Literature DB >> 28370489

Volumetric changes and peri-implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone, a retrospective case-control study with a 5-year follow-up.

Stefan P Bienz1, Ronald E Jung1, Vitor M Sapata1, Christoph H F Hämmerle1, Jürg Hüsler1, Daniel S Thoma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the volumetric changes and peri-implant health at implant sites with and without previous soft tissue grafting over a 5-year observation period.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 18 partially edentulous patients, dental implants were placed in the esthetic zone (15-25) with simultaneous guided bone regeneration, followed by submerged healing. During the healing phase, eight patients (test) received a subepithelial connective tissue graft, whereas 10 patients (control) did not receive any soft tissue augmentation. Subsequently, abutment connection was performed and final reconstructions were inserted. Impressions were taken 1 week after crown insertion and at 5 years. Obtained casts were scanned and superimposed for volumetric and linear measurements. The mean distance (MD) in the mid-buccal area between the two surfaces and the differences in buccal marginal mucosal level (bMMLchange ) and in ridge width (RWchange ) were evaluated. Peri-implant health was assessed using probing pocket depth (PPD) values, plaque index (PlI) and bleeding on probing (BOP).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 60.5 months a median MD of -0.38 mm (Min: -0.94; Max: -0.03) (test) and of -0.51 mm (Min: -0.76; Max: 0.05) (control) was calculated. The level of the margo mucosae (bMMLchange ) demonstrated a median loss of -0.42 mm (Min: -1.1; Max: -0.01) (test) and of -0.33 mm (Min: -1.02; Max: 0.00) (control). The median RWchange ranged between -0.44 mm and -0.73 mm (test) and between -0.49 mm and -0.54 mm (control). Mean PPD values slightly increased, whereas PlI and BOP remained stable over time in both groups. None of the comparisons between the groups revealed statistically significant differences (P > 0.35). A small sample size must be considered, however.
CONCLUSIONS: Limited by a retrospective case-control study design, implant sites with and without soft tissue grafting on the buccal side revealed only minimal volumetric and linear changes and stability of peri-implant parameters over 5 years.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implants; fixed partial denture; subepithelial connective tissue graft; volume stability; volumetric analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28370489     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Design of customized soft-tissue substitutes for posterior single-tooth defects: A proof-of-concept in-vitro study.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Tao Yu; Malin Strasding; Xinran Liu; Felix Burkhardt; Birgit Schäfer; Irena Sailer; Dobrila Nesic
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 5.021

2.  Primary bone augmentation leads to equally stable marginal tissue conditions comparing the use of xenograft blocks infused with BMP-2 and autogenous bone blocks: A 3D analysis after 3 years.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Michael Payer; Jenni Hjerppe; Jürg Hüsler; Norbert Jakse; Patrick R Schmidlin; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.021

3.  Tissue integration and biodegradation of soft tissue substitutes with and without compression: an experimental study in the rat.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Cedryck Vaquette; Alexis Ioannidis; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Sašo Ivanovski; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Baseline selection for evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue changes: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Chaoling Zheng; Shimin Wang; Hongqiang Ye; Yunsong Liu; Wenjie Hu; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

5.  Soft tissue phenotype modification impacts on peri-implant stability: a comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Cho-Ying Lin; Pe-Yi Kuo; Meng-Yao Chiu; Zhao-Zhao Chen; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Tissue Response to a Porous Collagen Matrix Used for Soft Tissue Augmentation.

Authors:  Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Sophia Zhang; Luca Ferrantino; Massimo Simion; Vivianne Chappuis; Dieter D Bosshardt
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  The influence of soft-tissue volume grafting on the maintenance of peri-implant tissue health and stability.

Authors:  Puria Parvini; Frank Schwarz; Karina Obreja; Ausra Ramanauskaite; Amira Begic; Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-02-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.