Literature DB >> 28373270

Patient-Provider Communication and Health Outcomes Among Individuals With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2010 to 2013.

Victor Okunrintemi1, Erica S Spatz1, Paul Di Capua1, Joseph A Salami1, Javier Valero-Elizondo1, Haider Warraich1, Salim S Virani1, Michael J Blaha1, Ron Blankstein1, Adeel A Butt1, William B Borden1, Kumar Dharmarajan1, Henry Ting1, Harlan M Krumholz1, Khurram Nasir2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consumer-reported patient-provider communication (PPC) assessed by Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey in ambulatory settings is incorporated as a complementary value metric for patient-centered care of chronic conditions in pay-for-performance programs. In this study, we examine the relationship of PPC with select indicators of patient-centered care in a nationally representative US adult population with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study population consisted of a nationally representative sample of 6810 individuals (aged ≥18 years), representing 18.3 million adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (self-reported or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition diagnosis) reporting a usual source of care in the 2010 to 2013 pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey cohort. Participants responded to questions from Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey that assessed PPC, and we developed a weighted PPC composite score using their responses, categorized as 1 (poor), 2 (average), and 3 (optimal). Outcomes of interest were (1) patient-reported outcomes: 12-item Short Form physical/mental health status, (2) quality of care measures: statin and ASA use, (3) healthcare resource utilization: emergency room visits and hospital stays, and (4) total annual and out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease patients reporting poor versus optimal were over 2-fold more likely to report poor outcomes; 52% and 26% more likely to report that they are not on statin and aspirin, respectively, had a significantly greater utilization of health resources (odds ratio≥2 emergency room visit, 1.41 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.81]; odds ratio≥2 hospitalization, 1.36 [95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.79]), as well as an estimated $1243 ($127-$2359) higher annual healthcare expenditure.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a strong relationship between PPC and patient-reported outcomes, utilization of evidence-based therapies, healthcare resource utilization, and expenditures among those with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Heart Association; adult; cardiovascular diseases; health status; patient-centered care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28373270     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  18 in total

1.  Association of Depression Risk with Patient Experience, Healthcare Expenditure, and Health Resource Utilization Among Adults with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Victor Okunrintemi; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Erin D Michos; Joseph A Salami; Oluseye Ogunmoroti; Chukwuemeka Osondu; Martin Tibuakuu; Eve-Marie Benson; Timothy M Pawlik; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Empowering Patients during Hospitalization: Perspectives on Inpatient Portal Use.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Naleef Fareed; Alice Gaughan; Sarah R MacEwan; Jaclyn Volney; Cynthia J Sieck
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Association of Income Disparities with Patient-Reported Healthcare Experience.

Authors:  Victor Okunrintemi; Rohan Khera; Erica S Spatz; Joseph A Salami; Javier Valero-Elizondo; Haider J Warraich; Salim S Virani; Ron Blankstein; Michael J Blaha; Timothy M Pawlik; Kumar Dharmarajan; Harlan M Krumholz; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Racial/ethnic disparities in patient experiences with care and Gleason score at diagnosis of prostate cancer: a SEER-CAHPS study.

Authors:  Stephanie Navarro; Xiaohui Hu; Aaron Mejia; Carol Y Ochoa; Trevor A Pickering; Leslie Ballas; Albert J Farias
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Association of mental health outcomes and lower patient satisfaction among adults with alopecia: A cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Anne B Kim; Brian T Cheng; Shahzeb Hassan
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  General Health Care Utilization Among Nonelderly Cancer Survivors Before and After Affordable Care Act Implementation: Early Results.

Authors:  Amy L Shaver; Ying Cao; Katia Noyes
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-02-18

7.  Association Between the Mental Health of Patients With Psoriasis and Their Satisfaction With Physicians.

Authors:  Charlotte Read; April W Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  Personalization of Conversational Agent-Patient Interaction Styles for Chronic Disease Management: Two Consecutive Cross-sectional Questionnaire Studies.

Authors:  Christoph Gross; Theresa Schachner; Andrea Hasl; Dario Kohlbrenner; Christian F Clarenbach; Forian V Wangenheim; Tobias Kowatsch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Emergency Department Visits and Subsequent Hospital Admission Trends for Patients with Chest Pain and a History of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Christine Eichelberger; Aarti Patel; Zhijie Ding; Christopher D Pericone; Jennifer H Lin; Christopher W Baugh
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2020-03-02

10.  Perceived Patient-Provider Communication Quality and Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Watching Health-Related Videos on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Aisha Langford; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.