Kathleen Collins1, Brittany Rohl1, Sarah Morgan1, Edward D Huey2, Elan D Louis1, Stephanie Cosentino3. 1. 1Division of Movement Disorders,Department of Neurology,Yale School of Medicine,Yale University,New Haven,Connecticut. 2. 2Department of Psychiatry,College of Physicians and Surgeons,Columbia University,New York,New York. 3. 3Department of Neurology,College of Physicians and Surgeons,Columbia University,New York,New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Individuals with essential tremor (ET) exhibit a range of cognitive deficits generally conceptualized as "dysexecutive" or "fronto-subcortical," and thought to reflect disrupted cortico-cerebellar networks. In light of emerging evidence that ET increases risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is critical to more closely examine the nature of specific cognitive deficits in ET, with particular attention to amnestic deficits that may signal early AD. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 128 ET cases (age 80.4±9.5 years) enrolled in a longitudinal, clinical-pathological study. Cases underwent a comprehensive battery of motor-free neuropsychological tests and a functional assessment to inform clinical diagnoses of normal cognition (ET-NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (ET-MCI), or dementia (ET-D). ET-MCI was subdivided into subtypes including: amnestic single-domain (a-MCI), amnestic multi-domain (a-MCI+), non-amnestic single-domain (na-MCI), or non-amnestic multi-domain (na-MCI+). RESULTS: Ninety-one (71.1%) cases were ET-NC, 24 (18.8%) were ET-MCI, and 13 (10.2%) were ET-D. Within MCI, the a-MCI+ subtype was the most common (13/24; 54.2%) followed by a-MCI (4/24; 16.7%), na-MCI+ (4/24; 16.7%), and na-MCI (3/24; 12.5%). Cases with amnestic MCI demonstrated lower recognition memory Z-scores (-2.4±1.7) than non-amnestic groups (-0.9±1.2) (p=.042). CONCLUSIONS: Amnestic MCI, defined by impaired memory recall but associated with lower memory storage scores, was the most frequent MCI subtype in our study. Such impairment has not been explicitly discussed in the context of ET and may be an early hallmark of AD. Results have implications for the prognosis of specific cognitive deficits in ET. (JINS, 2017, 23, 390-399).
OBJECTIVES: Individuals with essential tremor (ET) exhibit a range of cognitive deficits generally conceptualized as "dysexecutive" or "fronto-subcortical," and thought to reflect disrupted cortico-cerebellar networks. In light of emerging evidence that ET increases risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is critical to more closely examine the nature of specific cognitive deficits in ET, with particular attention to amnestic deficits that may signal early AD. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 128 ET cases (age 80.4±9.5 years) enrolled in a longitudinal, clinical-pathological study. Cases underwent a comprehensive battery of motor-free neuropsychological tests and a functional assessment to inform clinical diagnoses of normal cognition (ET-NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (ET-MCI), or dementia (ET-D). ET-MCI was subdivided into subtypes including: amnestic single-domain (a-MCI), amnestic multi-domain (a-MCI+), non-amnestic single-domain (na-MCI), or non-amnestic multi-domain (na-MCI+). RESULTS: Ninety-one (71.1%) cases were ET-NC, 24 (18.8%) were ET-MCI, and 13 (10.2%) were ET-D. Within MCI, the a-MCI+ subtype was the most common (13/24; 54.2%) followed by a-MCI (4/24; 16.7%), na-MCI+ (4/24; 16.7%), and na-MCI (3/24; 12.5%). Cases with amnestic MCI demonstrated lower recognition memory Z-scores (-2.4±1.7) than non-amnestic groups (-0.9±1.2) (p=.042). CONCLUSIONS:Amnestic MCI, defined by impaired memory recall but associated with lower memory storage scores, was the most frequent MCI subtype in our study. Such impairment has not been explicitly discussed in the context of ET and may be an early hallmark of AD. Results have implications for the prognosis of specific cognitive deficits in ET. (JINS, 2017, 23, 390-399).
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognition; Dementia; Executive function; Longitudinal; Memory; Movement disorders
Authors: Mona K Beyer; Kolbjorn S Bronnick; Kristy S Hwang; Niels Bergsland; Ole Bjorn Tysnes; Jan Petter Larsen; Paul M Thompson; Johanne H Somme; Liana G Apostolova Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Françoise Lekeu; Martial Van der Linden; Christian Degueldre; Christian Lemaire; André Luxen; Georges Franck; Gustave Moonen; Eric Salmon Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Joanne M Hamilton; David P Salmon; Douglas Galasko; Dean C Delis; Lawrence A Hansen; Eliezer Masliah; Ronald G Thomas; Leon J Thal Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Edward D Huey; Stephanie Cosentino; Silvia Chapman; Martina Azar; Brittany Rohl; Kathleen Collins; Sarah Morgan; Xinhua Liu; Elan D Louis Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Kurt Farrell; Stephanie Cosentino; Megan A Iida; Silvia Chapman; David A Bennett; Phyllis L Faust; Elan D Louis; John F Crary Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Sarah Kellner; Sarah Morgan; Jesus Gutierrez; Kathleen Collins; Brittany Rohl; Fanny Migliore; Stephanie Cosentino; Edward D Huey; Elan D Louis; Joan K Monin Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Tess E K Cersonsky; Sarah Kellner; Silvia Chapman; Edward D Huey; Elan D Louis; Stephanie Cosentino Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Soong Ho Kim; Kurt Farrell; Stephanie Cosentino; Jean-Paul G Vonsattel; Phyllis L Faust; Etty P Cortes; David A Bennet; Elan D Louis; John F Crary Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 3.148
Authors: Adrianna M Ratajska; Francesca V Lopez; Lauren Kenney; Charles Jacobson; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Dawn Bowers Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 4.373
Authors: Nikki Delgado; Daniella Iglesias Hernandez; Keith Radler; Edward D Huey; Stephanie Cosentino; Elan Louis Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 4.553