Literature DB >> 28369273

Computational health economics for identification of unprofitable health care enrollees.

Sherri Rose1, Savannah L Bergquist1, Timothy J Layton1.   

Abstract

Health insurers may attempt to design their health plans to attract profitable enrollees while deterring unprofitable ones. Such insurers would not be delivering socially efficient levels of care by providing health plans that maximize societal benefit, but rather intentionally distorting plan benefits to avoid high-cost enrollees, potentially to the detriment of health and efficiency. In this work, we focus on a specific component of health plan design at risk for health insurer distortion in the Health Insurance Marketplaces: the prescription drug formulary. We introduce an ensembled machine learning function to determine whether drug utilization variables are predictive of a new measure of enrollee unprofitability we derive, and thus vulnerable to distortions by insurers. Our implementation also contains a unique application-specific variable selection tool. This study demonstrates that super learning is effective in extracting the relevant signal for this prediction problem, and that a small number of drug variables can be used to identify unprofitable enrollees. The results are both encouraging and concerning. While risk adjustment appears to have been reasonably successful at weakening the relationship between therapeutic-class-specific drug utilization and unprofitability, some classes remain predictive of insurer losses. The vulnerable enrollees whose prescription drug regimens include drugs in these classes may need special protection from regulators in health insurance market design.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification and prediction; Ensembles; Machine learning; Statistical methods in health economics; Variable selection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28369273      PMCID: PMC5862318          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  12 in total

1.  Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.

Authors:  R G Frank; J Glazer; T G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The HHS-HCC risk adjustment model for individual and small group markets under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  John Kautter; Gregory C Pope; Melvin Ingber; Sara Freeman; Lindsey Patterson; Michael Cohen; Patricia Keenan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-05-09

Review 3.  Describing, explaining or predicting mental health care costs: a guide to regression models. Methodological review.

Authors:  Graham Dunn; Massimo Mirandola; Francesco Amaddeo; Michele Tansella
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 4.  Predicting costs of mental health care: a critical literature review.

Authors:  Julia Jones; Francesco Amaddeo; Corrado Barbui; Michele Tansella
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 5.  Risk-adjusting outcomes of mental health and substance-related care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard C Hermann; Caitlin K Rollins; Jeffrey A Chan
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

7.  A Machine Learning Framework for Plan Payment Risk Adjustment.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  How well can post-traumatic stress disorder be predicted from pre-trauma risk factors? An exploratory study in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Sherri Rose; Karestan C Koenen; Elie G Karam; Paul E Stang; Dan J Stein; Steven G Heeringa; Eric D Hill; Israel Liberzon; Katie A McLaughlin; Samuel A McLean; Beth E Pennell; Maria Petukhova; Anthony J Rosellini; Ayelet M Ruscio; Victoria Shahly; Arieh Y Shalev; Derrick Silove; Alan M Zaslavsky; Matthias C Angermeyer; Evelyn J Bromet; José Miguel Caldas de Almeida; Giovanni de Girolamo; Peter de Jonge; Koen Demyttenaere; Silvia E Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Hristo Hinkov; Norito Kawakami; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Sing Lee; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Samuel D Murphy; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Marina Piazza; Jose Posada-Villa; Kate Scott; Yolanda Torres; Maria Carmen Viana
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 49.548

9.  Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study.

Authors:  Romain Pirracchio; Maya L Petersen; Marco Carone; Matthieu Resche Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Matching and Imputation Methods for Risk Adjustment in the Health Insurance Marketplaces.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Julie Shi; Thomas G McGuire; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2015-08-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Sample Selection for Medicare Risk Adjustment Due to Systematically Missing Data.

Authors:  Savannah L Bergquist; Thomas G McGuire; Timothy J Layton; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Mental Health Risk Adjustment with Clinical Categories and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Akritee Shrestha; Savannah Bergquist; Ellen Montz; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Estimating treatment effects with machine learning.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Stephan Lindner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Ana C Puhl; Kimberley M Zorn; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Jennifer J Klein; Anthony J Hickey; Alex M Clark
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Improving the Performance of Risk Adjustment Systems: Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Anna L Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Identifying undercompensated groups defined by multiple attributes in risk adjustment.

Authors:  Anna Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-09

7.  Classifying Stage IV Lung Cancer From Health Care Claims: A Comparison of Multiple Analytic Approaches.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brooks; Savannah L Bergquist; Mary Beth Landrum; Sherri Rose; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-05

8.  Fair regression for health care spending.

Authors:  Anna Zink; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.196

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.