| Literature DB >> 28374869 |
M Gelardi1, L Iannuzzi1, M De Giosa2, S Taliente1, N De Candia1, N Quaranta1, E De Corso3, V Seccia4, G Ciprandi5.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a common inflammatory disorder that strongly impacts patients' quality of life. CRSwNP is still a challenge for ENT specialists due to its unknown pathogenesis, difficult control and frequent relapse. We tested the hypothesis that a new standardised therapeutic approach based on individual clinical-cytological grading (CCG), may improve control of the disease and prevent the needing for surgery. We analysed 204 patients suffering from bilateral CRSwNP, 145 patients of whom regularly assumed therapy, respecting the planned check-up, and were considered cases; 59 patients were not assuming therapy as indicated and were considered as controls. After five years of standardised treatment, 15 of 145 (10.5%) improved endoscopic staging, 61 of 145 (42%) did not change their endoscopic staging, and 69 of 145 (47.5%) were worse. In the control group, 49 of 59 (83%) were worse by at least two stages (p < 0.05). Patients and controls were stratified basing on clinical and cytological grading as mild, moderate and severe. After patient stratification, in the mild group (n = 27) 92% patients had a constant trend, with no worsening and no need for surgery over a 5-year period, whereas in the mild CCG control group 1 of 59 (1.6%) required surgery (p < 0.05). In moderate GCC (n = 83), 44% of patients did not modify or improve endoscopic staging and 3.6% needed surgery, compared to 13.6% of controls with moderate GCC (p < 0.05). In severe CCG (n = 35), even though no patients achieved significant amelioration of endoscopic grading, 40% of patients were considered as "clinically controlled" and 5.7% of patients underwent surgery, but the percentage was significantly higher (49%) in the control group significant (p = 0.0000). Finally, statistical analyses revealed a clear trend that polyp size increased at a faster rate in the control group than in the treatment group and for each subgroup (low, moderate and severe). The present study suggests a new approach in the management of CRS according to clinical cytological grading that allows defining the grade of CRSwNP severity and to adapt the intensity of treatment. This approach limited the use of systemic corticosteroids to only moderate-severe CRSwNP with a low corticosteroid dosage in comparison with those previously suggested. Our protocol seems to improve the adherence by patients, control of disease and the need for surgery in the long-term. © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical grading; Cytological grading; Nasal polyps; Treatment
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28374869 PMCID: PMC5384308 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-1417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ISSN: 0392-100X Impact factor: 2.124
Fig. 1.Prognostic index of nasal polyp relapse based on clinical and cytologic grading.
Fig. 2.Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for nasal polyposis.
Fig. 3.Flow chart of nasal polyp treatment on the basis of proposed grading.
5-year follow-up after treatment by endoscopic staging, stratifying results according to the clinical cytological grading.
| Improved | Not modified | Worsening | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | |
| GCC 1-3 | 9/27 | 0/15 | 16/27 (59.2%) | 2/15 | 2/27 | 13/15 |
| GCC 4-6 | 6/83 | 0/32 | 31/83 (37.34%) | 8/32 | 46/83 | 24/32 |
| GCC ≥7 | 0/35 | 0/12 | 14/35 (40%) | 0/12 | 21/35 | 12/12 |
| Totale | 15/145 | 0 | 61/145 | 10/59 | 69/145 | 49/59 |
p < 0.05
Fig. 4.Plot of the discretised polyp size for each subject, as a function of time, conditioned on group and subsample.
Fig. 5.Boxplot of the discretised polyp size for each subject, as a function of time, conditioned on group and subsample.
Parameter estimates, standard errors, z-statistics and p-values for each subsample.
| Parameter | Estimate | Std. Error | z-statistic | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | βtr | 3.910 | 0.814 | 4.803 | < 0.001 |
| βt/tr | 3.024 | 0.741 | 4.079 | < 0.001 | |
| B | βtr | 4.574 | 0.787 | 5.810 | < 0.001 |
| βt/tr | 2.184 | 0.545 | 4.009 | < 0.001 | |
| C | βtr | 3.511 | 0.875 | 4.012 | < 0.001 |
| βt/tr | 2.077 | 0.598 | 3.474 | < 0.001 |