| Literature DB >> 28377388 |
Emilie Catry1, Laure B Bindels1, Anne Tailleux2,3,4,5, Sophie Lestavel2,3,4,5, Audrey M Neyrinck1, Jean-François Goossens6,7, Irina Lobysheva8, Hubert Plovier1,9, Ahmed Essaghir10, Jean-Baptiste Demoulin10, Caroline Bouzin11, Barbara D Pachikian1, Patrice D Cani1,9, Bart Staels2,3,4,5, Chantal Dessy8, Nathalie M Delzenne1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the beneficial role of prebiotics on endothelial dysfunction, an early key marker of cardiovascular diseases, in an original mouse model linking steatosis and endothelial dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: BILE ACID METABOLISM; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; ENDOCRINE HORMONES; INTESTINAL MICROBIOLOGY; PREBIOTIC
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28377388 PMCID: PMC5868295 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Figure 1Endothelium-dependent relaxation. (A) Endothelium-dependent relaxation of preconstricted mesenteric arteries (N=7–11) and (B) in presence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor (Nω-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 100 µM) (N=7–11). (C) Circulating haem-nitrosylated haemoglobin (Hb-NO) levels (N=15–18). (D) Endothelium-dependent relaxation of preconstricted carotid arteries (N=5–6). (E) Western blot analyses on mesenteric arteries with anti-caveolin-1, anti-phosphorylated endothelial NOS (eNOS)ser1177, anti-eNOS and anti-β actin. (F) Densitometric analyses of stained membranes (N=5–6). Data are expressed as mean±SEM and analysed by one-way or two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's or Bonferroni's post-tests: * versus WT DEF, $ versus WT DEF ITF, # versus KO DEF.
Figure 2Resting parameters and vascular reactivity of mesenteric arteries. (A) Resting tone (N=7–11). (B) Normalised vessel diameter (N=7–11). (C) Maximal contraction in response of KCl-enriched solution (50 mM) (N=7–11). (D) Intima-media thickness of first order mesenteric arteries (N=6–8) and (E) representative pictures (scale bar=100 µm). Data are expressed as mean±SEM and analysed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-tests: * versus WT DEF, $ versus WT DEF ITF, # versus KO DEF.
Figure 3Microarray analysis on the caecal tissue. Heatmap from microarray analysis representing the top 50 upregulated genes in the caecum, based on the list of genes upregulated by 1.5-fold between KO DEF ITF and KO DEF mice. Data are expressed as mean log2 expression.
Figure 4Inulin-type fructans (ITF) treatment profoundly modifies the composition of the caecal microbiota. (A) Shannon and Simpson Indexes. (B) Simpson Evenness and Heip Indexes. (C) Chao1 and Observed Species Indexes. (D) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of Morisita-Horn Index and (E) of weighted UniFrac Index at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level (Adonis method, 1000 permutations, p<0.001 for both PCoAs). (F) Pie charts presenting the relative mean abundance of phyla. (G) Relative abundance of the most increased bacterial taxa by ITF treatment. (H) Relative abundance of the most decreased bacterial taxa by ITF treatment. Data (N=15–18) are expressed as mean±SEM and analysed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-tests: * versus WT DEF, $ versus WT DEF ITF, # versus KO DEF.
Figure 5LEfSe cladograms reveal enrichment in several bacterial taxa upon prebiotic supplementation. Discriminant analyses using LEfSe. Bacterial taxa enriched in inulin-type fructans (ITF)-treated mice appear in green and bacterial taxa enriched in untreated mice appear in red.
Figure 6Bile acid (BA) metabolism affected by inulin-type fructans (ITF) supplementation in KO genotype. (A) Genes involved in BA biosynthesis and its regulation (N=11–12). (B) Genes involved in the enterohepatic cycle (N=8–12). (C) Ratio of free and conjugated to total BAs in systemic blood (N=6). (D) Systemic BA profile (N=6). (E) Ratio of free and conjugated to total BAs in portal blood (N=5–6). (F) Portal BA profile (N=5–6). (G) Ratio of free and conjugated to total BAs in caecal content (N=6). (H) Caecal BA profile (N=6). Data are expressed as mean±SEM and analysed by unpaired t-test: # versus KO DEF.
Figure 7Heatmap representation of the Spearman's r correlation coefficient between caecal bile acid profile and bacterial taxa. Only the bacteria, for which at least one significant correlation to bile acid levels was found, are displayed (c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus; s, species). *Adjusted p value <0.05.
Figure 8Prebiotic treatment increases glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) production. (A) Active GLP-1 concentration (N=9–10). (B) Proglucagon (Gcg), NeuroD1, neurogenin 3 (Ngn3) and prohormone convertase 1/3 (PC1/3) expression in proximal colon (N=7–8). (C) L cell density in proximal colon (N=6–8). (D) Representative immunofluorescence staining for L cell density. CK8+18 (green), GLP-1 (red) and DNA (blue) in proximal colon (scale bar=200 µm). Data are expressed as mean±SEM and analysed by unpaired t-test: # versus KO n-3 PUFA-depleted (DEF). (E) Heatmap representation of the Spearman's r correlation coefficient between caecal expression of gene highlighted by the microarray analysis and confirmed by qPCR, and bacterial taxa. Only the bacteria for which at least one significant correlation to genes expression was found, are displayed (c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus; s, species). *Adjusted p value <0.05.