| Literature DB >> 28373705 |
Deepa Suhag1, Arun Kumar Sharma2, Satyendra K Rajput2, Gajender Saini3, Sandip Chakrabarti4, Monalisa Mukherjee5.
Abstract
This work reports first electrochemical preparation of exceEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28373705 PMCID: PMC5428811 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00616-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Electrochemical synthesis of eNGS, and (b) Irreversible electrochemical reduction of eNGS in PBS (pH 4.5/saturated with N2 gas). Scan rate - 20 mV/s.
Figure 2(a) Surface topographies of eNGS by HRTEM (yellow circles highlight the wrinkled and folded areas in the sheets) (b,c) SAED patterns of eNGS and (d) X-ray diffraction patterns of eNGS, NGS, and CNS.
Figure 3(a) FTIR of CNS and eNGS (b) Raman spectra (514.5 nm) of CNS and eNGS.
Figure 4(a) C1s spectra of CNS, (b) C1s spectra of eNGS, and (c) Survey XPS spectra of CNS and eNGS.
Figure 5TGA of CNS and eNGS under N2 atmosphere.
Figure 6Bare Pt-, Pt-/CNS, and Pt-/eNGS in 100 µM DA (in 0.1 M PBS/pH 7.4) in the presence of interferences (150 µM AA and UA) at 50 mV/s.
Figure 7Effect of eNGS (300 mg/Kg/p.o, once) on glutathione concentration (μ mol/g wt. of tissue) against normal control rats. (a) glutathione concentration of brain, (b) glutathione concentration of heart, (c) glutathione concentration of kidney, (d) glutathione concentration of liver. Each group contain n = 3 rats and all values were represented as mean ± SD. Value of ‘p’ less than 0.05 has been considered as statistically significant.
Figure 8Histological sections of brain (a-Control, b-eNGS), (c-Control, d-eNGS) heart, (e-Control, f-eNGS) kidney, and (g-Control, h-eNGS) liver from each group. Photomicrographs of each tissue of normal control and eNGS rats were taken at 400x.