BACKGROUND: Preoperative nutritional status has an impact on patients' clinical outcome. For pancreatic surgery, however, it is unclear which nutritional assessment scores adequately assess malnutrition associated with postoperative outcome. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective pancreatic surgery at the University of Heidelberg were screened for eligibility. Twelve nutritional assessment scores were calculated before operation, and patients were categorized as either at risk or not at risk for malnutrition by each score. The postoperative course was monitored prospectively by assessors blinded to the nutritional status. The primary endpoint was major complications evaluated for each score in a multivariable analysis corrected for known risk factors in pancreatic surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 279 patients were analysed. A major complication occurred in 61 patients (21·9 per cent). The proportion of malnourished patients differed greatly among the scores, from 1·1 per cent (Nutritional Risk Index) to 79·6 per cent (Nutritional Risk Classification). In the multivariable analysis, only raised amylase level in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1 (odds ratio (OR) 4·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·10 to 21·84; P = 0·037) and age (OR 1·05, 1·02 to 1·09; P = 0·005) were significantly associated with major complications; none of the scores was associated with, or predicted, postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: None of the nutritional assessment scores defined malnutrition relevant to complications after pancreatic surgery and these scores may thus be abandoned.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative nutritional status has an impact on patients' clinical outcome. For pancreatic surgery, however, it is unclear which nutritional assessment scores adequately assess malnutrition associated with postoperative outcome. METHODS:Patients scheduled for elective pancreatic surgery at the University of Heidelberg were screened for eligibility. Twelve nutritional assessment scores were calculated before operation, and patients were categorized as either at risk or not at risk for malnutrition by each score. The postoperative course was monitored prospectively by assessors blinded to the nutritional status. The primary endpoint was major complications evaluated for each score in a multivariable analysis corrected for known risk factors in pancreatic surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 279 patients were analysed. A major complication occurred in 61 patients (21·9 per cent). The proportion of malnourished patients differed greatly among the scores, from 1·1 per cent (Nutritional Risk Index) to 79·6 per cent (Nutritional Risk Classification). In the multivariable analysis, only raised amylase level in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1 (odds ratio (OR) 4·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·10 to 21·84; P = 0·037) and age (OR 1·05, 1·02 to 1·09; P = 0·005) were significantly associated with major complications; none of the scores was associated with, or predicted, postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: None of the nutritional assessment scores defined malnutrition relevant to complications after pancreatic surgery and these scores may thus be abandoned.
Authors: Pascal Probst; Juri Fuchs; Michael R Schön; Georgios Polychronidis; Christos Stravodimos; Arianeb Mehrabi; Markus K Diener; Philipp Knebel; Markus W Büchler; Katrin Hoffmann Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 7.293
Authors: Shengnan Zhou; Zhangping Yu; Xiaodong Shi; Huaiyu Zhao; Menghua Dai; Wei Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Joerg Kaiser; Willem Niesen; Pascal Probst; Thomas Bruckner; Colette Doerr-Harim; Oliver Strobel; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert Journal: Trials Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Rosa Klotz; Svenja E Seide; Phillip Knebel; Pascal Probst; Thomas Bruckner; Johann Motsch; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Dittmar Böckler; Jan Larmann; Markus K Diener; Markus A Weigand; Markus W Büchler; Andre L Mihaljevic Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240