Literature DB >> 28374524

Legacy introductions and climatic variation explain spatiotemporal patterns of invasive hybridization in a native trout.

Clint C Muhlfeld1,2, Ryan P Kovach1, Robert Al-Chokhachy3, Stephen J Amish2, Jeffrey L Kershner3, Robb F Leary4, Winsor H Lowe5, Gordon Luikart2, Phil Matson2, David A Schmetterling4, Bradley B Shepard6, Peter A H Westley7, Diane Whited2, Andrew Whiteley8, Fred W Allendorf5.   

Abstract

Hybridization between invasive and native species, a significant threat to worldwide biodiversity, is predicted to increase due to climate-induced expansions of invasive species. Long-term research and monitoring are crucial for understanding the ecological and evolutionary processes that modulate the effects of invasive species. Using a large, multidecade genetics dataset (N = 582 sites, 12,878 individuals) with high-resolution climate predictions and extensive stocking records, we evaluate the spatiotemporal dynamics of hybridization between native cutthroat trout and invasive rainbow trout, the world's most widely introduced invasive fish, across the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States. Historical effects of stocking and contemporary patterns of climatic variation were strongly related to the spread of hybridization across space and time. The probability of occurrence, extent of, and temporal changes in hybridization increased at sites in close proximity to historical stocking locations with greater rainbow trout propagule pressure, warmer water temperatures, and lower spring precipitation. Although locations with warmer water temperatures were more prone to hybridization, cold sites were not protected from invasion; 58% of hybridized sites had cold mean summer water temperatures (<11°C). Despite cessation of stocking over 40 years ago, hybridization increased over time at half (50%) of the locations with long-term data, the vast majority of which (74%) were initially nonhybridized, emphasizing the chronic, negative impacts of human-mediated hybridization. These results show that effects of climate change on biodiversity must be analyzed in the context of historical human impacts that set ecological and evolutionary trajectories.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; climate change; cutthroat trout; hybridization; introgression; invasion; propagule pressure; translocation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374524     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Variable hybridization outcomes in trout are predicted by historical fish stocking and environmental context.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mandeville; Annika W Walters; Brittany J Nordberg; Karly H Higgins; Jason C Burckhardt; Catherine E Wagner
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  The importance of warm habitat to the growth regime of cold-water fishes.

Authors:  Jonathan B Armstrong; Aimee H Fullerton; Chris E Jordan; Joseph L Ebersole; James R Bellmore; Ivan Arismendi; Brooke Penaluna; Gordon H Reeves
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Experimental crossbreeding reveals strain-specific variation in mortality, growth and personality in the brown trout (Salmo trutta).

Authors:  Anni Ågren; Anssi Vainikka; Matti Janhunen; Pekka Hyvärinen; Jorma Piironen; Raine Kortet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Multiple decades of stocking has resulted in limited hatchery introgression in wild brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations of Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Sarah J Lehnert; Shauna M Baillie; John MacMillan; Ian G Paterson; Colin F Buhariwalla; Ian R Bradbury; Paul Bentzen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Climate change and expanding invasive species drive widespread declines of native trout in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA.

Authors:  Donovan A Bell; Ryan P Kovach; Clint C Muhlfeld; Robert Al-Chokhachy; Timothy J Cline; Diane C Whited; David A Schmetterling; Paul M Lukacs; Andrew R Whiteley
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Population genomic monitoring provides insight into conservation status but no correlation with demographic estimates of extinction risk in a threatened trout.

Authors:  William Hemstrom; Daniel Dauwalter; Mary M Peacock; Douglas Leasure; Seth Wenger; Michael R Miller; Helen Neville
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 7.  Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; W Chris Funk; Om P Rajora
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.185

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.