
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-06-11

6.  The Effect of Sanitizers on Microbial Levels of Chicken Meat Collected from Commercial Processing Plants.

Authors:  Kapil Chousalkar; Sarah Sims; Andrea McWhorter; Samiullah Khan; Margaret Sexton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Prevalence of Salmonella enterica on poultry processing equipment after completion of sanitization procedures.

Authors:  Tomi Obe; Rama Nannapaneni; Wes Schilling; Li Zhang; Chris McDaniel; Aaron Kiess
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Application of Amplon in combination with peroxyacetic acid for the reduction of nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Reading on skin-on, bone-in tom turkey drumsticks.

Authors:  E G Olson; L A Wythe; D K Dittoe; K M Feye; S C Ricke
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.