| Literature DB >> 28367444 |
Sibtain Ahmed1, Ghulam Mustafa2, Muhammad Arshad3, Muhammad Ibrahim Rajoka4.
Abstract
Industrially important enzymes and microbial biomass proteins have been produced from fungi for more than 50 years. High levels of crude protein as much as 45% are present in fungal biomass with balanced essential amino acids. The aim of this study was to access the potential of Trichoderma harzianum to produce fungal biomass protein from rice polishings. Maximum biomass yield was obtained at 5% (w/v) rice polishings after 72 h of incubation at 28°C at pH 4. Carbon and nitrogen ratio of 20 : 1 gave significantly higher production of fungal biomass protein. The FBP in the 75 L fermenter contained 49.50% crude protein, 32.00% true protein, 19.45% crude fiber, 9.62% ash, 11.5% cellulose content, and 0.325% RNA content. The profile of amino acids of final FBP exhibited that all essential amino acids were present in great quantities. The FBP produced by this fungus has been shown to be of good nutritional value for supplementation to poultry. The results presented in this study have practical implications in that the fungus T. harzianum could be used successfully to produce fungal biomass protein using rice polishings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28367444 PMCID: PMC5358476 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6232793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Effect of different rice polishings concentrations (% w/v) on FBP production by T. harzianum at pH 4 and 28°C after 72 h. Error bars show standard deviation among triplicate observations.
Figure 2Effect of pH on FBP production by T. harzianum. Error bars show standard deviation among triplicate observations.
Figure 3Effect of temperature on FBP production in 5 L fermenter under optimized fermentation conditions. Error bars show standard deviation among n = 3 readings.
Figure 4Time course of fungal crude protein and cell mass production by T. harzianum under preoptimized fermentation conditions. Error bars show standard deviation among n = 3 observations.
Figure 5Effect of various levels of ionic concentration on fungal biomass protein production from rice polishings by T. harzianum.
Figure 6Effect of different C : N ratio FBP protein production by T. harzianum grown on rice polishings. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 stand for C : N ratios of 30 : 1, 25 : 1, 20 : 1, 15 : 1, 10 : 1, and 5 : 1. Error bars show standard deviation among n = 3 readings.
Kinetic parameters for crude protein and cell mass production along with substrate utilization by T. harzianum in 5-L fermenter under optimized fermentation conditions.
| Kinetic parameters | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.15 ± 0.01b | 0.21 ± 0.01a | 0.23 ± 0.01a | 0.09 ± 0.01c | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.01b,c | 0.24 ± 0.01a,b | 0.27 ± 0.02a | 0.19 ± 0.01c | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.47 ± 0.01a | 0.49 ± 0.01a | 0.49 ± 0.01a | 0.43 ± 0.01b | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.05a | 0.23 ± 0.02a | 0.23 ± 0.05a | 0.20 ± 0.01a | 0.698 |
|
| 0.032 ± 0.004c | 0.103 ± 0.002b | 0.113 ± 0.003a | 0.039 ± 0.002c | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.88 ± 0.02c | 1.25 ± 0.02a | 1.13 ± 0.03b | 0.56 ± 0.03d | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.39 ± 0.04a | 0.48 ± 0.05a | 0.42 ± 0.05a | 0.39 ± 0.05a | 0.146 |
|
| 0.45 ± 0.03a | 0.50 ± 0.03a | 0.46 ± 0.03a | 0.43 ± 0.03a | 0.102 |
Values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments.
a,b,c,dMeans ± SD followed by different superscripts in each row are significantly different at confidence level P ≤ 0.05 using Tukey's multiple range test.
Thermodynamic parameters for reversible activation and irreversible inactivation of SCP production pathway of T. harzianum.
| Temp. (K) | Temp. (°C) |
| Δ | Δ | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 293 | 20 | 8.5 ± 0.44c,d | 35.06 ± 2a | 72.52 ± 3.5b,c | −127.85 ± 8a,b |
| 295 | 22 | 9.2 ± 0.45c | 35.05 ± 2a | 78.49 ± 3.5a,b,c | −147.25 ± 9b,c |
| 297 | 24 | 9.7 ± 0.45b,c | 35.045 ± 2a | 82.76 ± 4a,b | −160.66 ± 10c |
| 299 | 26 | 10.6 ± 0.51a,b | 35.01 ± 2a | 74.14 ± 3.5a,b,c | −231.2 ± 17d |
| 301 | 28 | 11.3 ± 0.55a | 37.0 ± 2.3a | 67.66 ± 3.5c | −101.86 ± 7a |
| 303 | 30 | 9.4 ± 0.41b,c | 34.08 ± 2a | 80.2 ± 4a,b | −152.21 ± 10b,c |
| 305 | 32 | 8.8 ± 0.42c,d | 34.06 ± 2a | 80.91 ± 4a,b | −153.61 ± 10b,c |
| 307 | 34 | 7.6 ± 0.43d,e | 34.05 ± 2a | 81.83 ± 4a,b | −155.64 ± 10b,c |
| 309 | 36 | 6.6 ± 0.34e,f | 34.03 ± 2a | 82.75 ± 4a,b | −157.67 ± 10b,c |
| 311 | 38 | 5.8 ± 0.34f | 34.02 ± 2a | 83.63 ± 4a | −159.52 ± 10c |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.0001 | 0.754 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |
a,b,c,d,e,fValues followed by different superscripts in each column differ significantly at confidence level P ≤ 0.05 using Tukey's multiple range test.
