Andrew B Cohen1, M Tish Knobf2, Terri R Fried1,3. 1. Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Division of Acute Care/Health Systems, Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine how do-not-hospitalize (DNH) orders are interpreted and used in nursing homes (NHs) once they are in place. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews performed from December 2013 to April 2014. SETTING: Eight skilled nursing facilities in Connecticut that ranked in the top 10% or bottom 10% in hospitalization rates from 2008 to 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing facility staff members (N = 31). MEASUREMENTS: A multidisciplinary team performed qualitative content analysis. The constant comparative method was used to develop a coding structure and identify themes. RESULTS: DNH orders were uncommon at low- and high-hospitalizing facilities. Participants reported that they did not interpret these orders literally. A DNH order was not a prohibition against hospitalization but was understood to have a variety of exceptions. These orders functioned primarily as a signal that hospitalization should be questioned and discussed with the family when an acute event occurred. CONCLUSION: In-the-moment discussions about hospitalization are still necessary even when a DNH order is in place. Work to reduce potentially burdensome NH-hospital transfers needs to focus not just on eliciting preferences in advance, but also on preparing residents and their families to make the best decisions about hospitalization when the time comes.
OBJECTIVES: To determine how do-not-hospitalize (DNH) orders are interpreted and used in nursing homes (NHs) once they are in place. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews performed from December 2013 to April 2014. SETTING: Eight skilled nursing facilities in Connecticut that ranked in the top 10% or bottom 10% in hospitalization rates from 2008 to 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing facility staff members (N = 31). MEASUREMENTS: A multidisciplinary team performed qualitative content analysis. The constant comparative method was used to develop a coding structure and identify themes. RESULTS: DNH orders were uncommon at low- and high-hospitalizing facilities. Participants reported that they did not interpret these orders literally. A DNH order was not a prohibition against hospitalization but was understood to have a variety of exceptions. These orders functioned primarily as a signal that hospitalization should be questioned and discussed with the family when an acute event occurred. CONCLUSION: In-the-moment discussions about hospitalization are still necessary even when a DNH order is in place. Work to reduce potentially burdensome NH-hospital transfers needs to focus not just on eliciting preferences in advance, but also on preparing residents and their families to make the best decisions about hospitalization when the time comes.
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Christine A Nelson; Alvin H Moss; Susan W Tolle; Nancy A Perrin; Bernard J Hammes Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-10-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Natalie C Ernecoff; Sheryl Zimmerman; Susan L Mitchell; Mi-Kyung Song; Feng-Chang Lin; Kathryn L Wessell; Laura C Hanson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Matthew F Griffith; Cari R Levy; Toral J Parikh; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Leslie B Eber; Sing-I T Palat; Pedro L Gozalo; Joan M Teno Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Alexandra Pulst; Alexander Maximilian Fassmer; Falk Hoffmann; Guido Schmiemann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sabine E Lemoyne; Hanne H Herbots; Dennis De Blick; Roy Remmen; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Peter Van Bogaert Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Anke Strautmann; Katharina Allers; Alexander Maximilian Fassmer; Falk Hoffmann Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.234