BACKGROUND: Although many genetic and nongenetic factors interact to determine an individual's physical phenotype, there has been limited examination of the contribution of family history of exceptional parental longevity on decline in physical function in aging. METHODS: The LonGenity study recruited a relatively genetically homogenous cohort of Ashkenazi Jewish adults age 65 and older, who were defined as either offspring of parents with exceptional longevity ([OPEL]: having at least one parent who lived to age 95 or older) or offspring of parents with usual survival ([OPUS]: neither parent survived to age 95). Decline in performance on objective measures of strength (grip strength), balance (unipedal stance), and mobility (gait speed) as well as a composite physical function measure, the Short physical performance battery (SPPB), were compared between the two groups over a median follow-up of 3.2 years, accounting for age, sex, education, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 984 LonGenity participants (mean age 76, 55% women), 448 were OPEL and 536 were OPUS. Compared to OPUS, OPEL had slower decline on measures of unipedal stance (-0.03 log-units/year, p = .026), repeated chair rise (0.13 s/year, p = .020) and SPPB (-0.11 points/year, p = .002). OPEL women had slower decline on chair rise and SPPB scores compared to OPUS women, although OPEL men had slower decline on unipedal stance compared to OPUS men. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that variation in late-life decline in physical function is associated with familial longevity, and may vary for men and women.
BACKGROUND: Although many genetic and nongenetic factors interact to determine an individual's physical phenotype, there has been limited examination of the contribution of family history of exceptional parental longevity on decline in physical function in aging. METHODS: The LonGenity study recruited a relatively genetically homogenous cohort of Ashkenazi Jewish adults age 65 and older, who were defined as either offspring of parents with exceptional longevity ([OPEL]: having at least one parent who lived to age 95 or older) or offspring of parents with usual survival ([OPUS]: neither parent survived to age 95). Decline in performance on objective measures of strength (grip strength), balance (unipedal stance), and mobility (gait speed) as well as a composite physical function measure, the Short physical performance battery (SPPB), were compared between the two groups over a median follow-up of 3.2 years, accounting for age, sex, education, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 984 LonGenity participants (mean age 76, 55% women), 448 were OPEL and 536 were OPUS. Compared to OPUS, OPEL had slower decline on measures of unipedal stance (-0.03 log-units/year, p = .026), repeated chair rise (0.13 s/year, p = .020) and SPPB (-0.11 points/year, p = .002). OPEL women had slower decline on chair rise and SPPB scores compared to OPUS women, although OPEL men had slower decline on unipedal stance compared to OPUS men. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that variation in late-life decline in physical function is associated with familial longevity, and may vary for men and women.
Authors: D Carmelli; M Kelly-Hayes; P A Wolf; G E Swan; L M Jack; T Reed; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: J David Curb; Clementina D Ceria-Ulep; Beatriz L Rodriguez; John Grove; Jack Guralnik; Brad J Willcox; Tim A Donlon; Kamal H Masaki; Randi Chen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: J Walston; D E Arking; D Fallin; T Li; B Beamer; Q Xue; L Ferrucci; L P Fried; A Chakravarti Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Jersey Liang; Joan M Bennett; Benjamin A Shaw; Ana R Quiñones; Wen Ye; Xiao Xu; Mary Beth Ofstedal Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Ann Z Moore; Mary L Biggs; Amy Matteini; Ashley O'Connor; Sarah McGuire; Brock A Beamer; M Danielle Fallin; Linda P Fried; Jeremy Walston; Aravinda Chakravarti; Dan E Arking Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stephen R Lord; Susan M Murray; Kirsten Chapman; Bridget Munro; Anne Tiedemann Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Aladdin H Shadyab; JoAnn E Manson; Wenjun Li; Margery Gass; Robert L Brunner; Michelle J Naughton; Brad Cannell; Barbara V Howard; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 10.668