Literature DB >> 28368706

Resting Physiological Correlates of Reduced Exercise Capacity in Smokers with Mild Airway Obstruction.

Amany F Elbehairy1,2, Azmy Faisal3,4, Jordan A Guenette5, Dennis Jensen6, Katherine A Webb1, Rashid Ahmed7, J Alberto Neder1, Denis E O'Donnell1.   

Abstract

Smokers with minor spirometric abnormalities can experience persistent activity-related dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Additional resting tests can expose heterogeneous physiological abnormalities, but their relevance and association with clinical outcomes remain uncertain. Subjects included sixty-two smokers (≥20 pack-years), with cough and/or dyspnea and minor airway obstruction [forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1) ≥80% predicted and >5th percentile lower limit of normal (LLN) (i.e., z-score >-1.64) using the 2012-Global Lung Function Initiative equations]. They underwent spirometry, plethysmography, oscillometry, single-breath nitrogen washout, and symptom-limited incremental cycle exercise tests. Thirty-two age-matched nonsmoking controls were also studied. Thirty-three (53%) of smokers had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by LLN criteria. In smokers [n = 62; age 65 ± 11 years; smoking history 43 ± 19 pack-years; post-bronchodilator FEV1 z-score -0.60 ± 0.72 and FEV1/FVC z-score -1.56 ± 0.87 (mean ± SD)] versus controls, peak oxygen uptake (̇VO2) was 21 ± 7 vs. 32 ± 9 ml/kg/min, and dyspnea/̇VO2 slopes were elevated (both p < 0.0001). Smokers had evidence of peripheral airway dysfunction and maldistribution of ventilation when compared to controls. In smokers versus controls: lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 85 ± 22 vs. 105 ± 17% predicted, and residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC) was 36 ± 8 vs. 31 ± 6% (both p < 0.01). The strongest correlates of peak ̇VO2 were DLCO% predicted (r = 0.487, p < 0.0005) and RV/TLC% (r = -0.389, p = 0.002). DLCO% predicted was also the strongest correlate of dyspnea/̇VO2 slope (r = -0.352, p = 0.005). In smokers with mild airway obstruction, associations between resting tests of mechanics and pulmonary gas exchange and exercise performance parameters were weak, albeit consistent. Among these, DLCO showed the strongest association with important outcomes such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance measured during standardized incremental exercise tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusing capacity; dyspnea; exercise; gas trapping; smokers

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368706     DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1281901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  COPD        ISSN: 1541-2563            Impact factor:   2.409


  4 in total

1.  Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide in Assessment of COPD.

Authors:  Aparna Balasubramanian; Neil R MacIntyre; Robert J Henderson; Robert L Jensen; Gregory Kinney; William W Stringer; Craig P Hersh; Russell P Bowler; Richard Casaburi; MeiLan K Han; Janos Porszasz; R Graham Barr; Barry J Make; Robert A Wise; Meredith C McCormack
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Measurement and Interpretation of Exercise Ventilatory Efficiency.

Authors:  Devin B Phillips; Sophie É Collins; Michael K Stickland
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Lung volumes identify an at-risk group in persons with prolonged secondhand tobacco smoke exposure but without overt airflow obstruction.

Authors:  Mehrdad Arjomandi; Siyang Zeng; Jeroen Geerts; Rachel K Stiner; Bruce Bos; Ian van Koeverden; Jason Keene; Brett Elicker; Paul D Blanc; Warren M Gold
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2018-05-05

4.  Feasibility and challenges of using multiple breath washout in COPD.

Authors:  Alan S Bell; Philip J Lawrence; Dave Singh; Alexander Horsley
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-07-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.