Ramona Meister1, Alessa Jansen2, Martin Härter3, Yvonne Nestoriuc4, Levente Kriston3. 1. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: r.meister@uke.de. 2. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Federal Chamber of Psychotherapists, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate placebo and nocebo reactions in randomized controlled trials (RCT) of pharmacological treatments for persistent depressive disorder (PDD). METHODS: We conducted a systematic electronic search and included RCTs investigating antidepressants for the treatment of PDD. Outcomes were the number of patients experiencing response and remission in placebo arms (=placebo reaction). Additional outcomes were the incidence of patients experiencing adverse events and related discontinuations in placebo arms (=nocebo reaction). A priori defined effect modifiers were analyzed using a series of meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials were included in the analyses. We found a pooled placebo response rate of 31% and a placebo remission rate of 22%. The pooled adverse event rate and related discontinuations were 57% and 4%, respectively. All placebo arm outcomes were positively associated with the corresponding medication arm outcomes. Placebo response rate was associated with a greater proportion of patients with early onset depression, a smaller chance to receive placebo and a larger sample size. The adverse event rate in placebo arms was associated with a greater proportion of patients with early onset depression, a smaller proportion of females and a more recent publication. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled placebo and nocebo reaction rates in PDD were comparable to those in episodic depression. The identified effect modifiers should be considered to assess unbiased effects in RCTs, to influence placebo and nocebo reactions in practice. LIMITATIONS: Limitations result from the methodology applied, the fact that we conducted only univariate analyses, and the number and quality of included trials.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate placebo and nocebo reactions in randomized controlled trials (RCT) of pharmacological treatments for persistent depressive disorder (PDD). METHODS: We conducted a systematic electronic search and included RCTs investigating antidepressants for the treatment of PDD. Outcomes were the number of patients experiencing response and remission in placebo arms (=placebo reaction). Additional outcomes were the incidence of patients experiencing adverse events and related discontinuations in placebo arms (=nocebo reaction). A priori defined effect modifiers were analyzed using a series of meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials were included in the analyses. We found a pooled placebo response rate of 31% and a placebo remission rate of 22%. The pooled adverse event rate and related discontinuations were 57% and 4%, respectively. All placebo arm outcomes were positively associated with the corresponding medication arm outcomes. Placebo response rate was associated with a greater proportion of patients with early onset depression, a smaller chance to receive placebo and a larger sample size. The adverse event rate in placebo arms was associated with a greater proportion of patients with early onset depression, a smaller proportion of females and a more recent publication. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled placebo and nocebo reaction rates in PDD were comparable to those in episodic depression. The identified effect modifiers should be considered to assess unbiased effects in RCTs, to influence placebo and nocebo reactions in practice. LIMITATIONS: Limitations result from the methodology applied, the fact that we conducted only univariate analyses, and the number and quality of included trials.
Authors: Brett D M Jones; Lais B Razza; Cory R Weissman; Jewel Karbi; Tya Vine; Louise S Mulsant; Andre R Brunoni; M Ishrat Husain; Benoit H Mulsant; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: David M A Mehler; Moses O Sokunbi; Isabelle Habes; Kali Barawi; Leena Subramanian; Maxence Range; John Evans; Kerenza Hood; Michael Lührs; Paul Keedwell; Rainer Goebel; David E J Linden Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Elan A Cohen; Howard H Hassman; Larry Ereshefsky; David P Walling; Vera M Grindell; Richard S E Keefe; Katarzyna Wyka; William P Horan Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 7.853