Aslı Çiftçi1, Halis Ulaş2, Ahmet Topuzoğlu2, Zeliha Tunca3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Horasan State Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey. 3. Retired Lecturer, Department of Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: New evidence suggests that the efficacy of antidepressants occurs within the first weeks of treatment and this early response predicts the later response. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if the partial response in the first week predicts the response at the end of treatment in patients with major depressive disorder who are treated with either antidepressant medication or electroconvulsive therapy. METHODS: Inpatients from Dokuz Eylül University Hospital with a major depressive episode, treated with antidepressant medication (n=52) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (n=48), were recruited for the study. The data were retrospectively collected to decide whether a 25% decrease in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score at the first week of treatment predicts a 50% decrease at the third week using validity analysis. In addition, the effects of socio-demographic and clinical variables on the treatment response were assessed. RESULTS: A 25% decrease in the HDRS score in the first week of treatment predicted a 50% decrease in the HDRS score in the third week with a 78.3% positive predictive value, 62.1% negative predictive value, 62.1% sensitivity, and 78.3% specificity for antidepressant medications and an 88% positive predictive value, 52.2% negative predictive value, 66.7% sensitivity, and 80% specificity for ECT. The number of previous hospitalizations, comorbid medical illnesses, number of depressive episodes, duration of illness, and duration of the current episode were related to the treatment response. CONCLUSION: Treatment response in the first week predicted the response in the third week with a high specificity and a high positive predictive value. Close monitoring of the response from the first week of treatment may thus help the clinician to predict the subsequent response.
INTRODUCTION: New evidence suggests that the efficacy of antidepressants occurs within the first weeks of treatment and this early response predicts the later response. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if the partial response in the first week predicts the response at the end of treatment in patients with major depressive disorder who are treated with either antidepressant medication or electroconvulsive therapy. METHODS: Inpatients from Dokuz Eylül University Hospital with a major depressive episode, treated with antidepressant medication (n=52) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (n=48), were recruited for the study. The data were retrospectively collected to decide whether a 25% decrease in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score at the first week of treatment predicts a 50% decrease at the third week using validity analysis. In addition, the effects of socio-demographic and clinical variables on the treatment response were assessed. RESULTS: A 25% decrease in the HDRS score in the first week of treatment predicted a 50% decrease in the HDRS score in the third week with a 78.3% positive predictive value, 62.1% negative predictive value, 62.1% sensitivity, and 78.3% specificity for antidepressant medications and an 88% positive predictive value, 52.2% negative predictive value, 66.7% sensitivity, and 80% specificity for ECT. The number of previous hospitalizations, comorbid medical illnesses, number of depressive episodes, duration of illness, and duration of the current episode were related to the treatment response. CONCLUSION: Treatment response in the first week predicted the response in the third week with a high specificity and a high positive predictive value. Close monitoring of the response from the first week of treatment may thus help the clinician to predict the subsequent response.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antidepressant medications; electroconvulsive therapy; major depressive disorder; prediction; response
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jonathan W Stewart; Diane Warden; George Niederehe; Michael E Thase; Philip W Lavori; Barry D Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Harold A Sackeim; David J Kupfer; James Luther; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Bradley N Gaynes; Diane Warden; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Maurizio Fava; A John Rush Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Florian Seemüller; Michael Riedel; Michael Obermeier; Michael Bauer; Mazda Adli; Klaus Kronmüller; Florian Holsboer; Peter Brieger; Gerd Laux; Wolfram Bender; Isabella Heuser; Joachim Zeiler; Wolfgang Gaebel; Eva Dichgans; Roland Bottländer; Richard Musil; Hans-Jürgen Möller Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Raymond W Lam; Sidney H Kennedy; Sophie Grigoriadis; Roger S McIntyre; Roumen Milev; Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Sagar V Parikh; Scott B Patten; Arun V Ravindran Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Martin M Katz; Janet L Tekell; Charles L Bowden; Steve Brannan; John P Houston; Nancy Berman; Alan Frazer Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Paul B Hicks; Varadan Sevilimedu; Gary R Johnson; Ilanit Tal; Peijun Chen; Lori L Davis; Julia E Vertrees; Somaia Mohamed; Sidney Zisook Journal: Psychiatr Res Clin Pract Date: 2019-10-03
Authors: Nele Van de Velde; Mitchel Kappen; Ernst H W Koster; Kristof Hoorelbeke; Hannelore Tandt; Pieter Verslype; Chris Baeken; Rudi De Raedt; Gilbert Lemmens; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.630