| Literature DB >> 28362567 |
Leslie K John1, Grant E Donnelly2, Christina A Roberto3.
Abstract
In 2012, the New York City Board of Health prohibited restaurants from selling sugary drinks in containers that would hold more than 16 oz. Although a state court ruled that the Board of Health did not have the authority to implement such a policy, it remains a legally viable option for governments and a voluntary option for restaurants. However, there is very limited empirical data on how such a policy might affect the purchasing and consumption of sugary drinks. We report four well-powered, incentive-compatible experiments in which we evaluated two possible ways that restaurants might comply with such a policy: bundling (i.e., dividing the contents of oversized cups into two regulation-size cups) and providing free refills (i.e., offering a regulation-size cup with unlimited refills). Bundling caused people to buy less soda. Free refills increased consumption, especially when a waiter served the refills. This perverse effect was reduced in self-service contexts that required walking just a few steps to get a refill.Entities:
Keywords: consumption; health; open data; open materials; purchasing; sugar-sweetened beverage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28362567 PMCID: PMC5535080 DOI: 10.1177/0956797617692041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Sci ISSN: 0956-7976