Background: In a European cohort, it was previously reported that 35% of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients were human papillomavirus type-16 (HPV16) seropositive up to 10 years before diagnosis vs 0.6% of cancer-free controls. Here, we describe the kinetics of HPV16-E6 antibodies prior to OPC diagnosis. Methods: We used annual serial prediagnostic blood samples from the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial. Antibodies to HPV were initially assessed in prediagnostic blood drawn at study enrollment from 198 incident head and neck cancer patients (median years to cancer diagnosis = 6.6) and 924 matched control subjects using multiplex serology, and subsequently in serial samples (median = 5/individual). Available tumor samples were identified and tested for HPV16 RNA to define HPV-driven OPC. Results: HPV16-E6 antibodies were present at baseline in 42.3% of 52 OPC patients and 0.5% of 924 control subjects. HPV16-E6 antibody levels were highly elevated and stable across serial blood samples for 21 OPC patients who were seropositive at baseline, as well as for one OPC patient who seroconverted closer to diagnosis. All five subjects with HPV16-driven OPC tumors were HPV16-E6-seropositive, and the four subjects with HPV16-negative OPC tumors were seronegative. The estimated 10-year cumulative risk of OPC was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8% to 21.5%) for HPV16-E6-seropositive men, 1.3% (95% CI = 0.1% to 15.3%) for HPV16-E6-seropositive women, and 0.04% (95% CI = 0.03% to 0.06%) among HPV16-E6-seronegative individuals. Conclusions: Forty-two percent of subjects diagnosed with OPC between 1994 and 2009 in a US cohort were HPV16-E6 seropositive, with stable antibody levels during annual follow-up for up to 13 years prior to diagnosis. Tumor analysis indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of HPV16-E6 antibodies were exceptionally high in predicting HPV-driven OPC. Published by Oxford University Press 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Background: In a European cohort, it was previously reported that 35% of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients were human papillomavirus type-16 (HPV16) seropositive up to 10 years before diagnosis vs 0.6% of cancer-free controls. Here, we describe the kinetics of HPV16-E6 antibodies prior to OPC diagnosis. Methods: We used annual serial prediagnostic blood samples from the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial. Antibodies to HPV were initially assessed in prediagnostic blood drawn at study enrollment from 198 incident head and neck cancerpatients (median years to cancer diagnosis = 6.6) and 924 matched control subjects using multiplex serology, and subsequently in serial samples (median = 5/individual). Available tumor samples were identified and tested for HPV16 RNA to define HPV-driven OPC. Results:HPV16-E6 antibodies were present at baseline in 42.3% of 52 OPC patients and 0.5% of 924 control subjects. HPV16-E6 antibody levels were highly elevated and stable across serial blood samples for 21 OPC patients who were seropositive at baseline, as well as for one OPC patient who seroconverted closer to diagnosis. All five subjects with HPV16-driven OPC tumors were HPV16-E6-seropositive, and the four subjects with HPV16-negative OPC tumors were seronegative. The estimated 10-year cumulative risk of OPC was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8% to 21.5%) for HPV16-E6-seropositive men, 1.3% (95% CI = 0.1% to 15.3%) for HPV16-E6-seropositive women, and 0.04% (95% CI = 0.03% to 0.06%) among HPV16-E6-seronegative individuals. Conclusions: Forty-two percent of subjects diagnosed with OPC between 1994 and 2009 in a US cohort were HPV16-E6 seropositive, with stable antibody levels during annual follow-up for up to 13 years prior to diagnosis. Tumor analysis indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of HPV16-E6 antibodies were exceptionally high in predicting HPV-driven OPC. Published by Oxford University Press 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Markus Schmitt; I G Bravo; Peter J F Snijders; Lutz Gissmann; Michael Pawlita; Tim Waterboer Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vikas Mehta; Paul Johnson; Andrew Tassler; Seungwon Kim; Robert L Ferris; Melonie Nance; Jonas T Johnson; Umamaheswar Duvvuri Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Gypsyamber D'Souza; Gwendolyn Clemens; Tanya Troy; Rachel G Castillo; Linda Struijk; Tim Waterboer; Noemi Bender; Phillip M Pierorazio; Simon R Best; Howard Strickler; Dorothy J Wiley; Robert I Haddad; Marshall Posner; Carole Fakhry Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2019-08-16
Authors: Krystle A Lang Kuhs; Aimée R Kreimer; Sumita Trivedi; Dana Holzinger; Michael Pawlita; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Sandra P Gibson; Nicole C Schmitt; Allan Hildesheim; Tim Waterboer; Robert L Ferris Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Samantha Lang; Sarah Schimansky; Rhona Beynon; Christopher Penfold; Amy Davies; Andrea Waylen; Steven Thomas; Miranda Pring; Michael Pawlita; Tim Waterboer; Andrew R Ness Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Krystle A Lang Kuhs; C Burton Wood; Jamie Wiggleton; Joseph M Aulino; Brian Latimer; Derek K Smith; Noemi Bender; Sarah Rohde; Kyle Mannion; Young Kim; Robert Sinard; Alexander Langerman; Arthur Fleischer; Carole Fakhry; Tim Waterboer; James L Netterville Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Till Piontek; Christoph Harmel; Michael Pawlita; Katrin Carow; Juliane Schröter; Ingo B Runnebaum; Matthias Dürst; Frederik Graw; Tim Waterboer Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Sanjana Balachandra; Samuel B Kusin; Rebecca Lee; James-Michael Blackwell; Jasmin A Tiro; Lindsay G Cowell; Cheng-Ming Chiang; Shwu-Yuan Wu; Sanskriti Varma; Erika L Rivera; Helen G Mayo; Lianghao Ding; Baran D Sumer; Jayanthi S Lea; Aditya Bagrodia; Linda M Farkas; Richard Wang; Carole Fakhry; Kristina R Dahlstrom; Erich M Sturgis; Andrew T Day Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mary Roz Timbang; Michael W Sim; Arnaud F Bewley; D Gregory Farwell; Avinash Mantravadi; Michael G Moore Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kristina R Dahlstrom; Karen S Anderson; Matthew S Field; Diego Chowell; Jing Ning; Nan Li; Qingyi Wei; Guojun Li; Erich M Sturgis Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: F Scasso; G Ferrari; G C DE Vincentiis; A Arosio; S Bottero; M Carretti; A Ciardo; S Cocuzza; A Colombo; B Conti; A Cordone; M DE Ciccio; E Delehaye; L Della Vecchia; I DE Macina; C Dentone; P DI Mauro; R Dorati; R Fazio; A Ferrari; G Ferrea; S Giannantonio; I Genta; M Giuliani; D Lucidi; L Maiolino; G Marini; P Marsella; D Meucci; T Modena; B Montemurri; A Odone; S Palma; M L Panatta; M Piemonte; P Pisani; S Pisani; L Prioglio; A Scorpecci; L Scotto DI Santillo; A Serra; C Signorelli; E Sitzia; M L Tropiano; M Trozzi; F M Tucci; L Vezzosi; B Viaggi Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.124