| Literature DB >> 28376899 |
Seema Gulati1,2,3, Anoop Misra4,5,6,7,8, Ravindra M Pandey9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are more prevalent and severe in Asian Indians. Simple diet-based strategies are important for prevention of cardiovascular diseases.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of oats consumption on lipid parameters in mildly hypercholesterolemic Asian Indians living in India.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28376899 PMCID: PMC5381086 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0460-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Study design
Changes in anthropometric parameters and blood pressure after intervention with oats
| Per protocol | Intention-to-treata | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | |||||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Difference (95% CI) |
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Difference |
| ||
| ANTHROPOMETRY | |||||||||
| Body Weight (Kg) | Baseline | 71.2 ± 10.5 | 69.9 ± 9.3 | - | 0.6 | 71.3 ± 11.1 | 70.4 ± 9.42 | - | 0.7 |
| Post intervention | 71.3 ± 10.4 | 69.6 ± 9.5 | 1.6 (−3.2, 6.4) | 0.5 | 71.3 ± 11.1 | 70.1 ± 9.4 | 1.16 (−3.4, 5.7) | 0.6 | |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | Baseline | 93.8 ± 7.8 | 92.9 ± 9.2 | - | 0.7 | 94.5 ± 8.8 | 93.2 ± 9.3 | - | 0.5 |
| Post intervention | 93.6 ± 8.3 | 91.8 ± 8.3 | 1.8 (−2.2, 5.8) | 0.4 | 94.3 ± 9.4 | 92.1 ± 8.6 | 0.3 | ||
| Hip Circumference (cm) | Baseline | 96.9 ± 6.3 | 96.3 ± 6.9 | - | 0.7 | 98.7 ± 9.8 | 96.5 ± 7.1 | - | 0.3 |
| Post intervent ion | 96.9 ± 7.1 | 95.5 ± 7.3 | 1.5 (−1.9, 4.9) | 0.4 | 98.7 ± 10.3 | 95.8 ± 7.3 | 2.9 (−0.9, 6.8) | 0.2 | |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) (Kg/m2) | Baseline | 25.9 ± 2.7 | 25.2 ± 3.5 | - | 0.3 | 26.3 ± 3.9 | 25.5 ± 3.6 | - | 0.3 |
| Post intervention | 25.9 ± 2.7 | 25.1 ± 3.5 | 0.83 (−0.7, 2.4) | 0.3 | 26.3 ± 3.9 | 25.4 ± 3.6 | 0.9 (−0.7, 2.6) | 0.3 | |
| BLOOD PRESSURE | |||||||||
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | Baseline | 117.1 ± 13.7 | 118.2 ± 9.8 | - | 0.7 | 117.4 ± 12.9 | 117.8 ± 9.4 | - | 0.9 |
| Post intervention | 117.4 ± 8.2 | 117.6 ± 8.1 | −0.3 (−4.2, 3.6) | 0.8 | 117.6 ± 8.3 | 117.4 ± 7.8 | 0.2 (−3.4, 3.8) | 0.9 | |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | Baseline | 74.5 ± 8.7 | 75.8 ± 7.5 | - | 0.5 | 74.8 ± 8.4 | 75.6 ± 7.2 | - | 0.6 |
| Post intervention | 74.7 ± 5.01 | 75.3 ± 6.2 | −0.6 (−3.3, 2.1) | 0.6 | 74.9 ± 5.3 | 75.2 ± 6.1 | −0.3 (−2.8, 2.3) | 0.8 | |
aSubjects who were not available post intervention, pre-intervention values were carried forward as post intervention values assuming that intervention did not have an effect on them
Changes in lipid parameters after intervention with oats
| Per protocol | Intention-to-treata | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | |||||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Difference (95% CI) |
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Difference |
| ||
| LIPID PARAMETER | |||||||||
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Baseline ( | 217.2 ± 11.4 | 217.3 ± 10.9 | - | 0.8 | 218.1 ± 11.9 | 217.1 ± 10.5 | - | 0.7 |
| Post intervention | 208.7 ± 24.3 | 197.4 ± 21.7 | 11.3 (0.18, 22.3) | 0.04* | 210.9 ± 23.3 | 199.2 ± 21.2 | 11.8 (1.8, 21.7) | 0.02* | |
| % Reduction | 4.0 ± 9.0 | 9.0 ± 9.7 | −5.0 (−9.5, −.5) | 0.03 | 3.3 ± 8.3 | 8.1 ± 9.6 | −4.8 (−8.8, −.8) | 0.01* | |
| Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Baseline | 145.5 ± 17.7 | 144.4 ± 15.7 | - | 0.8 | 144.9 ± 16.4 | 145.1 ± 15.4 | - | 0.9 |
| Post intervention | 137.5 ± 28.4 | 124.9 ± 20.2 | 12.5 (0.8, 24.3) | 0.04* | 138.4 ± 25.9 | 127.6 ± 21.0 | 10.8 0.29, 22.3) | 0.04* | |
| % Reduction | 5.1 ± 17.9 | 12.9 ± 14.0 | −7.8 (−15.5, −.11) | 0.04* | 4.1 ± 16.3 | 11.6 ± 13.8 | −7.4(−14.1, −0.7) | 0.03* | |
| Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Baseline | 31.5 ± 11.3 | 32.4 ± 11.9 | - | 0.8 | 32.4 ± 10.9 | 32.7 ± 12.5 | 0.9 | |
| Post intervention | 34.1 ± 16.1 | 32.9 ± 13.4 | 1.2 (−5.9, 8.3) | 0.7 | 43.5 ± 15.1 | 33.2 ± 13.8 | 1.4 (−5.1, 7.8) | 0.7 | |
| % Reduction | −21.8 ± 73.0 | −7.1 ± 39.9 | −14.7 (−42.7, 13.2) | 0.3 | −18.0 ± 66.7 | −6.3 ± 37.9 | −11.6 (−35.7, 12.5) | 0.3 | |
| Serum Triglycerides (mg/dL) | Baseline | 157.6 ± 56.2 | 161.9 ± 59.4 | - | 0.8 | 162.2 ± 54.7 | 163.6 ± 62.5 | - | 0.9 |
| Post intervention | 170.3 ± 80.6 | 164.4 ± 67.2 | 5.9 (−29.6, 41.5) | 0.7 | 172.7 ± 75.2 | 165.8 ± 69.2 | 6.8 (−25.3, 38.9) | 0.7 | |
| % Reduction | −21.8 ± 73.0 | −7.1 ± 39.9 | −14.7 (−42.7, 13.2) | 0.3 | −18.0 ± 66.7 | −6.4 ± 37.9 | −11.6(−35.8, 12.5) | 0.34 | |
| High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Baseline | 39.1 ± 8.3 | 41.5 ± 12.5 | - | 0.4 | 39.6 ± 8.1 | 41.2 ± 12.1 | 0.5 | |
| Post intervention | 37.1 ± 7.2 | 39.4 ± 9.5 | −2.4 (−6.5, 1.7) | 0.2 | 37.9 ± 7.3 | 39.3 ± 9.3 | −1.5 (−5.2, 2.3) | 0.4 | |
| % Reduction | 3.8 ± 15.1 | 3.3 ± 14.1 | 0.5(−6.5, 7.5) | 0.9 | 3.1 ± 13.7 | 2.9 ± 13.3 | 0.2 (−5.8, 6.2) | 0.9 | |
aSubjects who were not available post intervention, pre-intervention values were carried forward as post intervention values assuming that intervention did not have an effect on them
*p < 0.05: statistically significant