Literature DB >> 28366494

Intertrochanteric fracture: Association between the coronal position of the lag screw and stress distribution.

Changxiang Liang1, Ruiping Peng2, Nan Jiang3, Guoping Xie3, Lei Wang3, Bin Yu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: The best position of the lag screw in the femoral head for the fixation of intertrochanteric fracture is controversial. Traditional view suggests that it should be positioned in the central axis of the femoral neck with a tip-apex distance (TAD) of <25 mm, but the mechanical properties have not been reported yet. Herein, we aimed to investigate internal fixation with the lag screw placed in different positions on the femoral coronal plane by performing a finite element analysis and to identify a reasonable lag screw position after the internal stress distributions at the femoral head.
METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model of a healthy male's femur was set up, on which the intertrochanteric fracture model with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A) was based. Nine modalities of the model were established in accordance with different lag screw positions in the femoral head. Three-dimensional finite element calculations were conducted, and the distribution trends of characteristic high-stress concentration points were observed.
RESULTS: The area of high-stress concentration was distributed from the top of the femoral head to the medial cortex of the trochanteric region. Four characteristic high-stress concentration points were observed, and the following trends indicated that the lower the position of the lag screw, the greater its length.
CONCLUSIONS: A longer and lower lag screw may make the fixation sustain greater stress, reduce bone tissue stress correspondingly in intertrochanteric fractures fixated with PFN-A, and sustain greater stress and more cyclic load at the same bone density.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PFN-A; cut-out; finite element analysis; intertrochanteric fracture; lag screw position

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28366494     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  6 in total

1.  What is the most fixable intramedullary implant for basicervical fracture and transcervical shear fracture? - A finite element study.

Authors:  Motoharu Komatsu; Takehiro Iwami; Hiroaki Kijima; Tetsuya Kawano; Naohisa Miyakoshi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-09-20

2.  Loss of the posteromedial support: a risk factor for implant failure after fixation of AO 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Kai-Feng Ye; Yong Xing; Chuan Sun; Zhi-Yong Cui; Fang Zhou; Hong-Quan Ji; Yan Guo; Yang Lyu; Zhong-Wei Yang; Guo-Jin Hou; Yun Tian; Zhi-Shan Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Treatment of Coronal Plane Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures with a Microexternal Fixator Combined with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation.

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Jun Qian; Yunji Zeng; Liangshan Huang; Yuanlei Zheng
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Alaettin Özer; Kerim Öner; Ahmet Emin Okutan; Muhammet Salih Ayas
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

5.  Traction-bed-assisted reduction and double-plate fixation for treatment of comminuted femoral intertrochanteric fractures with coronal split.

Authors:  Liangcong Hu; Xudong Xie; Tiantian Wang; Bobin Mi; Hang Xue; Ze Lin; Yuan Xiong; Yiqiang Hu; Wu Zhou; Faqi Cao; Guohui Liu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-09

6.  A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?

Authors:  Kerim Öner; Serhat Durusoy; Alaettin Özer
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.