Literature DB >> 28366310

Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rates of Adoption and Early Complications.

J Joseph Gholson1, Kyle R Duchman1, Jesse E Otero1, Andrew J Pugely1, Yubo Gao1, John J Callaghan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When new technologies are introduced, it is important to evaluate the rate of adoption and outcomes compared with preexisting technology. The purpose of this study was to determine the adoption rate of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), to determine if the short-term complication rate changed over time with navigation, and to compare short-term complication rates of navigated and traditional TKA.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify 108,277 patients undergoing primary TKA between 2010 and 2014, of which 3573 cases (3.30%) were navigated. Rates of adoption of navigated TKA were determined. Differences in short-term complications by year were compared using propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Navigation utilization decreased from 4.96% in 2010 to 3.06% in 2014. Blood transfusion rates for the entire cohort decreased from 19% in 2011 to 6% in 2014, and was not decreased with navigation compared with traditional TKA in 2014 (P = .1309). Operative time was not increased by navigation, and average 94.2 minutes. There were no significant differences in all-cause complications, reoperation rate, unplanned readmission, or length of stay for any year.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a 38.3% decrease in TKA navigation utilization from 2010-2014. Blood transfusion rates decreased 68% over the 5-year study, and were not decreased with navigation in 2014. Navigation was not found to increase operative time. There were no significant differences in short-term complications, readmission rate, or length of stay between navigated and traditional TKA.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP; computer-assisted navigation; navigation utilization; new technology; short-term complications; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28366310     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Utilization and Short-Term Outcomes of Computer Navigation in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher N Carender; David E DeMik; Nicholas A Bedard; Alan G Shamrock; Qiang An; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

Review 2.  [Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Holger Bäthis; Paola Kappel; Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer; Matthias Fröhlich; Michael Caspers; Deha Murat Ates
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-23

3.  Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors.

Authors:  Joseph K Antonios; Shane Korber; Lakshmanan Sivasundaram; Cory Mayfield; Hyunwoo Paco Kang; Daniel A Oakes; Nathanael D Heckmann
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-03-12

4.  The learning curve associated with imageless navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michelle A Zabat; Christian T Oakley; Scott E Marwin; Morteza Meftah; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  A comparison of utilization and short-term complications of technology-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Trevor Simcox; Vivek Singh; Christian T Oakley; Omid S Barzideh; Ran Schwarzkopf; Joshua C Rozell
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-18

6.  Tech-trends in orthopedics 2018.

Authors:  Max Gordon
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.