Literature DB >> 28369809

Prospective trial to evaluate the prognostic value of different nutritional assessment scores in pancreatic surgery (NURIMAS Pancreas).

P Probst1, S Haller1, T Bruckner2, A Ulrich1, O Strobel1, T Hackert1, M K Diener1, M W Büchler1, P Knebel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative nutritional status has an impact on patients' clinical outcome. For pancreatic surgery, however, it is unclear which nutritional assessment scores adequately assess malnutrition associated with postoperative outcome.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective pancreatic surgery at the University of Heidelberg were screened for eligibility. Twelve nutritional assessment scores were calculated before operation, and patients were categorized as either at risk or not at risk for malnutrition by each score. The postoperative course was monitored prospectively by assessors blinded to the nutritional status. The primary endpoint was major complications evaluated for each score in a multivariable analysis corrected for known risk factors in pancreatic surgery.
RESULTS: Overall, 279 patients were analysed. A major complication occurred in 61 patients (21·9 per cent). The proportion of malnourished patients differed greatly among the scores, from 1·1 per cent (Nutritional Risk Index) to 79·6 per cent (Nutritional Risk Classification). In the multivariable analysis, only raised amylase level in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1 (odds ratio (OR) 4·91, 95 per cent c.i. 1·10 to 21·84; P = 0·037) and age (OR 1·05, 1·02 to 1·09; P = 0·005) were significantly associated with major complications; none of the scores was associated with, or predicted, postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: None of the nutritional assessment scores defined malnutrition relevant to complications after pancreatic surgery and these scores may thus be abandoned.
© 2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28369809     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Intensive perioperative rehabilitation improves surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yuji Kitahata; Seiko Hirono; Manabu Kawai; Ken-Ichi Okada; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Ryouhei Kobayashi; Masaki Ueno; Shinya Hayami; Toshio Shimokawa; Ken Kouda; Fumihiro Tajima; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Risk in Patients Who Undergo Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ilaria Trestini; Salvatore Paiella; Claudio Bassi; Michele Milella; Marta Sandini; Isabella Sperduti; Giovanni Elio; Tommaso Pollini; Davide Melisi; Alessandra Auriemma; Caterina Soldà; Clelia Bonaiuto; Daniela Tregnago; Alice Avancini; Erica Secchettin; Deborah Bonamini; Massimo Lanza; Sara Pilotto; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Chiara Bovo; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer patients: assessments and interventions for the pancreatic surgeon.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Caitlin E Jones; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2019-03-11

4.  Prospective study to evaluate the prognostic value of different nutritional assessment scores in liver surgery: NURIMAS Liver (DRKS00006340).

Authors:  Pascal Probst; Juri Fuchs; Michael R Schön; Georgios Polychronidis; Christos Stravodimos; Arianeb Mehrabi; Markus K Diener; Philipp Knebel; Markus W Büchler; Katrin Hoffmann
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  The Relationship between Phase Angle, Nutrition Status, and Complications in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer.

Authors:  Shengnan Zhou; Zhangping Yu; Xiaodong Shi; Huaiyu Zhao; Menghua Dai; Wei Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Early postoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is associated with complication III-V after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study of 1,334 patients.

Authors:  Lei Li; Chang Liu; Jiayin Yang; Hong Wu; Tianfu Wen; Wentao Wang; Bo Li; Lvnan Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Abdominal drainage versus no drainage after distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joerg Kaiser; Willem Niesen; Pascal Probst; Thomas Bruckner; Colette Doerr-Harim; Oliver Strobel; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Preoperative Nutrition Support May Reduce the Prevalence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with High Nutritional Risk Determined by NRS2002.

Authors:  Jing-Yong Xu; Xiao-Dong Tian; Jing-Hai Song; Jian Chen; Yin-Mo Yang; Jun-Min Wei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Comparison of preoperative Nutritional Risk Index and Body Mass Index for predicting immediate postoperative outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: Cohort-study.

Authors:  Nabin Pokharel; Gaurav Katwal; Subodh Kumar Adhikari
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-15

10.  Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions - a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023).

Authors:  Rosa Klotz; Svenja E Seide; Phillip Knebel; Pascal Probst; Thomas Bruckner; Johann Motsch; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Dittmar Böckler; Jan Larmann; Markus K Diener; Markus A Weigand; Markus W Büchler; Andre L Mihaljevic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.