| Literature DB >> 28366992 |
Masae Sakuma1, Yuuka Morimoto1, Yukie Suzuki1, Akitsu Suzuki1, Saaya Noda1, Kanaho Nishino1, Sakiko Ando1, Makoto Ishikawa2, Hidekazu Arai1.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of dietary phosphorus intake is necessary to prevent hyperphosphatemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 24-h urine collection method for estimation of phosphate intake in healthy males. Two experiments, a 1-day and a 5-day loading test, were performed. After an overnight fast, subjects consumed test meals, 24-h urine collection was performed, and blood samples were obtained. In the 5-day loading test, a phosphorus supplement was orally administered on day 3. The association between the phosphorus content of test meals and urinary excretion, anthropometric indices, and blood biomarkers was analyzed to develop a more precise formula for estimating phosphorus intake. In the 1-day loading test, the standard deviation of predictive phosphorus intake, based on multiple linear regression analysis, was less than that for the phosphorus absorption rate. In the 5-day loading test, urinary phosphorus excretion was similar on days 2, 4 and 5, but was significantly higher on day 3 after phosphorus supplementation. Our results indicate that estimation of dietary phosphorus intake with the 24-h urine collection method, using the amount of phosphorus and urea nitrogen excretion, may increase the precision of short-term monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: 24-h urine collection; dietary phosphorus; loading test; urine nitrogen excretion; urine phosphorus excretion
Year: 2016 PMID: 28366992 PMCID: PMC5370530 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.16-50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Characteristics of the subjects in a loading test of a single day
| Characteristic | mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | (year) | 22.9 ± 1.8 |
| Body weight | (kg) | 63.7 ± 9.5 |
| Body fat percentage | (%) | 18.1 ± 3.6 |
| Body mass index | (kg/m2) | 22.2 ± 2.5 |
| Triglyceride | (mg/dl) | 71.8 ± 22.7 |
| LDL-cholesterol | (mg/dl) | 82.0 ± 15.1 |
| HDL-cholesterol | (mg/dl) | 60.8 ± 11.4 |
| HbA1c (NGSP) | (%) | 5.2 ± 0.3 |
| Albumin | (g/dl) | 4.8 ± 0.3 |
| AST | (U/L) | 16.5 ± 3.5 |
| ALT | (U/L) | 12.8 ± 3.1 |
| γ-GTP | (U/L) | 16.5 ± 4.2 |
| Blood urea nitrogen | (mg/dl) | 11.4 ± 2.5 |
| Creatinine | (mg/dl) | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| Ccr | (ml/min) | 129.1 ± 8.8 |
| Na | (mEq/L) | 140.3 ± 1.2 |
| K | (mEq/L) | 4.2 ± 0.1 |
| Ca | (mg/dl) | 9.6 ± 0.4 |
| Pi | (mg/dl) | 4.0 ± 0.4 |
| intact PTH | (pg/ml) | 39.7 ± 11.2 |
Values are mean ± SD. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; Ccr, creatinine clearance; Na, sodium; K, potassium; Ca, calcium; Pi, phosphorus; iPTH, intact PTH.
Characteristics of the subjects in a loading test of 5 days
| Characteristic | mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | (year) | 22.8 ± 1.6 |
| Body weight | (kg) | 64.2 ± 8.5 |
| Body fat percentage | (%) | 17.6 ± 4.3 |
| Body mass index | (kg/m2) | 21.3 ± 2.2 |
| Triglyceride | (mg/dl) | 94.1 ± 38.3 |
| LDL-cholesterol | (mg/dl) | 80.0 ± 20.5 |
| HDL-cholesterol | (mg/dl) | 52.3 ± 11.8 |
| HbA1c (NGSP) | (%) | 5.2 ± 0.3 |
| Albumin | (g/dl) | 4.7 ± 0.3 |
| AST | (U/L) | 19.8 ± 3.4 |
| ALT | (U/L) | 18.5 ± 4.1 |
| γ-GTP | (U/L) | 21.6 ± 6.8 |
| Blood urea nitrogen | (mg/dl) | 11.2 ± 1.9 |
| Creatinine | (mg/dl) | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| Ccr | (ml/min) | 121.7 ± 10.1 |
| Na | (mEq/L) | 141.3 ± 0.7 |
| K | (mEq/L) | 4.4 ± 0.5 |
| Ca | (mg/dl) | 9.6 ± 0.3 |
| Pi | (mg/dl) | 3.9 ± 0.2 |
| intact PTH | (pg/ml) | 36.1 ± 10.3 |
Values are mean ± SD. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; Ccr, creatinine clearance; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; Na, sodium; K, potassium; Ca, calcium; Pi, phosphorus; iPTH, intact PTH.
Fig. 1Schema of 5-day loading test.
Composition of the test meals
| Energy (kcal) | Protein (g) | Fat (g) | Carbohydrate (g) | Phosphorus (mg) | Calcium (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakfast | 668 | 28.0 | 18.2 | 104.9 | 473 | 348 |
| Lunch | 753 | 19.6 | 16.9 | 130.2 | 240 | 92 |
| Dinner | 716 | 22.6 | 14.4 | 124.1 | 425 | 180 |
| Total | 2,137 | 70.2 | 49.2 | 359.2 | 1,138 | 620 |
| %Energy | 13.1 | 20.7 | 67.2 |
Pearson’s correction coefficients of difference between estimated phosphorus and dietary phosphorus with metabolic variables
| UC-P75 – TM-P | |
|---|---|
| Body weight | 0.54 |
| Body fat percentage | 0.47 |
| Body fat | 0.52 |
| Fat free mass | 0.49 |
| Body surface area | 0.55 |
| Ccr | 0.44 |
| 24-h urinary UN excretion | 0.77 |
| 24-h urinary Cre excretion | 0.53 |
| 24-h urinary Na excretion | –0.02 |
| 24-h urinary Ca excretion | 0.39 |
| Serum Pi | –0.17 |
| Serum Ca# | 0.19 |
| Serum intact PTH | –0.12 |
| Serum Cre | 0.15 |
| Serum total protein | 0.27 |
| Serum albumin | 0.28 |
#Spearman’s correction coefficient. *p<0.05, **p<0.01. UC-P75, phosphorus intake estimated from 24-h urine as phosphorus absorption rate is 75%; TM-P, posphorus intake from test meal; Ccr, creatinine clearance; Pi, phosphorus; UN, urine nitrogen; Cre, creatinine; Na, sodium; Ca, calcium.
Association between difference of phosphorus intake with metabolic variables
| Difference of phosphorus intake | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| non-standardization coefficient | 95%CI | β | |||
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| (Constant) | –596.671 | –896.661 | –296.680 | 0.001 | |
| 24-h urinary UN | 63.668 | 32.223 | 95.113 | 0.772 | 0.001 |
Data were used multiple linear regression analysis. UN, urine nitrogen. Adjusted R2 variation; 0.564.
Fig. 2Difference in phosphorus intake using two methods. TM-P, phosphorus intake from test meal; UC-P75, phosphorus intake estimated from 24-h urine collection; Pre-P, predicted phosphorus intake. Black and bold line, mean value.
Fig. 3Transitional changes in urine and serum indices of phosphorus metabolism. (A) urine phosphorus excretion, (B) urine calcium excretion, (C) serum iPTH levels, (D) serum FGF23 levels. iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone; FGF23, fibroblast growth factor 23. Values with different alphabet are significantly different at p<0.05 by repeated measure one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman’s test with Tukey’s post hoc test.