| Literature DB >> 28377716 |
Danilo Degregorio1, Serena D'Avino1, Silvia Castrignanò1, Giovanna Di Nardo1, Sheila J Sadeghi1, Gianluca Catucci1, Gianfranco Gilardi1.
Abstract
class="Species">Human liverEntities:
Keywords: P450 biocatalysis; domain interaction; electron transfer; glycine linker; stability; uncoupling
Year: 2017 PMID: 28377716 PMCID: PMC5359286 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1(A) Surface charge distribution of P450 3A4 (left, PDB ID 1TQN) and the FMN binding domain of P450 BM3 (right, PDB ID 1BVY). Heme and FMN are shown in black. (B) Complex between P450 3A4 and the FMN binding domain of BMR. The complex was created by super-imposition of the crystal structure of P450 3A4 with the heme domain of P450 BM3 in the complex crystal structure.
Figure 2(A) Schematic illustration of the chimeras construction strategy. (B) SDS-PAGE of the purified chimeric proteins.
Figure 3Left: UV-vis spectra of the purified cytochrome P450 3A4 (A), 3A4-BMR (B), 3A4-3GLY-BMR (C), and 3A4-5GLY-BMR (D) in their oxidized (black line), reduced (dashed line), and reduced/carbon monoxide-bound (dark gray line) forms. Sodium dithionite completely reduces the flavin cofactors in all enzymes, leading to spectral bleaching. Binding of carbon monoxide results in the formation of Fe2+-CO complex with heme Soret absorption maxima shifted to 450 nm in all cases. Right: Time-dependent decrease of the absorbance at 450 nm of the CO-bound cytochrome P450 3A4 (E), 3A4-BMR (F), 3A4-3GLY-BMR (G), and 3A4-5GLY-BMR (H). CO binding loss is significantly higher, in terms of both rate and total absorbance decrease, for CYP 3A4 compared to the three BMR linked chimeras. Insets: difference spectra generated by subtraction of the reduced P450 spectrum to each Fe2+-CO complex spectrum.
Heme and flavin contents obtained for 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR, and 3A4-5GLY-BMR.
| Heme content (nmolheme/nmol protein) | 0.97 ± 0.03 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.02 |
| FMN content (nmol FMN/nmol protein) | 0.82 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.83 ± 0.05 |
| FAD content (nmol FAD/nmol protein) | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.02 |
Figure 4Anaerobic NADPH oxidation rates for cytochrome P450 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMRand 3A4-5GLY-BMR compared to those obtained for CYP 3A4 + hCPR system, obtained both in absence (white bars) and in presence of substrate erythromycin (light gray) and testosterone (dark gray). Data are mean ± SD for 3 to 6 replicates. *P < 0.001 compared to CYP 3A4 + hCPR system; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.001 compared to the protein in absence of substrate; two way ANOVA.
Catalysis and uncoupling parameters for erythromycin N-demethylation and testosterone 6β-hydroxylation for 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR, and 3A4-5GLY-BMR.
| 3A4-BMR | 20.8 ± 3.6 | 0.0515 ± 0.0004 | 9.4 ± 0.5 | 19.6 ± 2.6 | 0.0066 ± 0.0002 | 3.4 ± 0.1 |
| 3A4-3GLY-BMR | 27.4 ± 4.0 | 0.1177 ± 0.0006 | 10.0 ± 0.8 | 21.3 ± 2.7 | 0.0089 ± 0.0002 | 4.6 ± 0.1 |
| 3A4-5GLY-BMR | 21.3 ± 4.4 | 0.1387 ± 0.0009 | 12.5 ± 0.9 | 19.8 ± 2.2 | 0.0113 ± 0.0003 | 5.8 ± 0.2 |
Coupling parameters are determined at saturating erythromycin (120 μM) and testosterone(150 μM) concentrations. Values are means ± standard deviation of four experiments.
The coupling efficiency is calculated as: HCHO × 100/NADPH consumed.
The coupling efficiency is calculated as 6β-hydroxytestosterone × 100/NADPH consumed.
Figure 5Activity and coupling of the 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR and 3A4-5GLY-BMR chimeras toward erythromycin N-demethylation. (A) Catalytic activity measured as HCHO production rate in the presence of 3A4-BMR (circles), 3A4-3GLY-BMR (triangles) and 3A4-5GLY-BMR (squares) as function of erythromycin concentration fitted with MichaelisMenten curves. (B) Summary of Vmax-values calculated during erythromycin N-demethylation in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR and 3A4-5GLY-BMR. (C) Summary of coupling percentage values calculated during erythromycin N-demethylation in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR and 3A4-5GLY-BMR. (D) Catalytic activity measured as 6β-hydroxytestosterone production rate in the presence of 3A4-BMR (circles), 3A4-3GLY-BMR (triangles) and 3A4-5GLY-BMR (squares) as function of testosterone concentration fitted with Michaelis Menten curves. (E) Summary of Vmax-values calculated during testosterone 6β-hydroxylation in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR and 3A4-5GLY-BMR. (F) Summary of coupling percentage values calculated during testosterone6β-hydroxylation in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4-BMR, 3A4-3GLY-BMR and 3A4-5GLY-BMR. All reactions were carried out at 37°C for 30 min. Data are mean ± SD of at least 3 replicates. R2> 0.99. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001 compared to 3A4-BMR, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.001 compared to 3A4-3GLY-BMR, one way ANOVA.
Figure 6Summary of NADPH-cytochrome . Data obtained in the presence of 0% glycerol (black bars) and 20% glycerol (gray bars) are shown. They are mean ± SD of at least 3 replicates. *P < 0.001 vs. 0% glycerol; #P < 0.001 vs. 3A4 BMR and 3GLY(two way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
Figure 7Model of BMR-P450 active complex formation and interaction in the three different chimeric proteins. The length of the inter-domains loop favors the formation of different types of complexes that can justify different electron transfer rates, turnover and coupling efficiency. P (proline), S (serine), and R (arginine) are the three amino acids common to the three chimeras. G is glycine.