Elizabeth R Stremke1, Linda D McCabe1, George P McCabe2, Berdine R Martin1, Sharon M Moe3,4, Connie M Weaver1, Munro Peacock5, Kathleen M Hill Gallant6,3. 1. Departments of Nutrition Science. 2. Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. 3. Divisions of Nephrology and. 4. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. 5. Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and. 6. Departments of Nutrition Science hillgallant@purdue.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Twenty-four-hour urine phosphorus is commonly used as a surrogate measure for phosphorus intake and absorption in research studies, but its reliability and accuracy are unproven in health or CKD. This secondary analysis sought to determine the reliability and accuracy of 24-hour urine phosphorus as a biomarker of phosphorus intake and absorption in moderate CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eight patients with stage 3-4 CKD participated in 2-week balance studies with tightly controlled phosphorus and calcium intakes. Thirteen 24-hour urine collections per patient were analyzed for variability and reliability of 24-hour urine phosphorus and phosphorus-to-creatinine ratio. The accuracy of 24-hour urine phosphorus to predict phosphorus intake was determined using a published equation. The relationships of 24-hour urine phosphorus with phosphorus intake, net absorption, and retention were determined. RESULTS: There was wide day-to-day variation in 24-hour urine phosphorus within and among subjects (coefficient of variation of 30% and 37%, respectively). Two 24-hour urine measures were needed to achieve ≥75% reliability. Estimating dietary phosphorus intake from a single 24-hour urine resulted in underestimation up to 98% in some patients and overestimation up to 79% in others. Twenty-four-hour urine phosphorus negatively correlated with whole-body retention but was not related to net absorption. CONCLUSIONS: From a sample of eight patients with moderate CKD on a tightly controlled dietary intake, 24-hour urine phosphorus was highly variable and did not relate to dietary phosphorus intake or absorption, rather it inversely related to phosphorus retention.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Twenty-four-hour urine phosphorus is commonly used as a surrogate measure for phosphorus intake and absorption in research studies, but its reliability and accuracy are unproven in health or CKD. This secondary analysis sought to determine the reliability and accuracy of 24-hour urine phosphorus as a biomarker of phosphorus intake and absorption in moderate CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eight patients with stage 3-4 CKD participated in 2-week balance studies with tightly controlled phosphorus and calcium intakes. Thirteen 24-hour urine collections per patient were analyzed for variability and reliability of 24-hour urine phosphorus and phosphorus-to-creatinine ratio. The accuracy of 24-hour urine phosphorus to predict phosphorus intake was determined using a published equation. The relationships of 24-hour urine phosphorus with phosphorus intake, net absorption, and retention were determined. RESULTS: There was wide day-to-day variation in 24-hour urine phosphorus within and among subjects (coefficient of variation of 30% and 37%, respectively). Two 24-hour urine measures were needed to achieve ≥75% reliability. Estimating dietary phosphorus intake from a single 24-hour urine resulted in underestimation up to 98% in some patients and overestimation up to 79% in others. Twenty-four-hour urine phosphorus negatively correlated with whole-body retention but was not related to net absorption. CONCLUSIONS: From a sample of eight patients with moderate CKD on a tightly controlled dietary intake, 24-hour urine phosphorus was highly variable and did not relate to dietary phosphorus intake or absorption, rather it inversely related to phosphorus retention.
Authors: Anna Carrigan; Andrew Klinger; Suzanne S Choquette; Alexandra Luzuriaga-McPherson; Emmy K Bell; Betty Darnell; Orlando M Gutiérrez Journal: J Ren Nutr Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.655
Authors: Alex R Chang; Mariana Lazo; Lawrence J Appel; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Morgan E Grams Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Nicole M Lioufas; Elaine M Pascoe; Carmel M Hawley; Grahame J Elder; Sunil V Badve; Geoffrey A Block; David W Johnson; Nigel D Toussaint Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Chi N Duong; Oladimeji J Akinlawon; Joseph Gung; Sabrina E Noel; Sherman Bigornia; Kaylea Flanagan; Shirin Pourafshar; Pao-Hwa Lin; Clemontina A Davenport; Jane Pendergast; Julia J Scialla; Katherine L Tucker Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 8.472
Authors: Kathleen M Hill Gallant; Elizabeth R Stremke; Laurie L Trevino; Ranjani N Moorthi; Simit Doshi; Meryl E Wastney; Nozomi Hisada; Jotaro Sato; Yoshitaka Ogita; Naohisa Fujii; Yuya Matsuda; Takei Kake; Sharon M Moe Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Mitra S Jamshidian; Brett Larive; Jennifer Gassman; Kalani L Raphael; Michel B Chonchol; Joachim H Ix; Charles Ginsberg Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 11.072
Authors: Elizabeth R Stremke; Gretchen N Wiese; Sharon M Moe; Meryl E Wastney; Ranjani N Moorthi; Kathleen M Hill Gallant Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 14.978