Literature DB >> 36255492

Tissue integration and biodegradation of soft tissue substitutes with and without compression: an experimental study in the rat.

Stefan P Bienz1, Cedryck Vaquette2, Alexis Ioannidis3, Christoph H F Hämmerle3, Ronald E Jung3, Sašo Ivanovski2, Daniel S Thoma3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the influence of compression on tissue integration and degradation of soft tissue substitutes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six subcutaneous pouches in twenty-eight rats were prepared and boxes made of Al2O3 were implanted and used as carriers for soft tissue substitutes: a collagen matrix (MG), two volume-stable collagen matrices (FG/MGA), and a polycaprolactone scaffold(E). The volume-stable materials (FG/MGA/E) were further implanted with a twofold (2) and a fourfold (4) compression, created by the stacking of additional layers of the substitute materials. The samples were retrieved at 1, 2, and 12 weeks (10 groups, 3 time points, n = 5 per time point and group, overall, 150 samples). The area fraction of infiltrated fibroblasts and inflammatory cells was evaluated histologically. Due to within-subject comparisons, mixed models were conducted for the primary outcome. The level of significance was set at 5%.
RESULTS: The area fraction of fibroblasts increased in all groups over time. At 12 weeks, the densely compressed materials FG4 (1.1%), MGA4 (1.7%), and MGA2 (2.5%) obtained lower values as compared to the other groups, ranging between 4.7 (E2) and 6.5% (MG). Statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed between groups FG4 vs MG/FG2/E/E4 as well as between MGA4 vs MG/FG2/E/E4 and E vs MGA2.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of compression led to delayed tissue integration. The effect of different compression levels was more distinct when compared to the differences between the materials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All biomaterials demonstrated tissue integration and a minimal concomitant inflammatory reaction. Clinically, it might be more favorable to obtain a sufficient flap release or to reduce the material size to improve the tissue integration processes.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histology; Histomorphometry; Soft tissue augmentation; Soft tissue substitutes

Year:  2022        PMID: 36255492     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04726-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.606


  36 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft® ) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Christian M Schmitt; Tobias Moest; Rainer Lutz; Falk Wehrhan; Friedrich W Neukam; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Soft tissue augmentation at immediate implants using a novel xenogeneic collagen matrix in conjunction with immediate provisional restorations: A prospective case series.

Authors:  Ignacio Sanz-Martín; Carolina Encalada; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Javier Aracil; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.932

3.  Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

Authors:  Dimitris N Tatakis; Leandro Chambrone; Edward P Allen; Burton Langer; Michael K McGuire; Christopher R Richardson; Ion Zabalegui; Homayoun H Zadeh
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Free gingival grafts.

Authors:  J M Nabers
Journal:  Periodontics       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health.

Authors:  William V Giannobile; Ronald E Jung; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  The subepithelial connective tissue graft.

Authors:  B Langer; L Calagna
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Ramón Lorenzo; Virginia García; Marco Orsini; Conchita Martin; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites.

Authors:  Daniel S Thoma; Marco Zeltner; Monika Hilbe; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Jürg Hüsler; Ronald E Jung
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 9.  Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel S Thoma; Borvornwut Buranawat; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ulrike Held; Ronald E Jung
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession: Randomized trial assessing non-inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Maurizio S Tonetti; Pierpaolo Cortellini; Gaia Pellegrini; Michele Nieri; Daniele Bonaccini; Mario Allegri; Philippe Bouchard; Francesco Cairo; Gianpaolo Conforti; Ioannis Fourmousis; Filippo Graziani; Adrian Guerrero; Jan Halben; Jacques Malet; Giulio Rasperini; Heinz Topoll; Hannes Wachtel; Beat Wallkamm; Ion Zabalegui; Otto Zuhr
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 8.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.