| Literature DB >> 28378813 |
Natarajan Karikalan1, Raj Karthik1, Shen-Ming Chen1, Hsi-An Chen1.
Abstract
We reported an electrochemical determination ofEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28378813 PMCID: PMC5381119 DOI: 10.1038/srep45924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1XRD pattern (a), Raman spectrum (b), TEM image (c) high resolution N1s spectrum (d), EIS (e) and EDAX spectra (f) of NDC.
Figure 2CV responses of bare GCE, GO/GCE and NDC/GCE in 0.1 M KCl containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− (a) and the different scan rate from 20–200 mV/s (b), inset shows the corresponding plot of square root of scan rate vs peak current. The CVs of bare GCE, GO/GCE and NDC/GCE in 0.05 M PB solution, in the absence (c) and presence of 200 μM CA (d).
Figure 3The CV curves of NDC/GCE in 0.05 M PB solution containing 200 μM CA for the different scan rates ranging from 20 to 300 mV/s (a) and the corresponding plot of redox peak current vs. scan rate in (b).
Figure 4The CV responses of the oxidation of CA at NDC/GCE in various pHs ranging from 3.0 to 11.0 (a). The CV curves of NDC/GCE in various concentrations of CA ranging from 0 to 1100 μM (b) and the corresponding plot of redox peak current vs. concentration of CA (c). The ratio of the redox peak currents of CA is plotted against the concentration of CA, which follows the linearity with the slope of 0.0356 (d).
Figure 5The DPV responses of NDC/GCE in various concentrations of CA from 0.01 to 1100 μM in 0.05 M PB solution (a) and the corresponding calibration plot shown in inset. (b) Calibration data for the determination of CA by the DPV method for three duplicated measurements with n standards. (c) The DPV responses of CA oxidation in presence of potential interference, such as catechol (CT), gallic acid (GA), ferulic acid (FA), ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA) (b). (d) The DPV interference signals of CT (a), GA (b), FA (c), AA (d), UA (e), Na+ (f), K+ (g), Mg2+ (h), Ni2+ (i), Cu2+ (j), Cl− (k), NO3− (l), SO42− (m), glucose (n), DA (o) and H2O2 (p) where CA is the standard for comparison.
Comparison of the developed NDC/GCE-CA sensor with other reported CA sensors.
| Modified electrodes | Method | Linear range (μM) | Limit of detection (μM) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecularly imprinted siloxanes | DPV | 0.500–60.0 | 0.15 | |
| RGO/PDA | DPV | 0.005–450.5 | 0.0012 | |
| Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide–Nafion | SWAdSV | 0.1–10 | 0.09 | |
| Laccase-MWCNT-chitosan/Au | Amperometric | 0.7–10 | 0.15 | |
| Nafion/Tyre/Sonogel-Carbon | Amperometric | 0.08–2 | 0.06 | |
| Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and graphene nanosheet (GN) modified glassy carbon electrode | CV | 0.5–50 | 0.05 | |
| Graphene oxide nanosheets | DPV | 0.5–100 | 0.0011 | |
| Glassy polymeric carbon | DPV | 96.5–0.1 | 0.29 | |
| Activated GCE | CV | 0.1–1 | 0.068 | |
| Glassy carbon electrode | DPV | 10–120 | 0.1 | |
| Nitrogen doped carbon/GCE | DPV | 0.01–350 | 0.0024 | This work |
Figure 6The CV responses of CA oxidation at NDC/GCE for the 200 μM CA recorded in 0.05 M solution of various electrolytes such as KNO3, KCl, K2SO4, KOH, Na2SO4, and H2SO4 at the scan rate of 50 mV/s.
Figure 7The DPV responses of CA oxidation at NDC/GCE for consecutive 20 measurements (a) and the determination CA in red wine sample (b).
Determination of CA in red wines by NDC/GCE-CA sensor.
| Red wine sample | Found (μM) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|
| A | 98.4 | 2.1 |
| B | 72.6 | 2.3 |
| C | 81.5 | 2.0 |
| D | 78.6 | 2.1 |
| E | 65.4 | 2.5 |