Greg Bowden1,2, Jonathon Cavaleri3, Edward Monaco1,2, Ajay Niranjan1,2, John Flickinger4,2, L Dade Lunsford1,2. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Penn-sylvania. 3. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) have a well-documented response to Gamma Knife® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, there are limited data available regarding the volumetric response of cystic tumors. OBJECTIVE: This report correlates the radiographic appearance of VS before radiosurgery with the delayed volumetric response. METHODS: This study reviewed our SRS experience with 219 VS patients between 2003 and 2013. Patients were treatment naïve and had a significant extracanalicular tumor volume. Magnetic resonance imaging at the time of SRS identified 42 contrast-enhancing macrocystic tumors, 45 contrast-enhancing microcystic tumors, and 132 homogeneously enhancing tumors with no intratumoral cyst formation. The median follow-up was 49.1 months. The median tumor volume was 2.6 cm 3 (0.70-16.1 cm 3 ) and the median dose was 12.5 Gy (11-13 Gy). RESULTS: The actuarial tumor control rate was 99.4% at 2 years and 96.4% at 5 years. A volumetric reduction of >20% occurred in 85.4% of macrocystic tumors, 76.1% of microcystic tumors, and 62.8% of homogeneously enhancing VS. The median volume decrease per year for macrocystic, microcystic, and homogenous tumors was 17.2%, 7.5%, and 7.9% per year respectively ( P < .001). A 2:1 blinded volumetric case match showed a significant size reduction in macrocystic tumors compared to noncystic tumors ( P = .007). Serviceable hearing was maintained in 61.5% of patients that had Gardner-Robertson grade I-II hearing before treatment. Surgical resection or repeat radiosurgery was performed in 8 patients (3.6%) who had sustained tumor progression. CONCLUSION: SRS provided VS tumor control in >95% of patients, regardless of radiographic characteristics. Tumor volume regression was most evident in patients with cystic tumors.
BACKGROUND:Vestibular schwannomas (VS) have a well-documented response to Gamma Knife® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, there are limited data available regarding the volumetric response of cystic tumors. OBJECTIVE: This report correlates the radiographic appearance of VS before radiosurgery with the delayed volumetric response. METHODS: This study reviewed our SRS experience with 219 VS patients between 2003 and 2013. Patients were treatment naïve and had a significant extracanalicular tumor volume. Magnetic resonance imaging at the time of SRS identified 42 contrast-enhancing macrocystic tumors, 45 contrast-enhancing microcystic tumors, and 132 homogeneously enhancing tumors with no intratumoral cyst formation. The median follow-up was 49.1 months. The median tumor volume was 2.6 cm 3 (0.70-16.1 cm 3 ) and the median dose was 12.5 Gy (11-13 Gy). RESULTS: The actuarial tumor control rate was 99.4% at 2 years and 96.4% at 5 years. A volumetric reduction of >20% occurred in 85.4% of macrocystic tumors, 76.1% of microcystic tumors, and 62.8% of homogeneously enhancing VS. The median volume decrease per year for macrocystic, microcystic, and homogenous tumors was 17.2%, 7.5%, and 7.9% per year respectively ( P < .001). A 2:1 blinded volumetric case match showed a significant size reduction in macrocystic tumors compared to noncystic tumors ( P = .007). Serviceable hearing was maintained in 61.5% of patients that had Gardner-Robertson grade I-II hearing before treatment. Surgical resection or repeat radiosurgery was performed in 8 patients (3.6%) who had sustained tumor progression. CONCLUSION: SRS provided VS tumor control in >95% of patients, regardless of radiographic characteristics. Tumor volume regression was most evident in patients with cystic tumors.
Authors: Stephen Johnson; Hideyuki Kano; Andrew Faramand; Matthew Pease; Aya Nakamura; Mohab Hassib; David Spencer; Nathaniel Sisterson; Amir H Faraji; Yoshio Arai; Edward Monaco; Ajay Niranjan; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Inpyeong Hwang; Seung Hong Choi; Jin Wook Kim; Eung Koo Yeon; Ji Ye Lee; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Daniela Stastna; Richard Mannion; Patrick Axon; David Andrew Moffat; Neil Donnelly; James R Tysome; David G Hardy; Mahonar Bance; Alexis Joannides; Indu Lawes; Robert Macfarlane Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Chloe Dumot; Stylianos Pikis; Georgios Mantziaris; Zhiyuan Xu; Rithika Kormath Anand; Ahmed M Nabeel; Darrah Sheehan; Kimball Sheehan; Wael A Reda; Sameh R Tawadros; Khaled Abdel Karim; Amr M N El-Shehaby; Reem M Emad Eldin; Selcuk Peker; Yavuz Samanci; Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz; Herwin Speckter; Wenceslao Hernández; Julio Isidor; Manjul Tripathi; Renu Madan; Brad E Zacharia; Lekhaj C Daggubati; Nuria Martínez Moreno; Roberto Martínez Álvarez; Anne-Marie Langlois; David Mathieu; Christopher P Deibert; Vivek R Sudhakar; Christopher P Cifarelli; Denisse Arteaga Icaza; Daniel T Cifarelli; Zhishuo Wei; Ajay Niranjan; Gene H Barnett; L Dade Lunsford; Greg N Bowden; Jason P Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Michael Huo; Heath Foley; Mark Pinkham; Mihir Shanker; Anne Bernard; Michael Jenkins; Sarah Olson; Bruce Hall; Trevor Watkins; Catherine Jones; Matthew Foote Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2020
Authors: Janet Leon; Eric J Lehrer; Jennifer Peterson; Laura Vallow; Henry Ruiz-Garcia; Austin Hadley; Steven Herchko; Larry Lundy; Kaisorn Chaichana; Prasanna Vibhute; Jason P Sheehan; Daniel M Trifiletti Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2019