ΔG (kJ mol−1) = −RTln(q · h)/(k · T) and ΔS = (ΔH − ΔG)/T.
ΔH, ΔG, and ΔS are enthalpy, Gibbs free energy, and entropy of irreversible inactivation of SCP formation pathway, respectively.
Figure 7(a) Determination of activation energy for FBP production activation and deactivation network. (b) Determination of enthalpy and entropy for activation of FBP formation and inactivation equilibria of FBP in T. harzianum following growth on rice polishings medium under optimized condition. AB is one line and AC is the second line whose slopes have been calculated statistically to determine entropy and enthalpy values.
Thermodynamic parameters for activation and deactivation pathways for FBP production.
| Attributes | SCP formation | Thermal inactivation |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Activation energy | 37.5 ± 2b | 42.57 ± 1.5a | 0.025 |
| Activation enthalpy (kJ/mol) | 73.2 ± 3b | 82.47 ± 2a | 0.011 |
| Activation entropy (J/mol·K) | −16.88 ± 4a | −535 ± 14b | 0.0001 |
Each value is a mean of three replicates. Values followed by different superscripts in each row differ significantly at confidence level P ≤ 0.05 using Tukey's multiple range test.
Compositional analysis of rice polishings and biomass (% dry weight).
| Components | Rice polishings | Biomass obtained from |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 6.77 ± 0.2a | 1.50 ± 0.08b | 0.0001 |
| Crude protein | 11.25 ± 0.5b | 49.50 ± 1.7a | 0.0001 |
| True protein | 1.0 ± 0.1b | 32.00 ± 1.3a | 0.0001 |
| Crude fat | 11.73 ± 0.6b | 21.25 ± 0.74a | 0.0001 |
| Crude fiber | 6.25 ± 0.21b | 19.45 ± 0.78a | 0.0001 |
| Ash | 9.50 ± 0.4a | 9.62 ± 0.5a | 0.762 |
| Nitrogen Free extract | 54.50 ± 2.7a | 28.33 ± 1.1b | 0.0001 |
| Cellulose | 10.76 ± 0.43a | 11.5 ± 0.46a | 0.112 |
| RNA | ND | 0.325 ± 0.02 | ND |
ND = not determined; values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments.
a,bMeans ± SD followed by different superscripts in each row are significantly different at confidence level P ≤ 0.05 using Tukey's multiple range test.
Amino acid profile of biomass by T. harzianum in 75 L fermenter.
| S. number | Amino acid | Rice polishings (%) | Biomass% produced in a |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aspartic acid | 0.76 ± 0.04b | 1.05 ± 0.04a | 0.0004 |
| 2 | Threonine | 0.43 ± 0.02b | 0.70 ± 0.03a | 0.0001 |
| 3 | Serine | 0.51 ± 0.03b | 0.75 ± 0.04a | 0.0001 |
| 4 | Glutamic acid | 1.80 ± 0.05b | 4.76 ± 0.17a | 0.0001 |
| 5 | Proline | 0.74 ± 0.04b | 1.85 ± 0.074a | 0.0001 |
| 6 | Glycine | 0.55 ± 0.03b | 0.76 ± 0.03a | 0.0005 |
| 7 | Alanine | 0.62 ± 0.03b | 0.86 ± 0.03a | 0.001 |
| 8 | Valine | 0.61 ± 0.03b | 1.05 ± 0.05a | 0.0001 |
| 9 | Methionine | 0.00 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | ND |
| 10 | Isoleucine | 0.37 ± 0.02b | 0.69 ± 0.024a | 0.0001 |
| 11 | Leucine | 0.68 ± 0.03b | 1.18 ± 0.04a | 0.0001 |
| 12 | Tyrosine | 0.27 ± 0.02b | 0.51 ± 0.03a | 0.0002 |
| 13 | Phenylalanine | 0.55 ± 0.025b | 1.00 ± 0.03a | 0.0001 |
| 14 | Lysine | 0.57 ± 0.03b | 21.34 ± 0.75a | 0.0001 |
| 15 | Histidine | 0.30 ± 0.01b | 0.73 ± 0.04a | 0.0001 |
| 16 | Arginine | 0.66 ± 0.04b | 1.14 ± 0.06a | 0.0003 |
Test samples were hydrolyzed with HCl and analyzed using an automated amino acid analyzer.
ND = not determined; values are mean ± SD of n = 3 experiments.
a,bMeans ± SD followed by different superscripts in each row are significantly different at confidence level P ≤ 0.05 using Tukey's multiple range test.