Literature DB >> 28369414

The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Registry of Transvenous Lead Extraction Outcomes.

Maria Grazia Bongiorni1, Charles Kennergren2, Christian Butter3, Jean Claude Deharo4, Andrzej Kutarski5, Christopher A Rinaldi6, Simone L Romano1, Aldo P Maggioni7,8, Maryna Andarala7, Angelo Auricchio9, Karl-Heinz Kuck10, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist11.   

Abstract

AIMS: The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled Registry (ELECTRa), is a prospective registry of consecutive transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) in order to identify the safety and efficacy of the current practice of TLE. METHODS AND
RESULTS: European centres performing TLE, invited by the organizing committee on behalf of EHRA, prospectively recruited all consecutive patients undergoing TLE at their institution. The primary endpoint was TLE safety defined by pre-discharge major procedure-related complications including death. Secondary endpoints included clinical and radiological success and overall complication rates. Outcomes were compared between Low Volume (LoV) vs. High Volume (HiV) centers (LoV < 30 and HiV ≥ 30 procedures/year). A total of 3555 consecutive patients (pts) of whom 3510 underwent TLE at 73 centres in 19 European countries were enrolled between November 2012 and May 2014. The primary endpoint of in-hospital procedure-related major complication rate was 1.7% [95% CI 1.3-2.1%] (58/3510 pts) including a mortality of 0.5% [95% CI 0.3-0.8%] (17/3510 pts). Approximately two-thirds (37/58) of these complications occurred during the procedure and one-third (21/58) in the post-operative period. The most common procedure related complications were those requiring pericardiocentesis or chest tube and/or surgical repair (1.4% [95% CI 1.0-1.8%]). Complete clinical and radiological success rates were 96.7% [95% CI 96.1-97.3%] and 95.7% [95% CI 95.2-96.2%], respectively. The all cause in-hospital major complications and deaths were significantly lower in HiV centres vs. LoV centres (2.4% [95% CI 1.9-3.0%] vs. 4.1% [95% CI 2.7-6.0%], P = 0.0146; and 1.2% [95% CI 0.8-1.6%] vs. 2.5% [95% CI 1.5-4.1%] P = 0.0088), although those related to the procedure did not reach statistical significance. Radiological and clinical successes were more frequent in HiV vs. LoV centres.
CONCLUSION: The ELECTRa study is the largest prospective registry on TLE and confirmed the safety and efficacy of the current practice of TLE. Lead extraction was associated with a higher success rate with lower all cause complication and mortality rates in high volume compared with low volume centres. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multicentre registry; Transvenous lead extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28369414     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  63 in total

Review 1.  Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adryan A Perez; Frank W Woo; Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pacemaker-Associated Infection.

Authors:  Michael Döring; Sergio Richter; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Unmissable Papers, 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-03

4.  Key Lessons from the ELECTRa Registry in the Modern Era of Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Angelo Auricchio; François Regoli; Giulio Conte; Maria Luce Caputo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-08

5.  New-onset pericardial effusion during transvenous lead extraction: incidence, causative mechanisms, and associated factors.

Authors:  François Regoli; Gabriele D'Ambrosio; Maria Luce Caputo; Stefano Svab; Giulio Conte; Tiziano Moccetti; Catherine Klersy; Tiziano Cassina; Stefanos Demertzis; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Experience of cardiac implantable electronic device lead removal from a South African tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Philasande Mkoko; Nicholus Xolani Mdakane; Glenda Govender; Jacques Scherman; Ashley Chin
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.167

7.  Effectiveness and Safety of Transvenous Removal of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Leads in the Real Clinical Scenario.

Authors:  Roberto Costa; Katia Regina da Silva; Elizabeth Sartori Crevelari; Wagner Tadeu Jurevicius Nascimento; Marcia Mitie Nagumo; Martino Martinelli Filho; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Performance and outcomes of transvenous rotational lead extraction: Results from a prospective, monitored, global clinical study-"An evolution in extraction".

Authors:  Kunal Shah; Travis Pollema; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-03-19

9.  Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in the Chinese octogenarian patients.

Authors:  Xu Zhou; Feng Ze; Xuebin Li; Bin Wang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Transvenous lead extraction on continued oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Haran Burri
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.