Literature DB >> 28366742

Heuristic Rules Underlying Dragonfly Prey Selection and Interception.

Huai-Ti Lin1, Anthony Leonardo2.   

Abstract

Animals use rules to initiate behaviors. Such rules are often described as triggers that determine when behavior begins. However, although less explored, these selection rules are also an opportunity to establish sensorimotor constraints that influence how the behavior ends. These constraints may be particularly significant in influencing success in prey capture. Here we explore this in dragonfly prey interception. We found that in the moments leading up to takeoff, perched dragonflies employ a series of sensorimotor rules that determine the time of takeoff and increase the probability of successful capture. First, the dragonfly makes a head saccade followed by smooth pursuit movements to orient its direction-of-gaze at potential prey. Second, the dragonfly assesses whether the prey's angular size and speed co-vary within a privileged range. Finally, the dragonfly times the moment of its takeoff to a prediction of when the prey will cross the zenith. Each of these processes serves a purpose. The angular size-speed criteria biases interception flights to catchable prey, while the head movements and the predictive takeoff ensure flights begin with the prey visually fixated and directly overhead-the key parameters that underlie interception steering. Prey that do not elicit takeoff generally fail at least one of the criterion, and the loss of prey fixation or overhead positioning during flight is strongly correlated with terminated flights. Thus from an abundance of potential targets, the dragonfly selects a stereotyped set of takeoff conditions based on the prey and body states most likely to end in successful capture.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  action selection; behavior; decision; guidance; insect; motion capture; sensorimotor control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28366742     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  14 in total

1.  Role of side-slip flight in target pursuit: blue-tailed damselflies (Ischnura elegans) avoid body rotation while approaching a moving perch.

Authors:  Ziv Kassner; Gal Ribak
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Prey speed influences the speed and structure of the raptorial strike of a 'sit-and-wait' predator.

Authors:  Sergio Rossoni; Jeremy E Niven
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Integration of visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback during head stabilization in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Payel Chatterjee; Agnish Dev Prusty; Umesh Mohan; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Webless spiders reverse bungee jump to catch prey.

Authors:  Tanvi Deora
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 5.  Quantifying behavior to solve sensorimotor transformations: advances from worms and flies.

Authors:  Adam J Calhoun; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Intersection of motor volumes predicts the outcome of ambush predation of larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Kiran Bhattacharyya; David L McLean; Malcolm A MacIver
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Gravity and active acceleration limit the ability of killer flies (Coenosia attenuata) to steer towards prey when attacking from above.

Authors:  S Rossoni; S T Fabian; G P Sutton; P T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Temperature effects on ballistic prey capture by a dragonfly larva.

Authors:  Estefania Quenta Herrera; Jérôme Casas; Olivier Dangles; Sylvain Pincebourde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Affordance-based versus current-future accounts of choosing whether to pursue or abandon the chase of a moving target.

Authors:  Scott T Steinmetz; Oliver W Layton; Nathaniel V Powell; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Interception by two predatory fly species is explained by a proportional navigation feedback controller.

Authors:  Samuel T Fabian; Mary E Sumner; Trevor J Wardill; Sergio Rossoni; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.