Literature DB >> 28362567

Psychologically Informed Implementations of Sugary-Drink Portion Limits.

Leslie K John1, Grant E Donnelly2, Christina A Roberto3.   

Abstract

In 2012, the New York City Board of Health prohibited restaurants from selling sugary drinks in containers that would hold more than 16 oz. Although a state court ruled that the Board of Health did not have the authority to implement such a policy, it remains a legally viable option for governments and a voluntary option for restaurants. However, there is very limited empirical data on how such a policy might affect the purchasing and consumption of sugary drinks. We report four well-powered, incentive-compatible experiments in which we evaluated two possible ways that restaurants might comply with such a policy: bundling (i.e., dividing the contents of oversized cups into two regulation-size cups) and providing free refills (i.e., offering a regulation-size cup with unlimited refills). Bundling caused people to buy less soda. Free refills increased consumption, especially when a waiter served the refills. This perverse effect was reduced in self-service contexts that required walking just a few steps to get a refill.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consumption; health; open data; open materials; purchasing; sugar-sweetened beverage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28362567      PMCID: PMC5535080          DOI: 10.1177/0956797617692041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  Medicine. Do defaults save lives?

Authors:  Eric J Johnson; Daniel Goldstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Red potato chips: segmentation cues can substantially decrease food intake.

Authors:  Andrew Geier; Brian Wansink; Paul Rozin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance.

Authors:  T Gilovich; V H Medvec; K Savitsky
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-02

4.  A new proposed guidance system for beverage consumption in the United States.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin; Lawrence E Armstrong; George M Bray; Benjamin Caballero; Balz Frei; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  The effects of self-attention and public attention on eating in restrained and unrestrained subjects.

Authors:  J Polivy; C P Herman; R Hackett; I Kuleshnyk
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-06

6.  Public Health and Legal Arguments in Favor of a Policy to Cap the Portion Sizes of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.

Authors:  Christina A Roberto; Jennifer L Pomeranz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Erin L Morris; Liane S Roe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Counting bones: environmental cues that decrease food intake.

Authors:  Brian Wansink; Collin R Payne
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2007-02

9.  Regulating the way to obesity: unintended consequences of limiting sugary drink sizes.

Authors:  Brent M Wilson; Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14
View more
  9 in total

1.  The Effect of Graphic Warnings on Sugary-Drink Purchasing.

Authors:  Grant E Donnelly; Laura Y Zatz; Dan Svirsky; Leslie K John
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18

2.  Demographic Groups Likely Affected by Regulating Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Portion Sizes.

Authors:  Natalie R Smith; Anna H Grummon; Leah M Frerichs
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Depressive and Social Anxiety Symptoms Among Children and Adolescents Aged 7-17 Years, Stratified by Body Composition.

Authors:  Jieyu Liu; Ting Chen; Manman Chen; Ying Ma; Tao Ma; Di Gao; Yanhui Li; Qi Ma; Li Chen; Xinxin Wang; Yi Zhang; Jun Ma; Yanhui Dong
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.

Authors:  Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 5.  The Effect of Downsizing Packages of Energy-Dense, Nutrient-Poor Snacks and Drinks on Consumption, Intentions, and Perceptions-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Qingzhou Liu; Lok Yin Tam; Anna Rangan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Changes in Calorie Content of Menu Items at Large Chain Restaurants After Implementation of Calorie Labels.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Joshua Petimar; Mark J Soto; Sara N Bleich; Denise Simon; Lauren P Cleveland; Anjali Rao; Jason P Block
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Sugar-sweetened beverage purchases and intake at event arenas with and without a portion size cap.

Authors:  Sheri Volger; James Scott Parrott; Brian Elbel; Leslie John; Jason P Block; Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-12-09

8.  Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review.

Authors:  Natalie Riva Smith; Anna H Grummon; Shu Wen Ng; Sarah Towner Wright; Leah Frerichs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  The impact of the Oakland sugar-sweetened beverage tax on bottled soda and fountain drink prices in fast-food restaurants.

Authors:  Samantha Marinello; Andrea A Pipito; Julien Leider; Oksana Pugach; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-12-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.