Literature DB >> 35832985

Facial Nerve Function Outcome and Risk Factors in Resection of Large Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas.

Daniela Stastna1, Richard Mannion1, Patrick Axon2, David Andrew Moffat2, Neil Donnelly2, James R Tysome2, David G Hardy2, Mahonar Bance2, Alexis Joannides1, Indu Lawes1, Robert Macfarlane1.   

Abstract

Objective  Cystic vestibular schwannomas (VS) in contrast to solid VS tend to have accelerated growth, larger volume, rapid/atypical presentation, lobulated/adherent surface, and unpredictable course of the cranial nerves. Cystic VS are surgically challenging, with worse clinical outcomes and higher rate of subtotal resection (STR). Methods  We retrospectively analyzed postoperative outcomes of 125 patients with cystic VS, operated between years 2005 and 2019 in our center. We confronted the extent of the resection and House-Brackmann (HB) grade of facial palsy with the results of comparable cohort of patients with solid VS operated in our center and literature review by Thakur et al. 1 Results  Translabyrinthine approach was preferred for resection of large, cystic VS (97.6%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 78 patients (62.4%), near-total resection (NTR) with remnant (<4 × 4 × 2 mm) in 43 patients (34.4%), and STR in 4 patients (3.2%). NTR/STR were significantly associated with higher age, tumor volume >5 cm 3 , retrosigmoid approach, high-riding jugular bulb, tumor adherence to the brain stem, and facial nerve ( p  = 0.016; 0.003; 0.005; 0.025; 0.001; and <0.00001, respectively). One year after the surgery, 76% of patients had HB grades 1 to 2, 16% had HB grades 3 to 4, and 8% had HB grades 5 to 6 palsy. Worse outcome (HB grades 3 to 6) was associated with preoperative facial palsy, tumor volume >25 cm 3 , and cyst over the brain stem ( p  = 0.045; 0.014; and 0.05, respectively). Comparable solid VS operated in our center had significantly higher HB grades 1 to 2 rate than our cystic VS (94% versus 76%; p  = 0.03). Comparing our results with literature review, our HB grades 1 to 2 rate was significantly higher (76% versus 39%; p  = 0.0001). Tumor control rate 5 years after surgery was 95.8%. Conclusion  Our study confirmed that microsurgery of cystic VS has worse outcomes of facial nerve preservation and extent of resection compared with solid VS. Greater attention should be paid to the above-mentioned risk factors. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cystic vestibular schwannoma; facial nerve outcome; long-term outcome; microsurgery; near-total resection

Year:  2021        PMID: 35832985      PMCID: PMC9272284          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  26 in total

1.  Giant vestibular schwannomas: focusing on the differences between the solid and the cystic variants.

Authors:  N Mehrotra; S Behari; L Pal; D Banerji; R N Sahu; V K Jain
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Acoustic neurinomas with macrocysts treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  G Pendl; J C Ganz; K Kitz; S Eustacchio
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Microanatomical variations in the cerebellopontine angle associated with vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): a retrospective study of 1006 consecutive cases.

Authors:  P Sampath; D Rini; D M Long
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Microhemorrhage, a possible mechanism for cyst formation in vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park; Dong-Chul Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Jeong Eun Kim; Sun Ha Paek; Dong Gyu Kim; Hee-Won Jung
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Do cystic vestibular schwannomas have worse surgical outcomes? Systematic analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Jai Deep Thakur; Imad Saeed Khan; Cedric D Shorter; Ashish Sonig; Gale L Gardner; Bharat Guthikonda; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Cystic acoustic schwannomas: MR characteristics.

Authors:  E T Tali; W T Yuh; H D Nguyen; G Feng; T M Koci; J R Jinkins; R A Robinson; A N Hasso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Cystic acoustic neuromas. Results of translabyrinthine surgery.

Authors:  S Charabi; M Tos; S E Børgesen; J Thomsen
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-12

8.  Surgery for acoustic neurinoma. An analysis of 100 translabyrinthine operations.

Authors:  D G Hardy; R Macfarlane; D Baguley; D A Moffat
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Cystic vestibular schwannomas: a possible role of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in cyst development and unfavorable surgical outcome.

Authors:  Kyung-Sub Moon; Shin Jung; Seung-Kwon Seo; Tae-Young Jung; In-Young Kim; Hyang-Hwa Ryu; Yong-Hao Jin; Shu-Guang Jin; Young-Il Jeong; Kyung-Keun Kim; Sam-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Subtotal resection of vestibular schwannoma: Evaluation with Ki-67 measurement, magnetic resonance imaging, and long-term observation.

Authors:  Giannicola Iannella; Marco de Vincentiis; Cira Di Gioia; Raffaella Carletti; Benedetta Pasquariello; Alessandra Manno; Diletta Angeletti; Ersilia Savastano; Giuseppe Magliulo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.