Literature DB >> 28372072

Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.

Hongmei Hu1, Stephan D Ewert1, David McAlpine2, Mathias Dietz1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that normal-hearing (NH) listeners' spatial perception of non-stationary interaural time differences (ITDs) is dominated by the carrier ITD during rising amplitude segments. Here, ITD sensitivity throughout the amplitude-modulation cycle in NH listeners and bilateral cochlear implant (CI) subjects is compared, the latter by means of direct stimulation of a single electrode pair. The data indicate that, while NH listeners are most sensitive to ITDs applied toward the beginning of a modulation cycle at 600 Hz, NH listeners at 200 Hz and especially bilateral CI subjects at 200 pulses per second (pps) are more sensitive to ITDs applied to the modulation maximum. This has implications for spatial-hearing in complex environments: NH listeners' dominant 600-Hz ITD information from the rising amplitude segments comprises direct sound information. The 200-pps low rate required to get ITD sensitivity in CI users results in a higher weight of pulses later in the modulation cycle where the source ITDs are more likely corrupted by reflections. This indirectly indicates that even if future binaural CI processors are able to provide perceptually exploitable ITD information, CI users will likely not get the full benefit from such pulse-based ITD cues in reverberant and other complex environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28372072     DOI: 10.1121/1.4977014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Chantal van Ginkel; René H Gifford; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectro-temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Adrian Y Cho; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal Envelope Coding by Inferior Colliculus Neurons with Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Martin F McKinney; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-17

4.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. V. Modulated noise carriers.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Mixed stimulation rates to improve sensitivity of interaural timing differences in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Improving Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity Using Short Inter-pulse Intervals with Amplitude-Modulated Pulse Trains in Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Sridhar Srinivasan; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Christoph Arnoldner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-10

8.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  High-resolution temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.